Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Recent Cyanobacterial Kai Protein Structures Suggest a Rotary Clock
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
The 1.8 Å crystal structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygenase reveals a novel hydrophobic helical zipper as a subunit linker  Matthew W Vetting, Douglas H Ohlendorf 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 829-838 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Organization of Topoisomerase V Topoisomerase V is a multi-domain protein consisting of 24 HhH DNA binding motifs arranged as 12 (HhH)2 domains following the N-terminal topoisomerase domain. (A) Schematic diagram of various topoisomerase V fragments. The topoisomerase domain is shown in red and the (HhH)2 domains are shown in alternating colors of cyan and yellow. The (HhH)2 domains with repair activity are shown in green. All fragments shown have topoisomerase activity, but only the full-length protein and the Topo78 fragment have repair activity. (B) Crystal structure of Topo-61 fragment (Taneja et al., 2006). The coloring scheme is the same as in (A), except that the linker helix is shown in gray. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DNA Relaxation Activity and EMSA for Topo-31, Topo-44, and Topo-78 Fragments of Topoisomerase V (A) pH profile of the DNA relaxation activity of Topo-78 and Topo-44 fragments. 0.2 μg of pUC19 DNA were incubated with 0.1 μg of Topo-78 or 1.5 μg of Topo-44 proteins at 65°C for 15 min for the relaxation reaction. The reaction buffer contained 50 mM of the appropriate buffer, 30 mM NaCl, and 0.2 mM EDTA. Topo-78 relaxes DNA at a wider pH range (5 to 9) than Topo-44, which relaxes DNA efficiently only at pH 5. (B and C) DNA relaxation activity of Topo-31 (B) and Topo-44 (C) fragments in the absence and presence of MgCl2. 0.2 μg of pUC19 DNA were incubated with 9 μg of Topo-31 or 1.5 μg of Topo-44 proteins at 65°C for 15 min for the relaxation reaction. The reaction buffer contained 50 mM of the appropriate buffer, 30 mM NaCl, and 5 mM EDTA or 1 mM MgCl2. Both Topo-31 and Topo-44 fragments can relax DNA in the absence of MgCl2, but MgCl2 enhances the DNA relaxation activity of the topoisomerase V fragments. The black triangle in (A)–(C) represents increasing pH from 4 to 10 by one pH unit. (D) EMSA of Topo-44 and Topo-78 fragments with a 39-mer double stranded DNA. Both Topo-44 and Topo-78 form stable complexes with DNA, although Topo-78 seems to saturate DNA binding while Topo-44 does not. In addition, Topo-44 shows some cleavage of the DNA (bottom, free DNA band), while the cleavage is not apparent in Topo-78. The numbers at the bottom represent the molar ratio of protein to DNA. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of Topo-44 Fragments (A) Overlay of Form I (green), Form II (B subunit: blue), and Form III (B subunit: magenta) structures onto the Topo-61 structure (B subunit: orange). The topoisomerase domains superimpose very well for all the structures, while the linker helix and (HhH)2 domains show differences in orientation. (B) Overlay of the linker helices of Form I, II, and III structures with that of Topo-61. The color scheme is the same for all the figures unless mentioned otherwise. Note that the linker helices have the same orientation at the start and they change as they move further down the helix. (C) Superposition of Form I, II, and III Topo-44 structures with that of Topo-61. Only the (HhH)2 domains are colored while the remaining parts are shown in gray for clarity. The active site residues are shown as orange sticks. Note that the (HhH)2 domains adopt different orientations in all the structures. (D) Orientation of the (HhH)2 domains of Form I, Form II, and Topo-61 structures. In Form I and II structures, the (HhH)2 domains are moved away from the topoisomerase domain. For clarity, the (HhH)2 domains of Form III are not shown. In (C) and (D), the topoisomerase domains were superposed to emphasize the different orientation of the other domains. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Phosphate Ions Present Near the Active Site of the Topo-44 Structure (A) Stereoview of a Form III difference electron density map calculated with a model not including the phosphates. The electron density is contoured at 3.7σ and shows the tetrahedral shape of the phosphate ions. The active site residues are shown in stick. (B) Stereoview of the interaction of the phosphate ions with the putative active site residues. The B subunit of Form II structure was superimposed onto the B subunit of Form III structure and the phosphates ions from both structures are shown together with the Form II B subunit protein backbone. The interactions made by the phosphate ion with the active site residues and the corresponding distances in angstroms are represented as black dotted lines. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Representation of the Unique Phosphate Ions from Form II and Form III Topo-44 Structures (A) An overlay of the A (magenta) and B (brown) subunits of the Form III structure and B (blue) subunit of Form II Topo-44 structures. The positions of eight unique phosphate ions (orange spheres) are shown. Note that most phosphate ions are found along the DNA binding groove of the topoisomerase domain. (B) The phosphate ions in the DNA binding groove are separated by distances of around 7 Å. The protein backbone is that of the B subunit of Form III structure. The active site residues are represented as sticks and distances in angstroms between adjacent phosphate ions are shown as black dotted lines. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model Showing DNA Bound to the Topoisomerase Domain (A) Model of a 17-mer double stranded DNA bound to the Topo-31 structure (teal). The DNA is represented as green sticks, whereas phosphate ions are represented as orange sticks. DNA binds along the DNA binding groove and five of the eight phosphate ions noted in the Topo-44 structures coincide with the DNA backbone. (B) Model of Topo-44 (Form II, B subunit: blue) binding to 17-mer double stranded DNA. Note that the linker helix and the (HhH)2 domains interfere with DNA binding to the topoisomerase domain and are likely to move away to allow binding. (C) Electrostatic surface representation of the Topo-31 structure. The positively charged DNA binding groove is clearly visible and the phosphate ions are bound in this groove. The orientation corresponds to a 90° rotation of the one shown in (A) in the direction of the arrow. Note that the DNA binding groove goes from one end of the molecule to the other and it is narrower at one end (start of the linker helix) and wider at the other end. The putative active site residues (green sticks) are located at the wider end of the groove. Other residues lining the groove and interacting with the phosphate ions are shown as cyan sticks. (D) Electrostatic surface representation of Topo-31 with phosphate ions (orange) and DNA (green). Three phosphate ions (P3, P4, and P5) coincide with the phosphates of one of the DNA strands, whereas P1 coincides with a phosphate of the opposite DNA strand. The model shows that the DNA binding groove of topoisomerase V is wide enough to bind DNA and that the movement of linker helix and (HhH)2 domains are required to accommodate the DNA. The electrostatic potential was calculated with a dielectric constant of 80 for solvent and 2 for protein. The surface is colored with a blue to red gradient from +10 to –10 KbT/ec. Structure 2010 18, 829-838DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.03.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions