802.11g NAV Propagation (based on g Draft 2.1 Jan-2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /300R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 Slides to Assist with Joint Meeting of TgE and TgG Terry Cole AMD Fellow
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /301R0 Submission May 2002 Terry Cole, AMDSlide 1 A More Efficient Protection Mechanism Terry Cole AMD Fellow +1.
Doc.: IEEE /0608r2 Submission May 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Low-Power PS-Poll Date: Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /2897r3 Submission May 2008 Qi Wang, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs Date:
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
1 Chapter 8 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
1/23 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee Tseng.
Doc.: IEEE /0618r0 Submission Listen interval for sensor devices May 2012 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /034r0 Submission January 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg ChairpersonSlide 1 TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group Matthew B. Shoemake.
Supporting Low Power Operation
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Operation With Small Batteries
Calibration using NDP Vincenzo Scarpa
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
Operation With Small Batteries
802.11k Kaiser Changes to the Specification
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Pre-association Security Negotiation for 11az SFD Follow up
Pre-association Security Negotiation for 11az SFD Follow up
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Power Management in IEEE
MCCAOP Advertisements
Broadcast of Neighbor Info
Samsung MAC Proposal Presentation
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Element for Legacy Indication
Security for Measurement Requests and Information
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Remedy to the Lost Ack Problem while Power Saving
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
HCF medium access rules
Power Efficient PS Poll
May 2002 doc.: IEEE /299R0 May 2002 Slides to Assist with non-19 Comments (based on R1 Comment Resolution Excel Sheet) Terry Cole AMD.
Air Efficiency and Reliability Enhancements for Multicast
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
HT Features in Mesh Network
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
MCCAOP Advertisements
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Request Element for DFS in TGh
Air Efficiency and Reliability Enhancements for Multicast
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
NAV Clearing: Problems and Proposed Remedy
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
Initial Negotiation for WUR
Power save state transition
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
SM Power Save for 11ay Date: Authors: August 2017
Indicating NGV Capabilities in MAC Header
Patrick Worfolk (Kiwi Networks)
Presentation transcript:

802.11g NAV Propagation (based on 802.11g Draft 2.1 Jan-2002) March 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/150 March 2002 802.11g NAV Propagation (based on 802.11g Draft 2.1 Jan-2002) Terry Cole AMD Fellow terry.cole@amd.com +1 512 602 2454 Terry Cole, AMD Terry Cole, AMD

March 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/150 March 2002 Introduction We are routinely referring to RTS/CTS as a protection mechanism for OFDM in 802.11g draft. The draft standard D2.1 contains a “legacy element” in all beacons and probe responses that is used by the AP to recommend protection mechanism such as the RTS/CTS. Terry Cole, AMD Terry Cole, AMD

March 2002 Clarification To be more specific, RTS/CTS is being used to protect the OFDM traffic by propagating the network availability vector (NAV) to all the nodes, whether they be 802.11b or 802.11g. The legacy element, normative material, and any informative material is better reworded to describe “NAV propagation by legacy modulation” rather than RTS/CTS protection of OFDM. Terry Cole, AMD

March 2002 Additions There are additional frames (besides RST/CTS) that are used to propagate and uniquely update the NAV. RTS/CTS protects only the first of a fragmented data transmission. A data fragment frame and its ACK frame protect the subsequent data/ACK frames. PS-Poll has an inferred duration of one ACK time one SIFS interval. In addition, any data or fragment frame following a PS-Poll propagates an updated NAV. Beacons with non-zero CF time and CF-End (if used) propagate the NAV. Terry Cole, AMD

Directed Data Implication March 2002 Directed Data Implication To be certain that OFDM traffic is not preempted by 802.11b stations: RTS/CTS should be transmitted prior to an unfragmented sequence, not withstanding the value of RTSthreshold. Data fragment frames and corresponding ACK frames should be transmitted using CCK modulation. Implications are: RTS/CTS is used only for unfragmented sequences. Only the last data frame and ACK in a fragmented sequence and ACK is OFDM. This is currently not covered by our 802.11gD2.1 We should address it. Terry Cole, AMD

Power-Save Poll Implication March 2002 Power-Save Poll Implication To be certain that PS-Poll traffic is not preempted by 802.11b stations: All PS-Poll frames and the immediate data response should be transmitted using CCK modulation. Fragment sequences should also be protected using CCK modulation. Implications are: PS-Poll, unfragmented responses, and all but the last data and ACK frames of a fragmented response must be CCK. The standard only covers a portion of this: The frame is a control frame beacon and 9.6 requires it to be transmitted at one of the basic service set rates. Any mixed network contains only CCK rates in the basic service set, so the PS-Poll will always be sent using CCK if an 802.11b can join. The data frame responses are not covered by our standard. We should address these. Terry Cole, AMD

CF Signaling Implication March 2002 CF Signaling Implication To be certain that all attached 802.11b STAs respect the CF period: The beacon should be transmitted using CCK modulation. The CF-end frame, if used, should also be transmitted using CCK modulation. The standard already covers these cases indirectly: The beacon should have a broadcast address, and thus our 802.11gD2.1 requires it to be transmitted at one of the basic service set rates. Any mixed network contains only CCK rates in the basic service set, so the beacon will always be sent using CCK if an 802.11b can join. The CF-end, if transmitted, is required to be broadcast, so the same reasoning applies. Terry Cole, AMD

Motion Direct the editor to March 2002 Motion Direct the editor to Re-label the legacy indication element in all normative (e.g. 7.3.2.9), explanative (e.g., 19.1 & 19.2), and any informative material (e.g. any informative annexes to be adopted) as follows “Legacy indication element” changed to (->) “NAV propagation element using basic rate modulation” “Protection mechanisms for OFDM frames” -> “propagation of NAV to all attached STAs by basic rate set modulated messages” “CTS/RTS” -> “CTS/RTS frames, all data frames with the ‘more fragments’ field set to 1, all data frames sent in response to PS-Poll which are not proceeded in the frame sequence by a data frame with the ‘more fragments’ field set to 1, beacon frames with non-zero CF time, and CF-End frames” Note in 7.3.2.9 that transmission of beacon, PS-Poll, and CF-End frames shall also follow the constraints in 9.6. Terry Cole, AMD