Configuration Management Operating Experience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
Advertisements

INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Good Practice Performance Indicators Engineering Practices Working Group Performance Indicator Sub-Group Engineering Performance Metrics D. C. Lowe October.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Seattle, June 2014 Configuration Backlog Reduction – There and Back Again Susan Atkin, Wolf Creek N.O.C.
1 CMBG 2009 Copyright 2009 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Configuration Management Activities, Including Margin Management David Hembree INPO June.
Cyber Security Plan Implementation Presentation to CMBG Glen Frix, Duke Energy June 20,
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
SE 464: Industrial Information systems Most Images and inform. used in these slides are SAP © Not to be used for other than educational purposes Systems.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Breakout Group 2: Software Quality Assurance Outcome 8/18/10 1.
CS 4310: Software Engineering
ISM Workshop 1 Independent Oversight Perspectives Michael A. Kilpatrick Deputy Director Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
Food Safety Regulation and Standards
1 A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear Power Plant Issues RIC 2009 Regional Breakout Session A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
FLOOR CANDY.
ISM at the Savannah River Site Department of Energy Best Practices Workshop Facility Evaluation Board Steve Johnson, Manager Operations Evaluation Department.
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
MA. EXPORT CENTER COMPLIANCE EXPORT EXPO Presented by : Paul Divecchio –DiVecchio & Associates Phone: (617) , Fax: (508)
ISM at the Savannah River Site
Work Release Center.  Currently located in downtown Lafayette for over past 5 years.  Operated and staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week by specially.
2006 CMBG Conference Workshop 2: Facilitator: Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Security Environment Assessment. Outline  Overview  Key Sources and Participants  General Findings  Policy / Procedures  Host Systems  Network Components.
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
NOE Human Error Reduction: Schering Plough (Brinny )
WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHILE SIGNING THE DEAL WITH A FIRE SAFETY AGENCY? BY: BHAVNA SINGH.
Standard Design Process Overview
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Overview of Benchmarking Exercises 1 and 2 Zsuzsanna Gyenes, PhD European.
Planning for Succession
Accountability & Structured Privacy Management
Standard Design Process (SDP) Interfacing Procedures Ashley Taylor TVA

Current Plant Performance
Outsourcing Modifications To Contractors
Industry 4.0 Future of J ref. R. Anderl, Technische Universität Darmstadt,
DESIGN BASIS INTEGRATION
Testing Process Roman Yagodka ISS Test Leader.
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
The New Legislative Framework Miniseminar New Legal Framework Reykjavík, 10 December 2008 Doris Gradenegger Unit C1: Regulatory Approach for the Free.
NEI Configuration Control Benchmark – Palo Verde
ROADS Services Training Group
Module 8 Introduction to Validation
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
CMGT 432Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
Corporate Governance for Mutuals
Heritage Fund - Disaster Planning 101
Configuration Control and the Standard Nuclear Performance Model
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Document Update Benchmark results
Roadmap to COR.
Outcomes of the Online Consultations
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
IT & Security Training Skills.
BREAKOUT 4: Vendor Technical Information
Industrial Training Provider ,
National Workshop on Planning for the GEOHealth Hub for Interdisciplinary Research and Training The Way Forward? Jonathan M. Samet Department of Preventive.
Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports
CMBG Performance Indicator Workshop
Handout 9: Organisational policies and procedures
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
TASFAA 2018 Honoring the Past & Building the Future
Workshop 1: Processing Facility Configuration Information
Vendor Technical Information
Review process to assess whether or not a Leading Practice
BREAKOUT 3: CM Health Reporting
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Trending Requirements and Results
Break Out 1: CM of Digital Equipment
Role of State Audit Bureau of Kuwait in promoting and audit of IT Security  
Presentation transcript:

Configuration Management Operating Experience Breakout Meeting 6/26/18

Discussion Topics Temporary Modifications (WOTM/PCTM vs Temporary Design Change) Governance Roles Responsibilities Cost Codes for FCRs (Trending) Document Control and Procedure Requirements Cyber Security – Configuration Control

Temporary Modifications Several Learnings Recent findings throughout industry due to No clear ownership Lack of or inconsistent documentation Ownership of PCTM and WOTM is usually Operations with limited to no Engineering Oversight Documentation is required Engineering owns temporary modifications Wolf Creek - Documentation changes by OPS/MTN require Face-to-Face communication Recommend cross-functional training on 3-pillars of configuration management OPS, WM, MTN, etc.

FCR Cause Codes for Trending How are others documenting cause codes for PICs/FCRs Only documenting engineering consequential errors Not consistently documenting walk-down errors

Procedural Requirements for Document Control Design Changes Most have 90 days past ECP RTO for all documents to be complete and support closure Some in industry have had a significant backlog Limited attention to ECP closure activities How was it corrected One day per week in Engineering Alignment Meeting One plant has a CR generated every week for not meeting procedural requirements Some documents can have a backlog of changes posted before revision Drawings – already discussed in presentation from Southern Company Benchmarking

Cyber Security Configuration Control Discussion held, however limited knowledge in breakout. Question for all – how do others maintain configuration for “Cyber Security” Not Safeguard Not Safety Related Somewhere in between Password protected server?