USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Advertisements

ICAO Safety Oversight Audit and Safety Oversight Status in Nepal
COSCAP-South Asia Review of Audit Results Briefing on the Preparation, Conduct and Reporting of an ICAO Safety Oversight Audit Module 2.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Global Aviation Safety Plan
ICAO AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAMMES
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal, 8 February 2001) Briefing to The ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme.
Electronic Filing of Differences(EFOD) System and Filing of Differences Task Force (FDTF) Air Navigation Bureau.
Enhancing safety management: A global approach
ICAO USOAP CMA Seminar Exercise 1: LEG/02 – Article 83 bis Group 5 Verónica Decarlos Carlos F. Silva Rueda Ankar Doobay Tomás Abrego Clifford Themen.
PACIFIC AVIATION DIRECTORS WORKSHOP MARCH 13-15, 2012 GUAM
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
Focus on Incident reporting
AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE Karachi, Pakistan 02 – 04 March 2010
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Presented to: Pacific Aviation Directors’ Workshop By: Jim Spillane, Sr. FAA Representative, Pacific Rim Date: 3/14/2012 Transition to the USOAP Continuous.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
香港民航處 Civil Aviation Department Hong Kong ICAO Second Cycle of USAP Audits Hong Kong China.
AFILAND AVIATION REFORM PROJECT,2009 GROUP 2 David Mzeka Gafor Deus Abe Njoki James.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Karsten Theil Regional Director European and North Atlantic Office ICAO Programme Elements on Aviation Safety ICAO Safety Management Seminar/Workshop Almaty,
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: James Ballough, FAA, and Claude Probst, EASA Date: June 4, 2008 “Global Safety Management: Revolution.
The Canadian USOAP Experience
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
USOAP Comprehensive Systems Approach
6-1. 항공안전평가프로그램 항공안전본부 항공기술과 항공사무관 이광희 6-1. 항공안전평가프로그램 항공안전본부 항공기술과 항공사무관 이광희
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
2005 Annual U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference Improving Aviation Safety: The need for a multilateral approach Paul Lamy International.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
Overview of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Overview of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme North Asia Regional Aviation.
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
ICAO SAR Regional Framework “AVIATION SAFETY FOR OFF-SHORE OPERATIONS/ SEARCH AND RESCUE” 19 May 2016ICAO EUR/NAT Office1 Mr. Celso FIGUEIREDO Regional.
An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme.
1 Performance aspects of the Global Aviation Safety Plan Paul Lamy Chief, Flight safety Section ICAO.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Electronic Filing of Differences(EFOD) System and Filing of Differences Task Force (FDTF) Air Navigation Bureau.
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
System of Systems (DRAFT) To be approved by the ICAO Council
ICAO USOAP CMA Seminar Exercise 1: LEG/02 – Article 83 bis
IMPLEMENTATION OF LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar
USOAP CMA Workshop Module 5 Updates on CMA Online Framework and
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP Presented by: ESAF Regional Office
Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives
Module 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Prosper Zo’o Minto’o
NCMC/2 – P/* Name of State/Territory Second Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Baku, Azerbaijan, 7 to 9 December 2005
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO SAFETY INITIATIVES Certification of Aerodromes
NCMC/3 – P/* Name of State/Territory Third Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
AFILAND AVIATION REFORM PROJECT,2009
ICAO Programme Elements on Aviation Safety
Status of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Briefing to ICAO TCB Seminar
SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE ICAO UNIVERSAL SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT PROGRAMME (USOAP) CONTINUOUS MONITORING APPROACH (CMA) USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE 20th December 2018

SUMMARY What is ICAO USOAP CMA? Scope and conduct of Audit Audit areas/ Critical Elements Audit preparation Conduct of audit Sharing of AAIB Malaysia Audit findings Corrective action plan State Safety Concern

USOAP CMA The approach for USOAP audits is based on: “…the implementation of a structured process and methodology for the planning, preparation, conduct, reporting, follow-up and evaluation of ICAO safety oversight audits, in order to determine State capability for safety oversight.”

Effective State Safety Oversight System AUDIT AREAS Personnel Licensing Annexes 1 & 19 Organization & Safety Oversight Functions SAAQ Airworthiness of Aircraft Annexes 6, 7, 8, 16 & 19 Air Navigation Services Annexes 2,3,4,5 10,11,12,15, 19 & PANS-ATM Accident & Incident Investigation Annexes 13 & 19 Aircraft Operations Annexes 2, 6, 18, 19 & PANS-OPS Aerodromes Annexes 14 & 19 Legislation and Regulations Chicago Convention & Annexes 2 & 19 Effective State Safety Oversight System

SCOPE/CONDUCT OF AUDIT Based on ICAO Doc 9735 and MOU signed between Malaysia and ICAO Covers 8 audit areas: LEG, ORG, PEL, OPS, AIR, AIG, ANS, AGA Protocol Questions are main tools used for conduct of audit Each PQ is linked to one of 8 critical elements (CEs) of State’s safety oversight system Effective Implementation (EI) is indication of State’s capability for safety oversight

CRITICAL ELEMENTS (CEs) Primary aviation legislation CE-2 Specific operating regulations CE-3 State civil aviation system & safety oversight functions CE-4 Technical personnel qualifications & training CE-5 guidance, tools & provision of safety-critical information CE-6 Licensing, certification, authorization and/or approval obligations CE-7 Surveillance obligations CE-8 Resolution of safety concerns ESTABLISH IMPLEMENT

AUDIT PREPARATION Completion/updates of the State Aviation Activity Questionnaire (SAAQ): Completion/updates of the Compliance Checklist (CCs) through the Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) System; Completion/updates of the USOAP CMA protocol Questionaires

CONDUCT OF AUDIT: PQs Protocol Questions (PQs) Standardize conduct of audits to ensure transparency, quality and reliability “Not satisfactory” PQ is reflected in LEI Evidence-based approach: Show me Lack of evidence = PQ finding Over 10,000 SARPs in the CC/EFOD database (in the 19 ICAO Annexes) (Annex 13 – 120 SARPs) A total of 1099 PQs (AIG 109 PQs)

Protocol Question — Example ICAO Reference

PICTURE OF AUDIT SESSION AT AAIB OFFICE 2nd to 12th May 2016

AUDIT RESULT – NON SAT CE 1 Independence of the investigation, Non-disclosure of CVR information and Non- disclosure of information other than CVR. CE 2 To replace incident to serious incident for regulation 183 of CAR 2016 and to include definition of serious incident at regulation186

AUDIT RESULT - NON SAT CE 3 Perceived and actual conflict of interest for seconded expert to AAIB CE 4 Training programme IDP/OJT

AUDIT RESULT - NON SAT CE 5 Sufficiency of equipment/ protective equipment and Fitness of investigators Systematic notification to ICAO Procedure and guidance for serious incident investigation Responsible person for unauthorized access to draft report

AUDIT RESULT – NON SAT CE 8 Establish and implement a comprehensive safety related notification on safety related incidents so that AAIB obligation to conduct serious incident investigation is full filled. Established a state level accident and incident database

Audit Results based on PQs for Effective Implementation Critical Element Total PQs Non Sat. PQs Area of concern (Non Satisfactory) Remarks CE 1 10 3 Independence of the investigation, Non-disclosure of CVR information and Non- disclosure of information other than CVR. To be incorporated into primary legislation, Malaysia is filing differences . CE 2 15 1 To replace incident to serious incident for regulation 183 of CAR 2016 and to include definition of serious incident at regulation186 Agree with audit finding CE 3 14 2 Perceived and actual conflict of interest for seconded expert to AAIB CE 4 7 Training programme IDP/OJT CE 5 49 8 Sufficient equipment/ protective equipment/Fitness of investigators Systematic notification to ICAO Procedure and guidance for serious incident investigation Responsible person for unauthorized access to draft report CE 6   CE 7 CE 8 Establish and implement a comprehensive safety related notification on safety related incidents so that AAIB obligation to conduct serious incident investigation is full filled. Established a state level accident and incident database Total CE 109 27 Note; There were no PQs on CE 6 and 7

DRAFT REPORT   The Draft Report is the first ICAO “official” report of the audit. It is submitted to the State within 90 calendar days after the audit closing meeting. The State has 45 days to comment on the draft report.

FINAL REPORT The Final Report is the official report of the audit. It supersedes the Draft Report that has been distributed earlier. It is sent to the State within 30 calendar days after the State has submitted to ICAO its comments on the draft audit report.

EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION BY AREA

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Should address ALL the findings contained in the final Audit Report. Provide specific actions and time-lines for the resolution of each of the findings. Indicate the officer responsible for each action. States are encouraged to use the State Corrective Action Plan Template developed and provided by ICAO for this purpose.

STATE SAFETY CONCERN “A significant safety concern occurs when the audited State allows the holder of an authorization or approval to exercise the privileges attached to it, although the minimum requirements established by the State and by the Standards set forth in the Annexes to the Chicago Convention are not met, resulting in an immediate safety risk to international civil aviation.” Implications to States with SSC !

Legislations/Regulations Budget for training and equipment AAIB CHALLENGES Qualified Technical Personnels Legislations/Regulations Budget for training and equipment State level accident and incident database.

THANK YOU ANY QUESTION...