To Sync or Not to Sync in Power Saving?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Advertisements

SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
CS710 : Special issues in Computer Architecture 1/22 Power-Saving Protocols for IEEE Based Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks Yu-chee tseng et. al National.
S-MAC Sensor Medium Access Control Protocol An Energy Efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks.
Winter 2004 UCSC CMPE252B1 CMPE 257: Wireless and Mobile Networking SET 3p: Medium Access Control Protocols.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin.
Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver Nov 2011 Neng Xue Tianxu Wang.
CMPE280n An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin presented by Venkatesh Rajendran.
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
A Hybrid Power-Saving Protocol by Dual-Channel and Dual-Transmission-Range for IEEE Based MANETs Presented by Jehn-Ruey Jiang Department of Computer.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin -- Adapted the authors’ Infocom 2002 talk.
Asynchronous Power-Saving Protocols via Quorum Systems for IEEE Ad Hoc Networks Jehn-Ruey Jiang Hsuan-Chuang University.
1 Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling Wei Ye Fabio Silva John Heidemann Presented by: Ronak Bhuta Date: 4 th December 2007.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks USC/ISI Technical Report ISI-TR-580, October 2003 Wei Ye and John Heidemann.
1 Research Highlights Power-Saving Issues. 2 Outline E. S. Jung and N. Vaidya, “ An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs ”, INFOCOM E.
MAC Layer Protocols for Sensor Networks Leonardo Leiria Fernandes.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
A Distributed Localization Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks with Improved Grid-Scan and Vector- Based Refinement Jang-Ping Sheu, Pei-Chun Chen, and.
Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver Jungmin So and Nitin Vaidya University of Illinois.
ECE 256, Spring 2008 Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver Jungmin So & Nitin Vaidya.
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks “S-MAC” Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin Presentation: Deniz Çokuslu May 2008.
Power Save Mechanisms for Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Matthew J. Miller and Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BROADNETS October.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (S-MAC) Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin.
The University of Iowa. Copyright© 2005 A. Kruger 1 Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks Medium Access Control (MAC) 21 February 2005.
† Department of Computer Science – University of Rome “Sapienza” – Italy Protocolli MAC per reti di sensori Sistemi Wireless, a.a. 2009/2010 Un. of Rome.
Why Visual Sensor Network & SMAC Implementation Group Presentation Raghul Gunasekaran.
A Power Saving MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks Technical Report July 2002 Eun-Sun Jung Texas A&M University, College Station Nitin H. Vaidya University.
Fakultät Informatik – Institut für Systemarchitektur – Professur Rechnernetze Sensor Medium Access Control (S-MAC) Robin Dunn Supervisor: Dr. Waltenegus.
An Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless LANs Eun-Sun Jung Nitin H. Vaidya IEEE INFCOM 2002 Speaker :王智敏 研二.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi- Channel Hidden Terminals Using a Single Transceiver (MMAC) Paper by Jungmin So and Nitin Vaidya.
1 An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin IEEE infocom /1/2005 Hong-Shi Wang.
SNU Mobile Networks Lab. S-MAC (Sensor-MAC) T-MAC (Timeout-MAC) Kae Won, Choi Kyoung hoon, Kim.
SMAC: An Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks
KAIS T Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Network Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin 2003 IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS.
Enhancement of the S-MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Faisal Hamady Mohamad Sabra Zahra Sabra Ayman Kayssi Ali Chehab Mohammad Mansour IEEE ©
Introduction to IEEE
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
ECE 256, Spring 2009 __________ Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver __________________.
Jingbin Zhang( 張靜斌 ) †, Gang Zhou †, Chengdu Huang ‡, Sang H. Son †, John A. Stankovic † TMMAC: An Energy Efficient Multi- Channel MAC Protocol for Ad.
Zi-Tsan Chou Networks and Multimedia Institute VTC 06 Fall
1/49 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee Tseng.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Contention-based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Neil Tang 4/20/2009.
Medium Access in Sensor Networks. Presented by: Vikram Shankar.
Oregon Graduate Institute1 Sensor and energy-efficient networking CSE 525: Advanced Networking Computer Science and Engineering Department Winter 2004.
AN ADAPTIVE MAC PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Wen-Hwa Liao, Hsiao-Hsien Wang, and Wan-Chi Wu PIMRC ’ 07.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Time Synchronization in based MANETs Ten H. Lai Ohio State University.
Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver Jungmin So and Nitin Vaidya Dept. of Computer.
Tseng:1 Power Saving Issues: vs. Bluetooth Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Infor. Eng. National Chiao-Tung University ( 交通大學 資訊工程系 曾煜棋.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks 4. Medium Access
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
MOBILE AD-HOC NETWORKS
SENSYS Presented by Cheolki Lee
Outline Introduction Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Wireless Ad Hoc/Sensor Networks: From IEEE 802
Multi-Channel MAC for Ad Hoc Networks: Handling Multi-Channel Hidden Terminals Using A Single Transceiver Jungmin So and Nitin Vaidya Modified and Presented.
Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling
Is IEEE TSF Scalable? L. Huang, T.H. Lai,
Power Management in IEEE
Power Saving and Clock Sync
Constructing Connected Dominating Sets in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Overview: Chapter 3 Networking sensors
Time Synchronization in based MANETs
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
Exploring Energy-Latency Tradeoffs for Sensor Network Broadcasts
Presentation transcript:

To Sync or Not to Sync in Power Saving? Ten H. Lai

Zen (禪) Networking Essential Fundamental Simple Effective Fresh Problems Protocols

Problem, Problem, Problem! ???

Energy Efficiency Done at every level from physical to application. Energy-efficient routing. Energy-efficient MAC. Energy-efficient everything.

Power Saving at MAC Layer Beacon interval awake sleep Beacon window ATIM window

Time Sync Is Necessary/Important Really ? What if it is difficult or impossible to synchronize clocks?

To sync or not to sync? Yes global synchronization No no synchronization Partially local synchronization

No Synchronization “Power-Saving Protocols for IEEE 802.11-Based Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Networks” INFOCOM 2002 Yu-Chee Tseng, Chih-Shun Hsu, Ten-Yueng Hsieh National Chiao-Tung University

No Synchronization (0) Basic idea: nodes have to awake for long enough time. Extreme case: awake all the time.

No Synchronization (1) Dominating-Awake-Interval Awake > BI/2 + BW

No Synchronization (2) Periodical-Fully-Awake-Interval

No Synchronization (3) Quorum-based

Local Synchronization “An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks” INFOCOM 2002 Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin UCLA

Local Synchronization (0) Offset 10:10 10:04 -0:01 0:05 0:01 10:09 - 0:05

Local Synchronization (1) Awake/sleep schedules A B C 1:00 2:00 3:00

Time Synchronization in 802.11 B C 1:00 2:00 3:00

Local Synchronization (2) 0:09 0:07 B 0:04 0:05 C 1:00 2:00 3:00

Local Synchronization (3) B C

Local Synchronization (4) Nodes are free to choose their schedules Or synchronize with others Or adopt multiple schedules

Local Synchronization (3) B C D

Communications A B C

Which one? To sync or not to sync? Yes (global sync) No (no sync) Partially (local sync) Which one?

Analysis of energy saving (1) No data traffic Parameters Parameter Value Beacon Interval length 100ms Beacon window length 3ms ATIM window length 7ms PFAI T value 4 Quorum-based n value 6 Avg. num. of sch. in border nodes for Local Synch. 2.7 Total nodes in Local Synch. 100

Analysis of energy saving (2) Clock synchronization method Awake time ratio No Synchronization DAI 53% PFAI 32.5% Quorum-based 35.4% Global Synchronization 10% Local Synchronization 2 schedules 19% 3 schedules 28.4% 4 schedules 37.87%

Global Synchronization: pro and con Best performance in energy saving Have to assume: Formation: MANET initiated by a single node. Connectivity: MANET remains connected. Overhead

No Synchronization – pro and con Simple -- no need for clock sync Less efficient in power saving Any other disadvantages?

No Synchronization: Analysis B has a packet for A in interval 14. Q: When should B send it? In every blue. Or when blue meet gray. Q: When will blue meet gray  ?

金剛經的智慧 所謂 … 即非 … 是名 … The so called no synchronization is not no synchronization; it’s named no synchronization.

No Synchronization: Analysis Clock synchronization method Awake time ratio No Synchronization DAI 53% PFAI  32.5% Quorum-based  35.4% Global Synchronization 10% Local Synchronization 2 schedules 19% 3 schedules 28.4% 4 schedules 37.87%

No Synchronization – pro and con Less efficient in power saving Simple -- no need for clock sync Simpler – clock sync is simpler and more scalable, but less energy efficient ?

Time Sync in the “No Sync” Scheme Simpler, more scalable, less energy efficient Beacon window ATIM window

Local Synchronization: pro and con Infocom 2002, Ye & Heidemann & Estrin Multiple schedules Inefficient with multiple schedules Many issues unaddressed

All of them To sync or not to sync? Which one? Yes (global sync) No (no sync) Partially (local sync) Which one? Normal situation Neighbor discovery Transient situation All of them

Proposed Protocol ? Normally, use the global sync scheme. Switch to the no sync scheme when necessary (for neighbor discovery). Use the partial sync scheme while merging. ?

Happy Ending All of them To sync or not to sync? Yes (global sync) No (no sync) Partially (local sync) All of them

Problem, Problem, Problem! Power saving ??? MAC Awake-sleep global no partial sync