FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maryland’s Participant Experience Survey Lisa Kelemen RN, MSN Administrator, Real Choice Systems Change Grant.
Advertisements

PEER SPECIALIST Consumer Workgroup Proposal. Introduction SAMHSA Grant Consumer Workgroup Agenda for today’s meeting Discuss peer specialist roles at.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2012 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services January,
E-Academic Advising Burlington County College Presented by: Jennifer Shendock, E-Academic Advising Specialist Dan Egan, Multi-Media Coordinator/Video Producer.
2011 Physician Satisfaction Survey Results September 2, 2011.
C o n f i d e n c e p e r f o r m a n c e d i s t i n c t i o n q u a l i t y Nursing Facility Family Satisfaction Survey Report Prepared for: Wiley Mission.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Department of Human Services Office of Rehabilitation Services Development of VR State Plan Update for FFY2009 June 5, :00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Warwick.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2011 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
CSC Meeting September 25, Agenda Welcome and Introductions Welcome, introductions and 2014 School Performance Framework (SPF) Presentation Feedback.
One Care Early Indicators Project Survey 2 Preliminary Data – Cohorts 1 and 2 One Care Implementation Council January 9, 2015.
/ 14An Approach for Quality Improvement: Self-Rated Problems of Residents EQuiP Meeting, Heidelberg, An Approach for Quality Improvement: Self-Rated.
Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Survey FY 2015 ROSI Survey Results Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services September,
Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Presentation of Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Cynthia K. Buettner, Ph.D. July 25, 2006.
BUS 308 Week 1 DQ 1 Data Scales Check this A+ tutorial guideline at Data Scales.
Data, Decisions, and Telling YOUR Story
WVU Faculty Work Climate Survey
Ing. Valeria Mirabella Questionnaires Ing. Valeria Mirabella
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Faculty Climate Survey Highlights
SEMC Vision & Goals VISION GOALS.
Saint Joseph’s college of maine
2017 Client Satisfaction Survey
Smartphone questionnaire
2016 School Climate Survey: Northgate Crossing Elementary School
The Hospital Elder Life Program ABC Hospital
Strategic Performance Management
Campus Climate Survey – Chisholm Ridge Elementary School
Kathryn Janousek, MS(c) Jon Thompson, PhD Cannie Campbell, MPH, CHES
Effects of Educating URI General Education Students on Physical Activity, Exercise, and Disease Prevention and Maintenance Julie Gastall, Department.
School Climate — Safety Districtwide Results
What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in relation to your organization when reporting to the Committee on the Rights of Persons.
Chapter 4 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
The Impact of Gender Difference Between Employees and their Management on Employee’s Job Satisfaction in Islamic Banking Sector in Kingdom of Bahrain Prepared.
Campus Climate Survey – Northbrook Elementary School
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
User Satisfaction Surveys in the Czech Statistical Office
Annual Student Feedback Survey 2018 response rate 33 %
Assignments: the purpose versus the perception
City of Foster City Survey Key Findings
Palatka Member Satisfaction: Any need for change?
Val Bradley and Sarah Taub Human Services Research Institute
JDVRTAC Project Objectives
School Climate Survey 2008.
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
The role and state of the sector
Customer Satisfaction Research 2018 Q3 Results October 22, 2018
Explanation of rating scales
Agreement with Statements About Health Plan: Percent Reporting That They Strongly or Somewhat Agree, by Type of Health Plan Percent of privately insured.
Measuring Library Patron Satisfaction using CMT
Get Customer Feedback Chapter 8.
J Geetha Madhuri Journal of Organizational Behavior 2017
Figure 1. Distribution of Individuals Covered by Private Health Insurance, by Type of Health Plan, 2005–2007 Comprehensive = health plan with no deductible.
National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015
Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes
Selected data collection techniques
Arvin Advantage After School Program
2008 Space Grant Regional Meetings Survey Results
2.06 Understand data-collection methods to evaluate their appropriateness for the research problem/issue.
Percent of Individuals Reporting That They Strongly or Somewhat Agree That Health Plan is Easy to Understand, by Type of Health Plan, 2005–2006 Percent.
Although U.S. adults generally believe that scientific research is beneficial, other indicators of the perceived impact of science are less conclusive.
Using Your Data to Support Decision Making
Employee Engagement Defined
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Subcommittee on Spheres of Influence Municipal Service Reviews
Designing Questionnaires
What do patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery want
Consumer Behaviour Lecture 3.
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Survey
Presentation transcript:

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results Dan Dedloff, MA, LPC Customer Service & Recipient Rights Specialist

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Purpose The survey was developed to assist MSHN and SUD Providers in developing a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in the quality of services provided to the SUD population.

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Process The distribution period was June 13th to July 13th Consumers were asked to rate each of the 15 questions using a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from 5 = “strongly agree” to 1 = “strongly disagree”

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results 63 SUD Provider locations 3048 MSHN funded adult and adolescent consumers responded (FY17 was 3045) 3545 surveys were distributed 457 surveys were refused

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results MSHN Comprehensive Score of all questions: This demonstrates a 0.02 decrease for FY18 from FY17 for overall performances.

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results FY18 had 89.09% that agreed or strongly agreed, FY17 had 90.03%. This demonstrates a decrease of 0.94% in positive responses from FY17.

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results Results were relatively stable from FY17 The per question results ranged from a 0.02 increase to a 0.06 decrease Two questions were an increase Two questions were unchanged 11 questions were a decrease

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results Greatest Increase: Question 1,“Staff was courteous and respectful.” This demonstrates a 0.02 increase from FY17

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Results Greatest Decrease: Question 9, “I was given a choice as to what provider to seek treatment from.” This demonstrates a 0.06 decrease from FY17

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Conclusion The overwhelming majority of those surveyed provided a positive response There was a minor decrease in satisfaction Most SUD consumers are satisfied with their SUD treatment provider and the treatment they receive

FY18 SUD Satisfaction Survey Next Steps Results will be presented within MSHN councils and committees to explore trends and highlight the positive results. SUD provider are encouraged to review their individual results for quality improvement opportunities.

Customer Service & Recipient Rights Specialist Questions? Dan Dedloff, MA, LPC Customer Service & Recipient Rights Specialist Dan.Dedloff@midstatehealthnetwork.org 517.657.3011