Panel Questions addressed

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
1 LIGO-G D LIGO Commissioning PAC Meeting, 18 May 2005, LIGO Livingston Joe Giaime, LSU & LLO, for the entire commissioning team. PAC Meeting,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Commissioning Report LSC Meeting, Hanover August 19, 2003 Peter Fritschel, MIT.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Status of LIGO Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala LIGO-G D Commissioning and detector improvements for S4.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO-G D LIGO Detector Performance Michael E. Zucker LIGO Livingston Observatory NSF Review of the LIGO Laboratory 17 November, 2003 at LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
LIGO- G M Paths to Improving Detector Performance Rainer Weiss, David Shoemaker NSF Review Caltech, 30 April 2001.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
G I Enhanced LIGO Update Rana Adhikari July ’07 LSC Meeting.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Aspen January, 2005 Nergis Mavalvala
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Commissioning Progress and Plans
6. Noise sources encountered
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Frequency Noise in Virgo
LIGO Detector Commissioning
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Panel Questions addressed What is the number of noise sources that were discovered between S1 and S2 and between S2 and S3? Question 3 What is the work plan for the Hanford interferometers after S3? What are the plans for pushing identified noise sources down? Question 7 How many of the noise sources that have been identified will not be helped by Advanced LIGO? Question 11 What are the roles of the 11 graduate students that are currently supported by LIGO? Question 14 What is the total number of PhDs associated with LIGO that were granted in the last five years?

6. Noise sources encountered Commissioning philosophy is to get as quickly as possible to the riskiest parts of the detector, e.g. Length and alignment control of long cavities Optical properties of the mirrors Digital control system Operate with the minimum number of subsystems necessary to get initial assessment Then bring on major subsystems, e.g. Full frequency control (common mode) servo Full angular sensing and control (wavefront sensing) system

6. Noise sources encountered Electronics noise ADC noise  analog whitening filters DAC noise  analog dewhitening filters Sensing/dark noise  detect more light Digital suspensions and new coil drivers Noisy analog electronics RFI Frequency noise Common mode servo makes mode cleaner follow common arm as a quiet frequency reference High bandwidth in three nested loops  need 1 MHz bandwidth in PSL loop, 100 kHz bandwidth in MC loop, 20 kHz in CM loop Hybrid digital-analog servo with blended actuation paths Intensity noise Sensing after mode cleaner added frequency noise Dynamic range, saturations, non-linearities

6. Noise sources encountered Acoustic noise and microphonics Beam clipping on limiting apertures Vibrational modes of periscopes Phase noise on input light and at detection ports Angular misalignments 12 degrees of freedom need to be controlled to bring ifo to same DC operating point Alignment sensitivity matrix depends on power in ifo (thermal lensing effects?) Blend wavefront sensing and optical lever damping actuation paths Auxiliary degrees of freedom Sensing noise in Michelson (MICH) and power-recycling cavity (PRC) which sensed at a pick-off port with little light (low sensitivity) Wedged optics in power-recycling cavity  large coupling of 12 Hz bounce mode to longitudinal dof High bandwidth with noisy sensor  BAD news

Progression in Strain Sensitivity L1

L1 during S1

LLO S2 Sensitivity

Scattering reduced by acoustic shielding

3. Work Plan for Hanford after S3 Optical noise (f  200 Hz) Increase laser power Thermal lensing Thermal compensation Increase RF sideband coupling into PRC Increase overlap between Carrier and RF sideband at AS port Acoustic mitigation (60  f  few 100 Hz) Complete REFL port work  frequency noise Auxilliary degrees of freedom (f  100 Hz) Reduce sensing noise by detecting more light at POB Damp vertical mode (at 12 Hz) to reduce bandwidth requirement of PRC and MICH loops Engage correction paths (depends on stability of MICH  AS coupling coefficient)

3. Work Plan for Hanford after S3 Alignment control system (f  50 Hz) Adaptive algorithms for ASC to include Sideband power and arm power scalings Radiation pressure compensation RF phase Wideband control loops to wean off optical lever Beam centering to within 1mm on optics using zoom lenses and fast image processing

3. Work Plan for Hanford after S3 Low noise DACs from FDI have 100x lower noise New AS_I servo to subtract RF signal in “other” quadrature from photocurrent Intensity stabilization External pre-isolation (PEPI) Wideband frequency servo boards Output mode cleaner

3. Summary of post-S3 work First ~6 months after S3 L1 H1 H2 ► Seismic upgrade: HEPI installation & commissioning ► Electronics rack relocation H1 ► New DACs (old DACs to HEPI) ►Thermal compensation trial ► New ASC code ► Wideband WFS control ► Laser power increase ► Output mode cleaner? ► Duty cycle H2 ► Power increase (thermal lens) testing

7. Noise sources not aided by AdLIGO AdLIGO and initial LIGO closely related! Incorporate lessons of initial LIGO into AdLIGO design, and vice versa Examples Detection ports sensitivity to acoustics and microphonics  enclose in vacuum in AdLIGO Frequency noise sensitivity  DC readout scheme Difficulty in obtaining high duty cycle, angular misalignments, auxiliary degrees of freedom  AdLIGO seismic isolation system Seismic remediation at LLO  AdLIGO hydraulic actuator Subtleties of suspension DOF  AdLIGO digital controllers Instability of recycling mirror cavity  AdLIGO thermal compensation system Correction of mirror figure at LHO  AdLIGO thermal compensation system No surprises in initial LIGO to date for which solutions have not been able to be integrated into AdLIGO New ones possible – non-linearities, scattering, charging Will continue to watch for this, and modify AdLIGO as needed

11. Graduate Students in LIGO CALTECH Dan Busby AdLIGO Thermal Noise 2005+ Lisa Goggin 40m RSE Prototype Hareem Tariq AdLIGO Seismic Isolation MIT Rana Adhikari Commissioning and Data Analysis 2004 Stefan Ballmer Joe Betzweiser Commissioning and AdLIGO e2e Lindy Blackburn Data Analysis Shourov Chatterji Thomas Corbitt AdLIGO Quantum Noise and QND Keisuke Goda Commissioning and QND Jamie Rollins Laser Intensity Stabilization (M. Sc.) Lei Zuo Control Systems (Mech. Eng.)

14. Recent Graduates in LIGO/LSC Matt Evans InLIGO Lock Acquisition CIT 2002 Jim Mason Table-top RSE 2000 Shanti Rao AdLIGO Thermal Noise 2003 Brett Bochner FFT Model MIT 1998 Ryan Lawrence AdLIGO Thermal Compensation Julien Sylvestre Data Analysis Tom Delker Table-top dual recycling UFl Dan Shaddock Table-top RSE/DR ANU Bram Slagmolen Thermal noise Andri Gretarsson SYR 2001 Peter Byersdorf Sagnac Ifos STA Osamu Miyakawa 3 m RSE prototype UTOK Kentaro Somiya RSE ifos Gerhardt Heinzel 30 m RSE prototype MPQ And dozens of others …

14. Recent Graduates in LIGO/LSC Calum Torrie Suspension systems GLA Matt Husman Peter Sneddon Thermal noise David Crooks Stefan Traeger Thermal noise and QND HAN Matt Lawrence Laser noise reduction STA Todd Rutherfiord High power lasers And dozens of others, including engineering students, masters students, undergraduates …