LHCb Rare Decays Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
Advertisements

August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Andrey Golutvin Moriond Prospects of search for New Physics in B decays at LHC Andrey Golutvin ITEP / Moscow - In CP - violation - In rare decays.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Winter Meeting, Santiago de Compostela Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE BECAS FPU Diego Martínez Santos Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Lake Louise Winter Institute Outlook:  Introduction  LHCb performance  Radiative decays: CP violation Bs  Φγ  Backward-forward Asymmetry B 
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
Prospects for at LHCb William Reece Imperial College London Physics at the LHC, 3 rd October 2008.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Semi-Leptonic B s Mixing at DØ Meghan Anzelc Northwestern University On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Review of b  s l+ l- and B0  l+ l- Decays
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Jeffrey Berryhill (UC Santa Barbara) for the BaBar Collaboration
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Recent B physics results from BABAR and BELLE
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb Diego Martínez Santos
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
Quarkonium production in ALICE
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Rare B decays at LHCb Michela Lenzi INFN Firenze
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Studies of EPR-type flavor entangled states in Y(4s)->B0B0
Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb Diego Martínez Santos
University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Λb and heavy states at Tevatron
Search for (3770) non-DD-bar Decays
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Greg Heath University of Bristol
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
The Q+ Pentaquark Search at HERMES Wolfgang Lorenzon Collaboration
Observation of non-BBar decays of (4S)p+p- (1S, 2S)
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Rare Decays Status WG6 – CKM 2006 Nagoya, Japan Jeremy Dickens on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

Outline LHCb detector Bs  mm Bd  K*mm Measurement of RK Signal yield and B/S Forward-backward asymmetry sensitivity Tranversity angles sensitivity Measurement of RK Radiative decays Bd  K*g Bs  fg Lb Lg 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

LHCb Detector Forward peaked, correlated bb-pair production 250 mrad 10 mrad Vertex Locator Dipole magnet Tracking system Calorimeters Muon system RICH detectors (B), rad Forward peaked, correlated bb-pair production sbb  500mb with L  2 x 1032 cm-2 s-1 For 1 nominal year (107 sec)  1012 bb-pairs LHCb is a forward spectrometer 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bs  mm Branching ratio ~ 3.5 x 10-9 in Standard Model Sensitive to New Physics and can be strongly enhanced by SUSY (by up to factor ~100) Current limit from Tevatron CDF + D0 with 1 fb-1 is ~ 7 x 10-8 at 90% CL Expected limit with 8 fb-1 is ~ 2 x 10-8 at 90% CL 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bs  mm: Mis-ID background Extremely low branching ratio  issue is background rejection Combinatorial – with muons mainly from b decays Studied with bb and b  mX, b  mX samples Mis-identified Hadrons – eg Bs  pp, Kp and KK For example Br(Bs  Kp)  5 x 10-6, so need mis-id rate O(1%) per track For a 1% mis-id rate, LHCb expects of order 1 event per fb-1 in 2s mass window 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bs  mm: N-counting experiment Perform N-counting experiment in 3 variables: Combined geometry variable (impact parameters, distance of closest approach, lifetime, vertex isolation) Particle-ID (likelihood for p or K to be mis-id as m) Invariant mass signal Arbitrary normalization bb inclusive b μX, b  μX (component) geometry variable signal Arbitrary normalization bb inclusive b μX, b  μX (component) Invariant mass (MeV) For geometry variable > 0.4 background is dominated by b  mX, b  mX 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bs  mm: N-counting experiment For example, with a cut on geometry (> 0.4) and invariant mass (± 30 MeV) expect: ~19 signal events per fb-1 (SM) [54, 295] background events per fb-1 (90% CL) Better sensitivity from N-counting method Each variable is divided into several bins b  m-X, b  m+X used to compute expected background in each 3D bin Limited MC statistics  many bins have little or zero background Background is shifted upward in each bin so that total background has 90% probability to be below this value Compute confidence levels for observation and exclusion No cut actually applied in the analysis 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bs  mm 5 3 Limit at 90% CL (only bkg is observed) Integrated Luminosity (fb-1) BR (x10-9) Expected CDF+D0 Limit Uncertainty in bkg prediction SM prediction LHCb Sensitivity (signal+bkg is observed) Integrated Luminosity (fb-1) BR (x10-9) 5 3 SM prediction Background assumed to be dominated by combinations of b  m- X and b  m+ X 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm Branching ratio and forward-backward asymmetry (FBA) sensitive to New Physics Branching ratio (Babar/Belle) = 1.22 x 10-6 FBA defined as asymmetry between m+ (m-) in forward and backward directions in m+m- pair rest frame, with respect to the B (B) direction Position of the zero crossing is sensitive to new physics + 0.38 – 0.32 m+ m- K* B0 q From hep-ph/9910221 Standard Model d Bd b s K* m g m 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Backgrounds Background dominated by b  mX, b  mX Sample LHCb Simulation BR() No. evts per 2fb-1 Bd  smm (no K*) 4 x 10-6 44 ± 10 Bu  smm 14 ± 4 b  mX, b  mX 1.2% 1770 ± 320 b  m c( m) 2.7% 1310 ± 280 TOTAL 3100 ± 430 Signal 1.22 x 10-6 7700 ± 180 ± 2200 B/S = 0.4 ± 0.1 Statistical From BR() Background dominated by b  mX, b  mX In the majority of these events, all the particles used to build the “B” came from b-decays Large fraction from b  m c ( m ) Also expect some background from non-resonant Bd  Kpmm events Rate from this source not certain (not included in table above) 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: FBA sensitivity Toy model based on LHCb simulation: Large sample of generator level events Smaller sample of fully simulated events (include detector effects) Take resolutions, acceptances and background from the fully simulated events, in bins of Mmm (03 GeV) and qFBA (0p) Mmm (qFBA) resolution ~ 10 MeV (4 mrad)  ~3% (~1%) of bin width Sample from (fluctuated) generator level distributions, applying the acceptance functions, to simulate a large number of 2 (10) fb-1 experiments. Calculate and fit FBA for each data set to find the zero-crossing point Quoted sensitivity is then the standard deviation of the fitted zero points from a large number of experiments 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: FBA sensitivity Neglected non-resonant background for now Consider two types of background Asymmetric in qFBA (expect 240 ± 75 events per 2 fb-1) Fraction of the b  m c ( m) sample For example: B+  m+ n D0 ( K+ m- n) and B-  m- n D0 ( K- m+ n) For both cases, we make the angle with the muon direct from the b, which tends to have higher momentum than the muon from the charm, so is more likely to be forward in the mm rest frame Symmetric in qFBA (expect 1700 ± 250 events per 2 fb-1) All events in the b  mX, b  mX sample (muons from different b-decays) Some events in the b  m c ( m) sample, where the K and p come from different b-decays to the two muons – the charge of the K is uncorrelated with the charge of the muon direct from the b 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: FBA sensitivity Generator zero-crossing point: s0 = 4.10 GeV2 From 1000 experiments of 2 fb-1: No background s0 = 4.17 ± 0.38 GeV2 With background s0 = 4.11 ± 0.52 GeV2 With 10 fb-1 (with background) s0 = 4.17 ± 0.28 GeV2 Fitted zero-point (GeV2) With 10 fb-1 Example 2 fb-1 experiment Mmm2 (GeV2) 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Non-resonant events Simulation of these events is currently Jetset fragmentation Spectra and rate are very uncertain! LHCb simulation uses BR(Bd  Kpmm) = 1 x 10-6 in full mass range Gives non-resonant background of 4550 ± 200 events per 2 fb-1 Probably an overestimate – will eventually measure this Identical from a selection point of view, but without the K* mass constraint For FBA, can be treated as signal, under certain conditions… (hep-ph/0505155) Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon Shifts zero of FBA and larger theory errors Region II: energetic Kp pair Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics Drawn for Mmm = 2 GeV 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Non-resonant events Simulation of these events is currently Jetset fragmentation Spectra and rate are very uncertain! LHCb simulation uses BR(Bd  Kpmm) = 1 x 10-6 in full mass range Gives non-resonant background of 4550 ± 200 events per 2 fb-1 Probably an overestimate – will eventually measure this Identical from a selection point of view, but without the K* mass constraint For FBA, can be treated as signal, under certain conditions… (hep-ph/0505155) Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon Shifts zero of FBA and larger theory errors Region II: energetic Kp pair Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics Drawn for Mmm = 2 GeV 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Non-resonant events Simulation of these events is currently Jetset fragmentation Spectra and rate are very uncertain! LHCb simulation uses BR(Bd  Kpmm) = 1 x 10-6 in full mass range Gives non-resonant background of 4550 ± 200 events per 2 fb-1 Probably an overestimate – will eventually measure this Identical from a selection point of view, but without the K* mass constraint For FBA, can be treated as signal, under certain conditions… (hep-ph/0505155) Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon Shifts zero of FBA and larger theory errors Region II: energetic Kp pair Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics Drawn for Mmm = 2 GeV 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Non-resonant events Simulation of these events is currently Jetset fragmentation Spectra and rate are very uncertain! LHCb simulation uses BR(Bd  Kpmm) = 1 x 10-6 in full mass range Gives non-resonant background of 4550 ± 200 events per 2 fb-1 Probably an overestimate – will eventually measure this Identical from a selection point of view, but without the K* mass constraint For FBA, can be treated as signal, under certain conditions… (hep-ph/0505155) Region I: soft pion, energetic kaon Shifts zero of FBA and larger theory errors Region II: energetic Kp pair Can be treated as B  Xmm and X  Kp Region III: soft kaon, energetic pion Amplitude suppressed so very few events… Defined by kinematics Drawn for Mmm = 2 GeV 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Transversity angles Recent theoretical work has highlighted other asymmetries to study (Phys Rev D71: 094009, 2500) Describe the decay in terms of 4 parameters s = mm mass squared ql = FBA angle (between m and B in mm rest-frame) qK* = equivalent K* angle (between K and B in K* rest-frame) f = angle between K* and mm decay planes FL extracted from ql, qK* and f distributions AT(2) extracted from qK* and f distributions 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Transversity angles Toy MC created to describe ql, qK* and f distributions SM predictions used as input values Inputs are averaged (weighted by cross-section in each bin) Background distributions added (without non-resonant component) Analysis performed in 4 bins of s (0 < s < 9 GeV2) Mmm2 range Resolutions AT(2) FL 0.05  0.49 0.180 0.037 0.49  1.96 0.400 0.033 1.96  6.25 0.470 0.018 6.25  9.0 0.31 0.020 FL AT(2) A possible 2fb-1 measurement 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

RK b  lls suppressed by 1/aEM with respect to b  sg Sensitive to SUSY, extra-dimensions… In SM RK = 1 ± 0.001 Neutral Higgs corrections could be O(10%) Measure RK  1  New Physics CDF 95% CL limit on Bs  mm LHCb 10 fb-1 yields Bd  eeK ~ 10k Bd  mmK ~ 19k Gives RK = 1 (fixed) ± 0.043 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Radiative Decays b  sg proceeds only via loop diagram Sensitive to New Physics, eg charged Higgs, gluino, neutralino loops Decay 2 fb-1 yield B/S Bd  K*g 35000 < 0.7 Bs  fg 9000 < 2.4 Bd  wg 40 < 3.5 g t W b s Decay 2 fb-1 yield B/S Lb  L g 750 < 42 Lb  L(1520) g 4200 < 10 Lb  L (1670) g 2500 < 18 Lb  L (1690) g 2200 Lb decays need special reconstruction since L flies  L vertex doesn’t define the Lb vertex Sensitivity under study 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Conclusions Bs  mm Bd  K*mm Potential to exclude BR between 10-8 and SM with 0.5 fb-1 Potential for 3s (6s) observation with ~ 2 fb-1 (10 fb-1) Bd  K*mm Yield per 2 fb-1 of 7700 ± 180(stat) ± 2200(branching ratio) B/S = 0.4 ± 0.1 (without non-resonant events) FBA zero-crossing point s0 = 4.2 ± 0.5 GeV2 for 2 fb-1 (± 0.3 for 10 fb-1) Potential to measure K* polarisation with higher precision than SM errors 10 fb-1 measurement RK = 1 (fixed) ± 0.043 Good potential for study of radiative B-decays LHCb has good sensitivity for new physics discovery 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

SPARE 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: FBA From hep-ph/0106067 From Phys Rev D55 4273 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm Non-resonant background (Bd  Kpmm) Current branching ratio in LHCb simulation is 1 x 10-6 Not yet observed – may be too large? (hep-ex/0604007) Recent theoretical work suggests that in some kinematic regions (requires energetic Kp pair), these events should have the same FBA as the signal (resonant) events May be able to treat the events as signal (hep-ph/0505155) 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: FBA sensitivity Toy model based on LHCb simulation: Large sample of generator level events (5.5M) Smaller sample (550k) of fully simulated events (include detector effects) Take generator level distributions, binned in Mmm (03 GeV) and qFBA (0p) Mmm (qFBA) resolution ~ 10 MeV (4 mrad)  ~3% (~1%) of bin width Apply fluctuated acceptance function in each Mmm x qFBA bin Measured using the 550k fully simulated events Now have “Expected distributions” In each bin of Mmm sample X events (Poisson fluctuated) from “Expected distributions” Add background (see later) – now have “Experimental Distributions” Remove (un-fluctuated) acceptance Assume same acceptance for signal and background Calculate and fit FBA to find the zero-crossing point Quoted sensitivity is then the standard deviation of the fitted zero points from a large number of experiments 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Transversity Angles f 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens

Bd  K*mm: Transversity Angles qK* 14/12/06 Jeremy Dickens