Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 10/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Stiffening of Human Skin Fibroblasts with Age
Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
High-Density 3D Single Molecular Analysis Based on Compressed Sensing
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Evidence for a Common Mode of Transcription Factor Interaction with Chromatin as Revealed by Improved Quantitative Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching 
Volume 90, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Florian Mueller, Tatsuya Morisaki, Davide Mazza, James G. McNally 
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Nanonet Force Microscopy for Measuring Cell Forces
Anomalous Extracellular Diffusion in Rat Cerebellum
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 11, Pages (December 2009)
Alain Pluen, Paolo A. Netti, Rakesh K. Jain, David A. Berk 
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Brian Chu, Marten Postma, Roger C. Hardie  Biophysical Journal 
Testing the Fit of a Quantal Model of Neurotransmission
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Protein Diffusion in the Periplasm of E. coli under Osmotic Stress
Andrew D. Rouillard, Jeffrey W. Holmes  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Alterations in Fibroblast α1β1 Integrin Collagen Receptor Expression in Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars  Greg Szulgit  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Lipid Asymmetry in DLPC/DSPC-Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined AFM and Fluorescence Microscopy Study  Wan-Chen Lin, Craig D. Blanchette, Timothy V.
Measuring Actin Flow in 3D Cell Protrusions
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages (December 2012)
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Hydrodynamic Determinants of Cell Necrosis and Molecular Delivery Produced by Pulsed Laser Microbeam Irradiation of Adherent Cells  Jonathan L. Compton,
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Brian L. Sprague, Robert L. Pego, Diana A. Stavreva, James G. McNally 
Probing the Endocytic Pathway in Live Cells Using Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross- Correlation Analysis  Kirsten Bacia, Irina V. Majoul, Petra Schwille 
The Layered Structure of Coronary Adventitia under Mechanical Load
Gap Junction Coupling and Calcium Waves in the Pancreatic Islet
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 330-336 (July 2009) Multiscale Measurements Distinguish Cellular and Interstitial Hindrances to Diffusion In Vivo  Vikash P. Chauhan, Ryan M. Lanning, Benjamin Diop-Frimpong, Wilson Mok, Edward B. Brown, Timothy P. Padera, Yves Boucher, Rakesh K. Jain  Biophysical Journal  Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 330-336 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Characterization of MS-FRAP. (A) Experimental setup. Arrows designate directionality (colored lines) along optical paths. (B) In vivo schematic of multiscale measurement regions for each MS-FRAP component (MP-FRAP and SFA-FRAP) overlaid on an MPM image (white, interstitial matrix; black, cells). Scale bar = 30 μm. (C and D) Bleach volumes in 10% agarose containing FITC-dextran2M after a single bleach from each FRAP modality. Axial (left) and radial (right) profiles are shown with overlaid Gaussian fits. Loss of fluorescence appears where bleaching occurred. The bleach volumes at both scales are axially confocal and radially concentric. Scale bars = 1 μm in C, 10 μm in D. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 330-336DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Resolving two diffusing components with MS-FRAP. (A) For MP-FRAP in vivo, a single-component recovery model shows poor fits at early time points. (B) A two-component model is able to fit recovery curves well, with lower Gaussian-distributed residuals (not shown). Accurate fitting to early time points is critical because the greatest signal/noise ratio exists during initial recovery of fluorescence. The abscissa is plotted on a logarithmic scale to highlight the temporal dynamics of the initial recovery. (C) Multiphoton-FRAP measured the diffusion coefficients for FITC-IgG at the interface between two physical phases (agarose gel and aqueous solution). (D) Diffusion coefficients at the interface determined by a two-component fluorescence recovery model were statistically indistinguishable from diffusion measured solely within either phase (gel, p = 0.83; solution, p = 0.37). (E) For comparison, diffusion coefficients were determined by MP-FCS, known to resolve two-component diffusion. Diffusion coefficients measured by MP-FCS at the interface are not statistically different from those shown in D (gel, p = 0.28, solution, p = 0.15). For each bar, n ∼ 9. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 330-336DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Diffusion coefficients measured by MS-FRAP in gels and in vivo. (A) Increasing collagen lowers the effective diffusion rate quantified by SFA-FRAP (p < 0.01). (B) SFA-FRAP shows a difference in vivo between normal and neoplastic tissue (p < 0.01), but not between tumor types (p = 0.61). (C and E) Two-component diffusion of FITC-IgG in gels at short path lengths. Generally, decreasing collagen or increasing hyaluronan content reduced the slow phase fraction, whereas the diffusion coefficients in each phase were largely unaffected. Collagen gels lacking hyaluronan demonstrated a greater diffusion coefficient in the fast phase and larger slow phase fraction. (D and F) In vivo two-component diffusion of FITC-IgG. In D, no significant difference is observed for either phase across tissue types. In F, the slow diffusing fraction shows differences between tissue types. A similar trend of phase fractions is seen as in the gels (matched shading), possibly due to differences in estimated collagen/hyaluronan content. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 330-336DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Measured tortuosity (λ) by MS-FRAP in gels and in vivo. (A, B, D and E) Path-length dependent tortuosities in interstitial matrix-mimetic gels and in vivo tissue. MP-FRAP measures diffusion in the interstitial matrix between cells while confocally concentric SFA-FRAP probes both the interstitial spaces and cellular geometries. Tortuosity >1 indicates increased hindrance to diffusion. Higher collagen content in gels increases the interstitial tortuosity (λint), or interstitial hindrance, reflected in both λSFA (A) and λMP (D) (p < 0.01). A similar effect is observed with λMP in E between tumor types previously shown to differ in collagen content (p < 0.01). There is a pronounced difference in λSFA between the normal tissue and the tumors shown in B (p < 0.01). (G) Cellular hindrance (λcell), defined as the geometric tortuosity in the literature, across gels is nonexistent (λcell ∼ 1) due to acellularity (p = 0.85). (H) Diffusion in normal subcutaneous muscle demonstrates a cellular hindrance near 1 given the anisotropic arrangement of muscle fibers, whereas those in LS174T (p < 0.01) and HSTS26T (p < 0.05) are significantly greater suggesting increased cellularity. (C, F and I) Selective cytotoxic treatment of mice bearing LS174T tumors with diphtheria toxin showed a significant decrease in cellular hindrance (p = 0.01), which arises from a decrease in λSFA (p < 0.01) but not in λMP (p = 0.39) because the matrix is not affected. Tortuosity >1 indicates increased hindrance to diffusion. For each group, n = 3 in gels and n = 4 in vivo. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 330-336DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.064) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions