5/16/2017 Inspiring excellence! We develop passionate, innovative, adaptable learners prepared to embrace the challenges of the future and make a positive difference in their community. SIAC

Core Values Student focus – We foster a passion for learning by developing the whole child. Opportunity – Each person deserves to engage in experiences that help him or her grow and excel. Collaboration – We embrace differences to work together productively. Excellence - Higher expectations yield higher results for everyone. Community – We create a sense of belonging through demonstration of respect, acceptance and pride. Innovation – We seek new ways to make learning environments more exciting, challenging and rewarding.

Annual Student Achievement Goals DRAFT Annual Student Achievement Goals Accelerate learning for all students Reduce the gaps for IEP students Increase 4-year graduation rate

Student Achievement Goal 1: Accelerate learning for all students DRAFT Student Achievement Goal 1: Accelerate learning for all students Reading Comprehension Increase the average NSS growth in Reading Comprehension for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average Math Increase the average NSS growth in Mathematics for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average Science Increase the average NSS growth in Science for the “all students” group district-wide by 14 months growth on average

DRAFT Student Achievement 2: Reduce achievement gaps for IEP and SED students Reading Comprehension Increase the average NSS growth in Reading Comprehension for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average Math Increase the average NSS growth in Mathematics for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average Science Increase the average NSS growth in Science for the “students with IEPs” and “socio-economically disadvantaged” groups district-wide by 15 months growth on average

Two perspectives Proficiency Growth Used for state and federal reporting High Stakes Growth Used by LC to shape annual targets More than a year of growth represents improvement greater than “typical” of a student depending upon where they scored the prior year

CCR Growth example On track for CCR: 231 - 5th 248 - 6th 265 - 7th 90th NPR (83+) 75th NPR (63-82) 50th NPR (38-62) 25th NPR (18-38) 10th NPR (1-17) CCR Growth example On track for CCR: 231 - 5th 248 - 6th 265 - 7th 279 - 8th 287 - 9th 297 - 10th 306 - 11th

Assumptions To judge whether we made our growth goals, I adjusted the metric of the goals to reflect the typical growth within percentile bands for the student population tested I used a factor of 1.2 to reflect 14 months and 1.3 to reflect 15 months growth.

Three groups Divide into three groups (Reading, Math, Science) Summarize your content area results on chart paper One overall observation Three key ideas to celebrate One item to investigate further

Other Reading data 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Overall % Proficient 77.3% 76.3% 77.0% 72.1% 71.1% 69.8% 67.6% LCHS 84.5% 83.2% 85.5% 81.4% 81.5% 83.1% 82.5% LCMS 71.4% 71.2% 72.7% 65.9% 65.1% 59.2% 57.4% LCTH 73.5% 72.5% 68.8% 67.1% 67.8% 64.7% Overall % Adv Prof 20.3% 19.5% 18.5% 18.0% 16.1% 10.5% 10.8% 16.7% 17.6% 17.4% 17.5% 13.1% 12.6% 10.7% 19.9% 18.8% 17.2% 16.0% 18.6% 10.4% 9.9% 24.3% 22.2% 21.2% 20.6% 16.5% 8.6% 10.0%

Other Math data 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Overall % Proficient 78.1% 76.0% 74.2% 73.5% 70.2% 69.4% LCHS 82.6% 81.2% 81.8% 80.9% 80.3% 80.7% LCMS 75.4% 72.9% 72.3% 72.1% 65.7% 61.6% LCTH 76.3% 73.3% 74.1% 69.2% 70.4% 67.4% 67.1% Overall % Adv Prof 19.5% 18.6% 17.9% 15.8% 14.8% 13.1% 11.4% 14.3% 14.7% 16.2% 11.7% 12.4% 12.1% 13.5% 20.0% 16.8% 15.3% 13.7% 14.1% 12.8% 9.7% 24.3% 24.7% 22.8% 22.3% 14.5% 11.3%

Other Science data 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Overall % Proficient 79.6% 78.5% 76.4% 77.6% 77.0% 74.9% 73.0% LCHS 82.9% 83.1% 83.8% 81.8% 81.6% 83.7% 84.3% LCMS 77.2% 71.9% 70.4% 75.0% 72.7% 69.5% 66.4% LCTH 78.7% 80.2% 75.8% 76.9% 72.0% 69.6% Overall % Adv Prof 17.4% 16.3% 15.6% 13.6% 12.8% 12.9% 12.4% 17.0% 17.5% 17.9% 14.8% 11.3% 16.1% 15.7% 13.0% 11.6% 9.5% 7.8% 8.8% 7.2% 8.3% 22.3% 19.8% 18.5% 18.4% 15.5% 13.7%

We will take a ten minute break. Have a cookie! We will take a ten minute break.

Three Different groups Divide into three groups (LCHS, LCMS, LCTH) Summarize your school’s growth results One overall observation Three key ideas to celebrate One item to investigate further

These are current 17-18 grade levels These are current 17-18 grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

These are current 17-18 grade levels These are current 17-18 grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

These are current 17-18 grade levels These are current 17-18 grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

These are current 17-18 grade levels These are current 17-18 grade levels. State and national averages are from prior year.

Each segment represents a different cohort (not calculated using matched students). Dots indicate this year’s average NSS for geach grade. Dashed line represents the level of achievement required for proficiency.

Each segment represents a different cohort (not calculated using matched students). Dots indicate this year’s average NSS for geach grade. Dashed line represents the level of achievement required for proficiency.

Increase the 4-year cohort graduation rate to 94.0% LC Official Graduation Rates: Cohort ending 2016-2017 4-year cohort graduation rate: 93.36% (Statewide = 91.0%) Cohort ending 2015-2016 4-year cohort graduation rate: 92.8% (Statewide = 91.3%) Cohort ending 2014-2015 4-year cohort graduation rate: 92.0% (Statewide = 90.8%) Cohort ending 2013-2014 4-year cohort graduation rate: 93.27% (Statewide = 90.5%) Cohort ending 2012-2013 4-year cohort graduation rate:  92.42% (Statewide = 89.7%) Cohort ending 2011-2012 4-year cohort graduation rate:  89.89% (Statewide = 89.26%) Cohort ending 2010-2011 4-year cohort graduation rate:  83.65% (Statewide = 88.32%)

5-Year Cohort Graduation (Data Used on the Iowa Report Card) LC Official Graduation Rates: Cohort ending 2016-2017 5-year cohort graduation rate: 94.07% (Statewide = 93.4%) Cohort ending 2015-2016 5-year cohort graduation rate: 94.81% (Statewide = 93.3%) Cohort ending 2014-2015 5-year cohort graduation rate: 95.7% (Statewide = 93.1%) Cohort ending 2013-2014 5-year cohort graduation rate: 94.31% (Statewide = 92.3%) Cohort ending 2012-2013 5-year cohort graduation rate:  93.72% (Statewide = 92.1%) Cohort ending 2011-2012 5-year cohort graduation rate:  85.58% (Statewide = 91.4%) Cohort ending 2010-2011 5-year cohort graduation rate:  86.67% (Statewide = 91.80%)

Dropout Rates Dropout Year LCHS Number LCHS Rate (9-12) State (9-12) 2017 17 1.77% 2.8% 2016 22 2.26% 2015 10 1% 2.5% 2014 13 1.57% 2.7% 2013 11 1.18% 2012 23 2.53% 3.2% 2011 43 4.80% 3.4% 2010 54 5.60% 3.41% 2009 60 5.63% 3.15% Dropout Rates: *The dropout window for a school year begins on certified enrollment count day (October 1, 2013) of that school year and ends on the day before certified enrollment count day the following year (September 30, 2014).

Growth How did we do on our Annual Achievement Goals? Accelerate learning for all students (14 months) Reduce the gaps for IEP and F/R students (15 months) Increase 4-year graduation rate Any other observations?

So… Accelerate learning for all students by 14 months. Reading - We fell short of our goal of 14 months growth but exceeded one year of growth. Math - We met our goal of 14 months growth. Science - We met our goal of 14 months growth. Accelerate learning for IEP and SED subgroups by 15 months. Reading - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEP and fell short of our goal for SED students but exceeded one year of growth. Math - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEP and met our goal for SED students. Science - We met our goal of 15 months growth for students with IEPs but met our goal for SED students. We fell short of our graduation rate goal of increasing the 4-year cohort rate to 94.0% but increased our percentage and are above the state average. For the percentage of all students in the proficient categories, we increased in reading, increased in science and remained constant in math. We increased the percentage of all students in the advanced proficient categories in reading, math and science.

Thank you very much for your participation tonight! See you next month! (June 21st) SIAC agendas and resources https://goo.gl/H76BNZ