Science Network Pilot Evaluation for …School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How valuable is Source A as evidence of How useful is Source A as evidence of Assess the value of Source A as evidence of How useful is Xs account (Source.
Advertisements

Wendy Munro – LLN Progression Co-ordinator Building bridges or jumping through hoops.
Addressing the issues you raised (1) Q12: Informed how my child is getting on Q17: High expectations for my child Q18: Ensures my child reaches full potential.
P scales Moderation 2010 Welcome!. Purpose of the Moderation To ensure consistency within partnership and across Kent. To ensure accurate assessments.
Closing the progress gap. Key issues addressed by the study This study explored: – approaches to closing the gap for disadvantaged pupils –effective leadership.
SpringwellSchool Hinkler Road, Thornhill, Southampton, SO19 6DH The effective deployment of teaching assistants INCLUSION CONFERENCE 2015.
Impact of Children Challenging Industry CIEC Promoting Science University of York Joy Parvin.
August 23, 2015 Education Bradford Curricular Targets Georgina Graham and Jonathan Nixon ISP Consultants, Education Bradford.
Introduction to Primary Science APP. What do the AFs look like? AF1 – Thinking Scientifically AF2- Understanding the applications & implications of science.
Network meeting 27th May Assessment, tracking and intervention 3. Provision for developing wider outcomes 2. Structured conversations with parents.
Inclusive Learning and Teaching for Students with Dyslexia Rita Lewin, Dawn Nicholson, and Kath Botham Manchester Metropolitan University Embedding Disability.
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
Measuring the Impact of ICT on Children’s Education 5-14 Mathematics (Information Handling) Iain Midgley ICT Curriculum Support (Primary) Falkirk Council.
Derbyshire County Council Children and Younger Adults Department ‘P’ Scales Moderation / Levelling.
Area Networks Autumn 2009 Developing Quality First Teaching Leadership and Management.
Classroom Project CAGS Workshop Alaska, Research/Education Needs to address –AIM, –CloudSat, –GLOBE –Education Standards –Your curriculum.
St Michaels East Wickham C.E. V.A Primary School Proud to be a Church school. Proud to be ‘Outstanding’. Proud to be a collaborative member of the Anglican.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
Observing Learning. Your experiences of observation Have you been observed as a teacher? Have you observed a teacher? What are the positive and not so.
The linking learning SET CPD activity Benchmark Reflecting on evidence Self Evaluation Tools (SET)
Dublin 25 th April Rationale for mobile learning Impact 2 proven link between ICT and standards Technology in place Drive for personalisation: 2020.
Welcome! Seminar – Monday 6:00 EST HS Seminar Unit 1 Prof. Jocelyn Ramos.
Slide 1 © Crown copyright 2008 Strengthening Leadership and Governance ISP hub pilot Dissemination Conference 2 July 2008.
Network meeting 11 th May Assessment, tracking and intervention 3. Provision for developing wider outcomes 2. Structured conversations with parents.
What’s happening across the country. England 23 February 2016 Becca Knowles National STEM Learning Centre and Network.
Developing creative practice through multi-media learning: Linking theory and research Dr Sandra Dunsmuir Emma Sheffield Educational Psychology Group Thursday.
1 Forest Schools Title – briefly explain project in one sentence Subtitle – briefly explain project partners involved Photo’s Other logos.
Praising Stars is a half termly report on your child’s progress at the academy. The approach is used across all academies, both primary and secondary,
Evaluation of Whatever It Takes Project Period 1: Jan – Sept/Oct 2010 We pledge to do whatever it takes to get every child in Leicester reading!
Supporting the achievement of deaf children Assess Plan Do Review.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Developing Provision Management to Improve Accountability and Outcomes Natalie Packer Summer 2014.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
Science Network Pilot Evaluation for SUMMER 2016.
Science Network 22 ND JUNE Today’s agenda 1. Welcome and introduction 2. Pupil data 3. Pilot evaluation 4. Planning for roll out Lunch 5. Science.
Ofsted update 15 November Ofsted Framework- Focus of inspections Overall effectiveness –Achievement of pupils at the school –Quality of teaching.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
Evaluating outreach initiatives
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
Collaborative Learning
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Collaborating for Learner Benefit Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult Education Service,
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
School to School Support Partnership
Welcome to our Home Learning Workshop for Y1 – Y6 parents
UCL Institute of Education
Theory of Change template
This online module introduces family capacity building to practitioners and service providers. The module walks the online learner through the steps of.
The Literacy Hub Introduction Literacy Toolkit
Science Network 23rd march 2016.
Pupil Questionnaire results:
Dyspraxia Task 1 PG Cert Education (Inclusion and SEN)
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Impact and Evaluation Reporting
EVALUATION RESEARCH These are those types of research that evaluate the impact of social interventions. Motivated by the desire of social scientist to.
Getting Practical Science transition project
Science Network 30th November 2016.
Dr Rukshana Ahmed Professor ( Anatomy)
Science Network 12th OCTOBER 2016.
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
Week 2 Evaluation Framework
Internet Research & PowerPoint Presentation
The National Retraining Scheme
East Sussex County Council (ESCC) Special Educational Needs Matrix
Theory of Change template
The Scientific Method.
Unit No.5: Working with Parents and Others in Early Years
Animals including Humans Year 5 - Melissa
Presentation transcript:

Science Network Pilot Evaluation for …School Summer 2016

Pilot Evaluation Contents Context of the pilot Pilot changes Outcome measure Results Conclusion and Implications NB: you will probably need to continue some of these over several slides

Context of the pilot Prompts: Where and when did the pilot take place? What were the characteristics of the students involved (see pupil data)? Which year group(s)? How were the students/classes selected?

Pilot changes Prompts: What were the changes piloted in your school? Why were these changes chosen? (think about the context of your own school including the results of your pupil and staff questionnaires and/or research articles that you read such as those circulated at science network meetings) Details of how the changes were delivered Were any alterations made to the changes during the course of the pilot (and why were they made)?

Outcome measures Prompts: Explanation of the measures used to assess impact (see your planning for impact sheet) How was the data collected? Is the data complete? What were the limitations of your measures? Were there any issues along the way?

Results Prompts: What was the impact on your outcome measures? How did the overall attainment for your pupil data in working scientifically change? What was the impact on learners’ attitudes? What was the impact on you? What was the impact on other staff? Were there any unintended outcomes? It would be helpful to illustrate this with some case studies of children’s work (eg for a + - and = child), photographs, examples of recording, plans, videos of recording etc.

Conclusion and implications Prompts: Overall evaluation of results: what worked well and what didn’t? Which changes are worth rolling out across your school? If so, in which year groups (if not all) and with what modifications? What are the potential barriers to success? How could these be overcome? What CPD would be required to deliver these changes? How might the Enthuse partnership funding be used to assist with this?