Prototype Correlator Tests on the Critical Path

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
14-Jun-2004EVLA Software Design Review Transition Plan Bill Sahr 1 EVLA Hybrid Array & Transition Plan.
Advertisements

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, EVLA Hardware Testing Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Software for Science Support Systems EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 David M. Harland & Bryan Butler.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Observation Preparation Tool (OPT) Loránt Sjouwerman (NRAO/Socorro)
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
P. Dewdney Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics National Research Council Canada EVLA Corr Schedule & Risk Issues.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Emmanuel Momjian (NRAO)
EVLA Early Science: Shared Risk Observing EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
Station Board EVLA F2F Meeting: December Dave FortEVLA F2F Meeting: 11/12 December Outline Station Board Review Station Board Status Delay.
Introducing the EVLA NRAO Postdoctoral Symposium, 29 April-1 May 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
Correlator Growth Path EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Transition Operations Claire Chandler.
JVLA capabilities to be offered for semester 2013A Claire Chandler.
Project Overview and Status EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager.
P.NapierEVLA Advisory Comm, 14 Dec 2004 Project Overview Peter Napier, EVLA Project Manager Status 2003 Committee Response.
Introduction to EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2006Dec05/06EVLA M&C Transition Software CDR2 EVLA Computing (Terse) History The original EVLA Phase I proposal.
1 SAGE Committee Meeting – December 19 & 20, 2008 National Radio Astronomy Observatory Correlator Status and Growth of Capabilities Michael P. Rupen Project.
Observation Preparation Review of SSS Readiness for EVLA Shared Risk Observing, June 5, 2009 David M. Harland SSS Group Lead.
M.P. RupenCorrelator Face-to-Face Meeting 31 Oct 2006 Output Formats Part II Michael P. Rupen.
RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Software Requirements Michael P. Rupen EVLA Project Scientist for Software rev. 3may06.
M.P. RupenEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Correlator Test Plan Michael P. Rupen.
M.P. RupenCorrelator Connectivity Scheme Review 31 July Correlator Specifications Michael P. Rupen.
M.P. RupenCorrelator Connectivity Scheme Review 31 July Scientific Impact Michael P. Rupen.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
Gustaaf van MoorselEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Computing End-to-end (E2e) software.
Software Requirements for the Testing of Prototype Correlator Sonja Vrcic Socorro, December 11, 2007.
Computing Introduction Gareth Hunt EVLA System PDR 2001 December 04.
Master Correlator Control Computer (MCCC) Requirements & Status Sonja Vrcic Socorro, December 12, 2007.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 WIDAR Correlator Overview Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR & Software.
WIDAR Correlator Options and Potential Craig Walker NRAO Socorro U.S. VLBI Technical Coordination Meeting May 14-15, 2007.
Imaging issues Full beam, full bandwidth, full Stokes noise limited imaging Algorithmic Requirements: –PB corrections: Rotation, Freq. & Poln. dependence,
Data Examination and Checking Programs--Requirements B. Carlson
Software Overview Sonja Vrcic
Interaction of SSS Software
Bryan Butler EVLA Computing Division Head
EVLA Spectral-Line Science Below 1200 MHz
E 96 Introduction to Engineering Design Peter Reiher UCLA
EVLA Availability - or - When Can I Use It?
Computing Architecture
Simulation Requirements
Monitor and Control Software
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting System Status
Interactions with ALMA
EVLA Computing Software Overview.
EVLA Prototype Correlator (PTC)
Software Requirements
Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Shared Risk Observing Claire Chandler EVLA SSS Review, June 5, 2009
Scientific Oversight and Testing of Software
VLA to EVLA Transition Plan
Terry Cotter LO/IF Group Leader
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Science Commissioning
Software Requirements
EVLA Monitor & Control System
Gustaaf van Moorsel September 9, 2003
Software Requirements
Prototype Correlator Testing
Shared Risk Science with the EVLA
Project management Learning Unit 5.
Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009
EVLA M&C Components Observation Executor, Interim & Final Obs2script
Speculative execution and storage
Project Governance Deck
AD642 Project Communication: Intro
Correlator Growth Path
EVLA Construction Status
Requirements Bryan Butler.
Presentation transcript:

Prototype Correlator Tests on the Critical Path Michael P. Rupen M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

The Issue: The Critical Path M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting Why OTS testing? To reveal hidden, low-probability, low-level systematic effects that could be devastating were they to find their way into the final system Critical tests are intended to reveal possible hardware problems These are in addition to basic tests done at DRAO (basic functionality checks) M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting Why OTS testing? Proposed by DRAO Affirmed by NRAO Dec06 due to "the basic necessity for checking that the most important part of the EVLA actually works, so far as we can reasonably tell, before proceeding with the final huge procurement orders." M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

The Critical On-the-Sky Tests First fringes Check of corr’n coeff. (source of known flux density) Check for glitches over several hours Check closure within each channel Check for correlator offsets and other systematics (deep integration) Check spectral bandpass stability Check spectral dynamic range (“RFI spatter”) Check sub-band stitching Pre-requisites for the above (e.g., delay tracking) M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Initial setup at the site M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Software Requirements GUIs for configuration & status Real-time delay tracking Real-time phase model generation Real-time dump control generation Real-time data display CBE basics & archive retrieval Off-line tools Check phase, amp closures Check phase, amp vs. time Spectral & continuum images M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Concerns of EVLA Advisory Committee Context: WIDAR schedule is a major risk for the project as a whole Bringing the PTC to the VLA will lead to a host of new problems, obscuring those specific to the correlator, and leading to substantial delays which can't be predicted or easily mitigated Requires a fair amount of software integration How can you put these tests on the critical path, when you don't know how long they will take? M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting Responses Remove all OTS tests from the critical path Do the most important critical tests up at DRAO Fundamental difference between OTS and DRAO tests is the ability to do long integrations, on realistic data Noise sources and tones would suffice for most of these tests (?) Avoids integration issues (???) Pick a hard deadline for the go/no-go decision What do we do if we just haven't managed to check a lot of the Critical Tests? If we go ahead anyhow, were these tests really "critical"? M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting Questions… M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Does OTS Testing at DRAO make sense? Can we really do this? Does it buy us anything? Revnell says no gain: expensive in both equipment and people lots of throwaway hardware & software basically just replicating VLA environment up north -- why not just use the already-working environment we have? not convinced critical tests are critical N.B. EVLA/eMERLIN are unique in modifying existing arrays (except maybe CARMA? ATNF?) M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Which tests are really critical for checking the hardware? First fringes Check of corr’n coeff. (source of known flux density) Check for glitches over several hours Check closure within each channel Check for corr offsets and other systematics (deep integration) Check spectral bandpass stability Check spectral dynamic range (“RFI spatter”) Check sub-band stitching Pre-requisites for the above (e.g., delay tracking) M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Which tests must be done at the VLA? First fringes Check of corr’n coeff. (source of known flux density) Check for glitches over several hours Check closure within each channel Check for corr offsets and other systematics (deep integration) Check spectral bandpass stability Check spectral dynamic range (“RFI spatter”) Check sub-band stitching Pre-requisites for the above (e.g., delay tracking) M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Implications of Critical OTS Testing Critical path item “all hands on deck” Argues for absolute priority for WIDAR testing Many items require only 1 or 2 antennas -- argues for ability to run old correlator at the same time (i.e., two subarrays, one with current correlator, one with WIDAR) Array configuration not very important Little impact on tests Can always move a few antennas M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007

Which approach do we take? No critical tests? More tests in Penticton? Pick a hard deadline? M.P. Rupen WIDAR Face-to-Face Meeting December 11-12, 2007