PICS CF items Date: 2019-04-04 Author: April 2019 May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 April 2019 PICS CF items Date: 2019-04-04 Author: Edward Au (Huawei Technologies) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)
Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (1) May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 April 2019 Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (1) Comment: The PICS abbreviations are not helpful Proposed change Come up with some more useful abbreviations for the fundamental stuff, e.g. use "CF-IBSS" instead of "CF2.2" and "CF-HT" instead of "CF16“ Resolution Change the PICs identifier abreviations identified in item (old) to Item (New) in the table under CID 6573 in doc 11-15/762r11 < https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0762-11-000m-resolutions-for-some-comments-on-11mc-d4-0-sbmc1.docx> Edward Au (Huawei Technologies) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)
Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (2) May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 April 2019 Background: CID 6573 in REVmc (2) Edward Au (Huawei Technologies) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)
From our MDR review, however … May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 April 2019 From our MDR review, however … Do we still need CF2.3, CF3, CF5, and CF24? We are no longer using number to enumerate these CF entries. For example: Edward Au (Huawei Technologies) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)
How do the TG want to proceed? May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 April 2019 How do the TG want to proceed? Option 1: Remove CF2.3, CF3, CF5, and CF24 from Draft 2.0 Option 2: Wait till the next recirculation letter ballot to submit a comment to resolve it. Any other option? Edward Au (Huawei Technologies) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)