Central Square School District and CSTA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
Holland Central School District 2014 State Assessment Results.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
General Unit Meeting June 1 st NYSUT Local Presidents Conference 1.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Sample Science SLO’s Grades Student Growth Goal Setting Process (SLO’s) Y Central School District Science Points Grade Level/Subject.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
Ms. Omentum 95 Students 3 sections of Grade 7 Life Science with 25, 23, 25, students respectively, 1 section of Grade 8 Physical Sciences with 22 students.
CCSS/APPR/SLO/LMA A Summary. A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty. ~ Winston Churchill.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
January 2016 Slides updated Emergency Action At their December 2015 meeting, the Board of Regents [again] took emergency action Introduced APPR.
Adding Value to SLOs presented by Emma Klimek and David Klecher Long Island ASCD October 5, 2012 Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
APPR & SLO Solutions Innovation for Teaching & Learning RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
New Hope-Solebury School District Effective Educator Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
APPR Next Steps NYSUT WNYRO Winter Leadership Conference 2 March 2013 Elizabeth Vignaux SLOs 60 pts TIPs Appeals Best Practices to Survive APPR.
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
New Developments in NYS Assessments
Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
APPR Update School Year.
Evaluation Updates.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
North Country/ Mohawk Regional NTI
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
APPR Update School Year.
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Valley Central School District
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Evaluation Information
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Curriculum Selection Process
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

Central Square School District and CSTA APPR for 2016-2017 Central Square School District and CSTA

Changes to State law (3012-d) State provided growth scores for grades 3-8 will be used for advisory purposes only through June 2019 Teachers in grades 3-8 will receive both a transition rating and a composite rating The composite rating cannot be used for purposes of employment decisions Currently in the transition period Any state provided growth score will be excluded from the scores and ratings used to calculate the transition score and rating, and back-up SLO’s that use the 3-8 ELA or math scores cannot be used either. NYS Regents data and Science 8 is allowable. Teachers who no longer have a growth score will have a new transition rating out of a total of 80 points instead of 100. This is mandated by NYS.

Teacher Observations 50/50

Observation Process

STAR – Growth Score K-8 teachers will have their score derived using STAR. Why? Quick Historically proven to be favorable (14-18 points/20) The risk of using two assessments is too great When it is used as a building score it spreads out the risk from any one class having a bad testing day. It is an assessment we can use K-12 that is quick and we have data that shows it has histoically given us a decent number of points. the state now mandates that if you use a second assessment and the student scores from that assessment qualify the teacher as ineffective, that the entire transition rating would be ineffective regardless of how well the teacher rated in their observation or assessment.

Student Performance New HEDI band: Old HEDI band: no longer in use HIGHLY EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE DEVELOPING INEFFECTIVE 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 87 – 100 74-86 61 – 73 58 – 60 55 – 57 53 – 54 51 – 52 49 – 50 47 – 48 45 – 46 43 – 44 41 – 42 37 – 40 33 – 36 30 – 32 27 – 29 24 – 26 21 – 23 14 – 20 7 – 13 0 - 6 Review the graph – Point out the change in ranges for effective etc. STAR was based on these new ranges last year and our STAR ranges

Changes to note: Timeline has been altered Every attempt will be made to have your Reflection and Observation aligned at least 24 hours prior to your post-observation If a teacher isn’t in receipt of the scores ahead of time he/she may choose to reschedule the post-observation

Streamlined NYSUT rubric Observable evidence: 1.2, 1.3, 1.6 2.1, 2.2,2.4, 2.5 6.2, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 Only one indicator needs to be observed for Standards 1, 2, 6 and 7. Only one indicator needs to be observed for each element in Standards 3, 4 and 5. 5.4 and 5.5 will no longer be scored. The APPR committee worked to narrow the focus of the rubric. While still evaluating all standards, they will be focused on those elements and indicators that will be able to be observed during the lesson or can be linked to observed parts of the lesson. For the 2015-2016 school year, we have streamlined Standards 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7. Standards 3, 4 and 5 will still be measured in the observation. Targeted indicators in Standards 1, 2, 6 and 7 will be discussed in post-conference dialog

Standards Elements Indicators Only one indicator needs to be observed for Standards 1, 2, 6 and 7. Only one indicator needs to be observed for each element in Standards 3, 4 and 5. 5.4 and 5.5 will no longer be scor Indicators

Standard 3 One indicator or the other Element 3.6 For standard 3, you only need one indicator in each element to be scored.

Questions ?