Long term projections summary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Advertisements

Future Dataflow Bottlenecks Christopher O’Grady with A. Perazzo and M. Weaver Babar Dataflow Group.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 5 May 06 Slide 1 Online DCH background analysis  Compare on-line DCH background ratio to Martin's offline analysis  Can we identify.
Snowmass G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 8 Mar 07  MD goals  Experimental procedure  HER-only x & y scans + high-current extrapolation  [LER only X & y scans +
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 BELLE/BABAR present background situation zThe information from BELLE:
Initial rough Background comparisons between Run5 and Run 4 Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
W. KozaneckiMD planning meeting, 20 Jan 04 Background characterization strategy  MD goals  Background sources  Operational procedures  Open questions.
Guy Wormser, Super B-Factory Workshop, Jan 04 1 Current Background Situation in BaBar “Always a concern, often an issue but never a showstopper” zThe background.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.
MDI meeting, Nov First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
Machine Detector Interface Summary Junji Haba, KEK.
Trickle Injection Overview Background Injection is necessary to refill beam “buckets” which have lost charge. A particular bucket is targeted for each.
Radiation-protection experience at Belle / summary of beam abort system 22 September, 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
W. KozaneckiIR summary, BES-III workshop Interaction Region: a terse summary  Accelerator issues  Parameter comparison with PEP-II/KEKB  IR layout 
CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH July 6-8, 2005 Paris, France.
HERA Operation 2004 M. Bieler, -MPY- PRC, Mai Performance Improvements in Remaining Problems - Improvement Program - Schedule 2004.
1 CONSIDERATIONS ON WARM MAGNET MEASURED DOSES 2012 September 3rd Francesco Cerutti for the team key contributions by TE-MSCDavide Tommasini and Pierre.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
1 Run7 startup M. Sullivan MAC Review Nov , 2007 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team Machine Advisory Committee Review November 15-17, 2007 Run 7 Startup.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
Performance and Aging Studies of BaBar RPC’s Henry R. Band University of Wisconsin for the BaBar IFR-RPC group RPC 2005 VIII Workshop.
November 16-18, 2004 Belle High Luminosity Workshop 1 M. Sullivan High Luminosity workshop (HL6) November 16-18, 2004 IR Vacuum Summary and Issues.
Hans-Günther Moser, PXD PXD Summary 1 PXD Sessions: Highlights 1)Sensor production 2) EMCM (& bump bonding) 3)System Simulations 4)Power Supplies and Services.
BELLE-BABAR template Guy Wormser LAL Orsay. Completing the template Very good response to my extra requests: thanks to everydoby! Now we can make direct.
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
WP9-SuperB in TIARA M. Biagini, INFN-LNF.
Introduction BaBar Components The Problem IFR Upgrade: 2004 & 2005
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Fast Luminosity Monitoring JENNIFER Mid-Term Review
ETD/Online Report D. Breton, U. Marconi, S. Luitz
Meeting closeout Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Orsay February 18,2009
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
BBBTF: where do we go from here? – a personal viewpoint -
DCH Electronics Upgrade: Overview and Status
Machine Background Status & issues in BaBar/PEP-II
Calorimeter Upgrade Meeting - News
L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab
RPC and LST at High Luminosity
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Francesco Forti SuperB Workshop LNF, March, 2006
Trickle Background Investigation
Trigger Background Experience & Predictions
Radiation Abort Policy
Koji Ueno National Taiwan U.
(on behalf of the LHC team)
Calorimeter Backgrounds
J. Seeman Assistant Director for PPA/LCLS
DIRC Background Status
Background characterization: MD plan
ETD parallel session March 18th 2010
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Thu 04:00 Fill #2729 Stable Beams. Initial lumi 6.5e33 cm-2 s-1.
Thursday 22nd March 00:20 – 02:40 on longer squeeze function, orbit and chroma correction at 4 TeV 2:40 – 5:30 second cycle with long squeeze 5:46 – 7:00.
Wed 12/10 09:30 – 10:30 Ramp down of ALICE solenoid to 50% nominal field on request of ALICE. Increase of the vacuum (e-cloud in this area that has not.
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Presentation transcript:

Long term projections summary The background projections BABAR scorecard for today, 2004, 2006, 2009 Injection issues Data quality issues Conclusions Guy Wormser, LAL Orsay Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

The background projections All based on Feb 2002 dedicated data taking Proved essential for understanding and planning. Need to be redone before end of 2003. Data taking program and procedures need to be carefully planned Parametrizations not yet fully uniform across subdetectors: We will get there! « Creative » DCH parametrization leads to ~25% overestimate OK How to describe (and extrapolate) the residual term:Background-single Her-single ler-lumi? Existence of a linear cross term Beam-beam effects Very successful description of background from Feb 2002 to April 2003 New tunes led to extra luminosity (+30%) and extra backgrounds(+50-100%) Problem : The consequences of this step are just found now! We have always to consider worst case scenarios: safety factor is needed Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 BABAR scorecard today X: visible effect with non-zero impact - : visible effect with no impact ? : yet unknown fixed: det upgrade to fix a significant issue Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 MID Dose Rates until 2009 Use Seeman model for beam currents to predict dose rates: Dose rates do not looking forbiddingly high Rates peak at roughly the current soft abort limits - DQ should still be reasonable Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Non-MID Dose Rates until 2009 For TOP and BTM diodes both 2002 and 2001 models were used The 2001 models with second order terms are up to 100% Effect on integrated doses will be less than 30% Use 2002 model for prediction non-MID diode doses Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 Midplane Doses until 2009 Module exchange in 2005 looks well timed with 4 Mrad budget One rotation in 2007 should be able to keep MID modules installed in 2005 below 5 Mrad A rotation will move the high dose in FE:MID to other module Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 BABAR scorecard July 2004 Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 IFR issues Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Beam-Beam issues in IFR Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

IFR and beam loss monitor Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 DCH data rate issue Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 BABAR scorecard July 2006 Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 BABAR scorecard 2009 Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 Injection issues Doses Aborts Lost lumi extra doses! Durations Quality measurement Offile studies Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 Injection issues Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 2003 Doses in Numbers Radiation doses from January to June 2003: Numbers are in krad, (%) is of dose in stable beams Dose during stable beam is almost completely in MID plane Radiation comes from lost particles Injections tend to have more uniform radiation pattern Mainly coming from HER injection and into west diodes Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 Data quality issues Faster feedback on PHYSICS quantities « Intermediate » physics « Journal quality » results Define criteria EMC-related analysis still lacking Have long term physics goals in mind ( Trigger, EMC, etc..) Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003

Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003 Conclusions We have to look far ahead: Minimum 3 years Look for worst case scenarios! Look for end-product effects! BABAR issues Immediate concern: SVT ATOM chip Next on-line: DCH DAQ Longer term issues: SVT and EMC in 2008 Changes in background issues Beam-beam tails injections trapped events Guy Wormser, Background workshop 24 Sep 2003