Richard J. Sessler, Noa Noy  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABSTRACT: We are interested in determining the conformational changes induced by ligand binding in the intracellular lipid binding protein (iLBP) karitinocyte.
Advertisements

Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
The C2 Domain of PKCδ Is a Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Structural Basis of Rho GTPase-Mediated Activation of the Formin mDia1
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
p53 Stabilization and Transactivation by a von Hippel-Lindau Protein
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Dana Chuderland, Alexander Konson, Rony Seger  Molecular Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
MADR1, a MAD-Related Protein That Functions in BMP2 Signaling Pathways
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
A Small Domain of CBP/p300 Binds Diverse Proteins
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by the Bro1 Domain
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
SOCS1 Links Cytokine Signaling to p53 and Senescence
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

A Ligand-Activated Nuclear Localization Signal in Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein- II  Richard J. Sessler, Noa Noy  Molecular Cell  Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 343-353 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 CRABP-II Localizes to the Nucleus in Response to RA MCF-7 cells were treated with ethanol (A–C) or 100 nM RA (D–F) for 30 min. (A and D) Immunostaining with CRABP-II antibodies; (B and E) Imaging of nuclei using the nucleic acid stain ToPro3; (C and F) Overlay of images of CRABP-II and nuclei. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RA Induces Nuclear Import of GFP-CRABP-II COS-7 cells were transfected with expression vectors harboring the denoted CRABP-II constructs. Images of GFP-tagged proteins were acquired from live cells before (A, C, E, G, and I) or after (B, D, F, H, and J) a 30 min treatment with RA (1 μM). Treatment with leptomycin B (LMB, 5 ng/ml) was carried out for 5 hr prior to and throughout imaging. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Features of CRABP-II and Alignment of Holo-CRABP-II-K20/R29/K30 with the NLS of the SV40-T Antigen (A) Superposition of the of apo- (blue) (Chen et al., 1998) and holo-CRABP-II (green) (Kleywegt et al., 1994). Bound RA is shown in gray. (B) Computed electrostatic surface potentials of apo- and holo-CRABP-II (see Experimental Procedures). Basic, acidic, and neutral charges are denoted by blue, red, and white, respectively. A positively charged patch (arrow) is manifested in holo-CRABP-II. (C) Structures of helix 2 of apo- and holo-CRABP-II showing the region that tightens in response to RA binding (arrows). (D) Structures of the helix-loop-helix regions of apo- and holo-CRABP-II showing that three basic residues, K20, R29, and K30, change positions upon ligation. (E) Structures of helix 1 showing increased distance between E17 and K20 in the holoprotein. (F) Structure of the SV40 NLS peptide bound to karyopherinα (Conti et al., 1998). K128, K129, and K131 (blue) comprise the consensus NLS of SV40. (G) Superposition of residues K20, R29, and K30 of holo-CRABP-II (green) with K128, K129, and K131 of the SV40 NLS peptide (blue). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RA Induces Association of CRABP-II with Importin α and Mutations of K20, R29, and K30 Hinder the Interactions (A) SDS-PAGE of bacterially expressed wild-type (WT)-CRABP-II and its mutant (KRK/AAA). (B) Urea-induced unfolding of CRABP-II (squares) and mutant (circles). Inset: fluorescence emission spectra of WT-CRABP-II (λex = 283 nm) in the absence (solid line) or presence (dotted line) of 9 M urea. Urea-induced shift in emission spectra is presented as the ratio of fluorescence intensities at 343 nm and 357 nm. (C) Representative fluorescence titrations of WT- and mutant CRABP-II. Data were fitted to an equation derived from simple binding theory (solid line through data points). (D) GST pull-down experiments using 35S-labeled importin α/hSRP1 and GST, or GST-tagged CRABP-II, or its mutant (KRK/AAA), in the presence or absence of RA (1.5 μM). 35S- importin α and bait proteins were visualized by autoradiography and by Coomassie blue staining, respectively. The experiment was carried out three times with similar results. (E) Quantitation of bands in (D). Intensities were measured using Alpha Innotech AlphaEase version 5.5 software for image capture and densitometry and were normalized to intensity observed with unliganded WT-CRABP-II. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mutation of the Putative NLS Abolishes Ligand-Induced Nuclear Localization of CRABP-II COS-7 cells were transfected with GFP-WT-CRABP-II or its K20A/R29A/K30A mutant (KRK/AAA). Images of GFP-tagged proteins (green) and of the nuclear marker Red1-nuc (blue) were acquired from live cells before or after a 30 min treatment with RA (1 μM). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Nuclear Localization Is Required for CRABP-II-Mediated Enhancement of the Transcriptional Activity of RAR COS-7 cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter driven by an RAR response element, a pCH110 vector (internal standard) and either an empty vector (pSG5), or expression vectors for the denoted CRABP-II constructs. Cells were treated with RA (250 nM) or vehicle overnight prior to measurements of luciferase activity. Luciferase activity was normalized to β-gal activity and fold activation is presented. Data are means ± standard deviation (n = 9). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Alignment of iLBPs with the NLS-Containing Region of CRABP-II Some iLBPs contain residues that correspond in charge to the CRABP-II-NLS (underlined), while others do not (bold). Alignment was accomplished using accession numbers: NP_001869 (hCRABP-II), P15090 (hA-FABP), NP_001435 (hK-FABP), NP_004369 (hCRABP-I), NP_002890 (hCRBP-I), NP_004155 (hCRBP-II), NP_001434 (hL-FABP), P12104 (hI-FABP), and P05413 (hH-FABP). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 343-353DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions