VELA BPMs Alex Brynes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ian Kirkman and Graham Cox July 29 th EMMA commissioning shifts so far June 21 st, 22 nd, 23 rd and July 12 th, 13 th, 14 th, 15 th “Analogue” BPM.
Advertisements

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
The EMMA Turn-by-Turn BPM System A. Kalinin ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory STFC EMMA Commissioning Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, 21 May 2009.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Analogue BPM data analysis Calibration & resolution results.
Beam phase and intensity measurement Grzegorz Kasprowicz Richard Jacobsson.
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.
Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
BEPC II TIMING SYSTEM EPICS Seminar Presented by Ma zhenhan IHEP 20.August 2002.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
BPM Developments at Daresbury Laboratory A. Kalinin Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury,
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
FBCT experience at Desy Presenter: Matthias Werner, DESY At CERN Workshop: „Improving the accuracy of the BCT measurements in the LHC“ January 2011.
Jitter Monitor – Overview and Status Report Glenn Christian, Alexander Kalinin 30 May 2005.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory October 12, Beam Position Monitors Facility Advisory Committee October 12, 2006.
Fundamentals of Communications. Communication System Transmitter: originates the signal Receiver: receives transmitted signal after it travels over the.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
MADEIRA Valencia report V. Stankova, C. Lacasta, V. Linhart Ljubljana meeting February 2009.
9530 T IMING C ONTROL U NIT Features TCU-1 Key Features 250ps timing resolution with < 50ps jitter 8 independent outputs with full individual programming.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
Emotional Intelligence Vivian Tseng, Matt Palmer, Jonathan Fouk Group #41.
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Charge Measurements on VELA
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: Front-End RF Design
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Hofmann TU Darmstadt
Resolution Study T. Bromwich FONT 8 September 2017.
Alternative BPM Processing Scheme – May08 Demo
IPBPM test results at the LINAC end
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
ALPS SPS BPM Read-out Electronics RF Front-end – revised
RF Synchronisation Issues
Controls CBETA controls will extend existing EPICS control system
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
> 50 dB ≤ 500 MHz Non-intercepting beam position measurement
Phase Monitor Electronics: Output vs
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
TLK10xxx High Speed SerDes Overview
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
N. Terunuma (KEK) ILC2010, Beijing, March 29th, /2/28.
A Virtual Implementation of VELA (CLARA)
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
High Level applications development status
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
VELA Charge Measurements – Update
SuperB Linac VME Beam Position Monitor
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

VELA BPMs Alex Brynes

Position Measurement EM field of bunch induces travelling wave at four strips. Combination of signal from two H / V pickups yields bunch position. Signal is amplified, digitised and then passed into EPICS. Beam Trigger pickup Front-End Transmission cable T/4=13.83ns spacing Analog Processors ADCs & FIFOs

BPM Timing 2 stages: Pre-trigger (“AWAK”) - <1us before WCM signal Delays – ns level control Pre-trigger not fully understood – see wiki and shift #323 log. Timing of BA1 BPMs was an issue.

Attenuations + Delays Raw voltage at each pickup (inc. pedestal) should be ~0V. So attenuation needs to be set correctly for accurate measurement. Range of 20dB for 20 < q < 250 pC. Beam trigger pulses, synchronous with front-end BPM signals, trigger ADC clock pulses. Maximum BPM resolution and sensitivity is achieved when the timing of output pulses is maximised. Range of 512ns.

Hardware Controllers In order to make the interface to hardware more user-friendly, controllers for various VELA components were written. Currently have: scope, BPM, magnets, RF, screens, shutters, vac valves, cameras. See guide for more info: \\fed.cclrc.ac.uk\Org\NLab\ASTeC\Projects\\VELA\documentation\notes\VELA_Hardware_Controllers_Guide_v1.docx Type Function void monitorDataForNShots std::vector< double > getXVec / getYVec / getQVec std::vector<std::vector<double>> getBPMRawData getTimeStamps reCalAtt setSA1/2 / setSD1/2 long getRA1/2 / getRD1/2 double getXFromPV / getYFromPV getX / getY / getQ std::vector< std::string > getBPMNames

Calibration - Attenuation Set charge (at WCM) to 50 < q < 80 pC. Measure U1,2,3,4. Change ATT1,2 so that U1+U2 / U3+U4 ~2V These are ATTcal values for each BPM. Value for each BPM is incorporated into Hardware Controller. Now we can measure q at WCM and adjust attenuation accordingly using: And calculate q at each BPM using:

Calibration - Delay Prototype program implemented last year – results not very well understood. Lots of improvements could be made. Should only need calculating once to ensure optimal signal at each BPM.

Planned Improvements Improve DLY calibration program. Incorporate offset, jitter + resolution calculations into controller. Cross-calibration between BPMs and screens. Auto-centre program. Orbit monitoring / correction. Histogrammer – could be made generic to monitor any EPICS PV. Suggestions?