A Super-Assembly of Whi3 Encodes Memory of Deceptive Encounters by Single Cells during Yeast Courtship  Fabrice Caudron, Yves Barral  Cell  Volume 155,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Remodeling of the Fission Yeast Cdc42 Cell-Polarity Module via the Sty1 p38 Stress- Activated Protein Kinase Pathway  Delyan R. Mutavchiev, Marcin Leda,
Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Distinct Interactions Select and Maintain a Specific Cell Fate
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase  Ketki Karanam, Ran Kafri,
Stephanie L. Gupton, Frank B. Gertler  Developmental Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Dynamic Response Diversity of NFAT Isoforms in Individual Living Cells
Nuclear Movement Regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, Myosin, and Actin Flow Establishes MTOC Polarization in Migrating Cells  Edgar R. Gomes, Shantanu Jani, Gregg.
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Benoit Sorre, Aryeh Warmflash, Ali H. Brivanlou, Eric D. Siggia 
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages (October 2008)
Hiromasa Tanaka, Tau-Mu Yi  Biophysical Journal 
Nuclear calcium signaling drives nuclear actin polymerization in T cells. Nuclear calcium signaling drives nuclear actin polymerization in T cells. (A)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Long-Range Ca2+ Signaling from Growth Cone to Soma Mediates Reversal of Neuronal Migration Induced by Slit-2  Chen-bing Guan, Hua-tai Xu, Ming Jin, Xiao-bing.
Dan Zhang, Aleksandar Vjestica, Snezhana Oliferenko  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Distinct Interactions Select and Maintain a Specific Cell Fate
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Andreas Doncic, Jan M. Skotheim  Molecular Cell 
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Li Xu, Anthony Bretscher  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Cytosolic pH Regulates Cell Growth through Distinct GTPases, Arf1 and Gtr1, to Promote Ras/PKA and TORC1 Activity  Reinhard Dechant, Shady Saad, Alfredo J.
Polarity Determinants Tea1p, Tea4p, and Pom1p Inhibit Division-Septum Assembly at Cell Ends in Fission Yeast  Yinyi Huang, Ting Gang Chew, Wanzhong Ge,
Live Imaging Reveals that the First Division of Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells Often Yields Asymmetric Fates  Katharine Brown, Kyle M. Loh,
A Role for the FEAR Pathway in Nuclear Positioning during Anaphase
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Teemu P. Miettinen, Mikael Björklund  Cell Reports 
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2019)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Role of Polarized G Protein Signaling in Tracking Pheromone Gradients
Presentation transcript:

A Super-Assembly of Whi3 Encodes Memory of Deceptive Encounters by Single Cells during Yeast Courtship  Fabrice Caudron, Yves Barral  Cell  Volume 155, Issue 6, Pages 1244-1257 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Yeast Cells Become Refractory to Pheromone after an Unsuccessful Mating Attempt (A) Escape of a wild-type cell exposed to 7 nM pheromone. See also Movie S1. (B–D) Percentage of initial cells still shmooing after the indicated time in the indicated microfluidic setups. (E) Refractory state of a cell allowed to escape from pheromone arrest (5 nM pheromone) and released in pheromone-free medium for 4.75 hr. (F) A wild-type cell exposed to 9 nM pheromone for 3 hr, switched to a pheromone-free medium for 2.5 hr, and re-exposed to a medium containing 9 nM pheromone for the remaining 10.5 hr. See also Movie S2. (G) Percent of initial cells shmooing upon second exposure to 9 nM pheromone (mean ± SD). The scale bars represent 5 μm. Time axis (bottom) indicates the timing of the budding events and the cell-cycle state (d, daughter cell). The blue bar under each image indicates the presence and concentration of pheromone. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 After Escape, the Cells Still Respond but Only to Higher Pheromone Concentration (A) A wild-type cell exposed to 5 nM pheromone escaped and resumed shmooing upon switching to 50 nM pheromone. See also Movie S3. (B) Percent of cells resuming shmooing after escape at indicated pheromone concentrations (n = 82, 34, and 67 cells, respectively). (C) Single focal plane images of cells expressing Ste2-GFP and exposed to 5 nM pheromone during the indicated time. Arrowheads point to Ste2-GFP at the plasma membrane. The scale bars represent 5 μm. DIC, differential interference contrast. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Pheromone Response Pathway Remains Functional during Escape (A) Localization of Ste2-GFP in cells (sum projection) exposed to pheromone for the indicated time and released in pheromone-free medium for 2 hr (right). Note that the plasma membrane localization is blurred due to the sum projection. (B) Quantification of Ste2-GFP fluorescence intensity (arbitrary units) in cells (n > 50) as in (A). Mean ± SD. (C) Schematic of the Fus3-GFP nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio measurement assay and localization of Fus3-GFP in wild-type cells upon exposure and removal after 1.75 hr of pheromone (bottom left), no exposure to pheromone (top right), or constant exposure to pheromone (bottom right). (D–F) Fus3-GFP nuclear/cytoplasmic average intensity ratio (mean ± SEM) in cells exposed to pheromone for 1.75 hr (before the dashed line) and then to a pheromone-free medium (after the dashed line; D), in cells dividing in pheromone-free medium (E) or in cells in constant pheromone (F; arrows indicate escape events). (G) Same data as in (F), but single traces were synchronized by the time of escape (dashed line) before averaging. n = 40 cells for each condition. (H) Statistical analysis of the values of (D), (E), and (G) at indicated times. (I–K) PFUS1-UBI-YΔkGFP∗ average intensity (mean ± SEM) for cells exposed to pheromone for 1.75 hr (before the dashed line) and then to a pheromone-free medium (after the dashed line; I), cells in pheromone-free medium (J), or cells in constant pheromone (K; arrows indicate escape events). (L) Same data as in (K), but single traces were reaveraged as in (G). n = 50 cells for each condition. (M) Statistical analysis of the values of (I), (J), and (L) at indicated times. Three asterisks indicate p < 0.001 using one-way ANOVA. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PrD-Dependent Repression of Whi3 and Release of Cln3 from Inhibition Drives Escape (A) Percentage of cells of indicated genotypes shmooing in 7 nM pheromone over time, as in Figure 1B. (B) Schematic representation of WHI3 alleles. (C) Size distribution for cells of indicated genotypes. (D) Escape of a whi3-ΔpQ mutant cell exposed to 7 nM pheromone, as in Figure 1A. The scale bar represents 5 μm. See also Movie S4. (E–G) Plots as in (B) for cells of indicated genotypes in the presence of 7 nM (E and G) or 5 nM (F) pheromone. (H) Western blot analysis of in vivo levels of Cln3-3HA in wild-type and whi3-ΔpQpN mutant cells exposed to pheromone for the indicated times. (I) Quantification of Cln3-3HA from (H). See also Data S1. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Refractory State and Its Maintenance Depend on the PrDs of Whi3 (A) A whi3-ΔpQ mutant cell exposed to 9 nM pheromone for 3 hr, switched to a pheromone-free medium for 2.5 hr, and re-exposed to 9 nM pheromone for the remaining 10.5 hr. See also Movie S5. (B) Percent of cells of indicated genotypes shmooing upon re-exposure to 9 nM pheromone. (C) A whi3-ΔpN mutant cell escaped and resumed shmooing during constant exposure to 5 nM pheromone. See also Movie S6. (D) Quantification of cells shmooing at least once in 13 hr after escape of the indicated genotypes. (E) Quantification of cells of indicated genotypes that reshmooed at least once in 8 hr after escape. For (A) and (C), scale bars = 5 μm. For (B), (D), and (E) (mean ± SD), stars indicate p values obtained from one-way ANOVA comparing to wild-type. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Whi3 Forms Asymmetrically Inherited Super-Assemblies in Response to Pheromone (A) Behavior of Whi3-TAP from cells ± pheromone treatment on SDD-AGE. (B and C) Proteinase K sensitivity of Whi3-TAP (B) and Whi3-ΔpQpN-TAP (C) extracted from cells treated or not with pheromone. Arrowheads indicate resistant species. (D) Localization of Whi3-3GFP ± pheromone treatment (7 nM). Arrowheads, granules; arrows, super-assembly. (E) Quantification of Whi3-3GFP super-assemblies (mean ± SD). Blue indicates cells with no super-assembly and many granules, green cells with a super-assembly and many granules, and red cells with a super-assembly and very few or no granules. Transparent lines correspond to the wild-type values. (F) Asymmetric segregation of Whi3-3GFP super-assemblies in cells exposed to pheromone for 3 hr and released in a pheromone-free medium for 1.5 hr. See also Figures S1, S2, and S3. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Hsp70 Chaperone Ssa1 Inhibits Whi3 Assembly and the Escape (A) Lack of colocalization of Hsp104-mCherry with Whi3-3GFP super-assemblies in a wild-type cell treated with pheromone (7 nM) for 3 hr. (B) Whi3-3GFP and Hsp104-mCherry fluorescence intensities profiles of the line indicated in (A). (C and D) Colocalization (C) and quantification (D) of the intensities of Whi3-3GFP and Ssa1-mCherry super-assemblies in a wild-type cell treated with pheromone. (E and F) Lack of colocalization (E) and quantification (F) of the intensities of Ssa1-mCherry with Whi3-3GFP granules in a wild-type cell treated with pheromone. (G) Localization of Whi3-3GFP ± pheromone treatment (7 nM) in ssa1Δ mutant cells. Arrowheads, granules; arrows, super-assemblies; scale bars for (A), (C), (E), and (G) = 5 μm. (H) Quantification of Whi3-3GFP assembly (mean ± SD), as for Figure 6E. (I–K) Percentage of cells with indicated genotypes shmooing in the presence of 7 nM pheromone. See also Figures S4 and S5. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Whi3-TAP Super-Assemblies in Sucrose Gradients, Related to Figure 6 Fractionation of Whi3-TAP, Whi3ΔpQpN-TAP and Pgk1 as a control from cells ± pheromone treatment over 0%–40% sucrose gradients. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Whi3-3GFP Super-Assemblies in Live Cells, Related to Figure 6 Localization of Whi3-3GFP ± pheromone treatment (7 nM). Arrowheads = granules; arrows = super-assembly. (A) and (B) are raw images of Figure 6D and 6F. (C) shows several focal planes of the wild-type images from Figure 6D. Note that super-assemblies span several focal planes whereas granules do not. Scale bar = 5 μm. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Whi3-3GFP Super-Assemblies in Fixed Cells, Related to Figure 6 Localization of Whi3-3GFP, Whi3-ΔpQ-3GFP, Whi3-ΔpQpN-3GFP or Whi3-3GFP in ssa1Δ mutant cells ± pheromone treatment (7 nM) after fixation and quantification of the fraction of cells having a super-assembly (mean ± SD). Arrows point to super-assemblies. Scale bar = 5 μm. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Whi3-3GFP Super-Assemblies Do Not Partition to the IPOD or JUNQ, Related to Figure 7 Whi3-3GFP super-assemblies do not localize close to the nucleus. A wild-type cell treated with pheromone (7 nM) for 3 hr and stained with DAPI. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Role of Chaperones in Whi3 Super-Assembly and Escape, Related to Figure 6A (A) Quantification of Whi3-3GFP assembly (mean ± SD). Blue indicates cells with no super-assembly and many granules, green cells with a super-assembly and many granules and red cells with a super-assembly and very few or no granules. Transparent lines correspond to the wild-type values. (B) Percent of cells of indicated genotypes shmooing upon second exposure to 9 nM pheromone (mean ± SD). (C) Percentage of cells with indicated genotypes shmooing in the presence of 7 nM pheromone. Cell 2013 155, 1244-1257DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.046) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions