Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Spectroscopic Applications in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Light-Scattering Technologies for Field Carcinogenesis Detection: A Modality for Endoscopic Prescreening  Vadim Backman, Hemant K. Roy  Gastroenterology 
Recent Advances in Endoscopy
Complications of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
Volume 152, Issue 4, Pages (March 2017)
Christoph Lübbert, Babett Holler  Gastroenterology 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Nadir Arber, Bernard Levin  Gastroenterology 
Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors
Clinical Evaluation of Endoscopic Trimodal Imaging for the Detection and Differentiation of Colonic Polyps  Frank J.C. van den Broek, Paul Fockens, Susanne.
Ira J. Fox, Stephen C. Strom  Gastroenterology 
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advances in Endoscopic Imaging of Colorectal Neoplasia
Volume 152, Issue 6, Pages (May 2017)
Tissue-Engineered Cell Sheets for Stricture Prevention: A New Connection Between Endoscopy and Regenerative Medicine  Joshua D. Penfield, Emmanuel C.
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages (April 2018)
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages e16-e17 (September 2017)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Yong Sung Kim, MD, PhD, Ji Eun Ra, MD, Young Woo Sohn, MD, PhD 
A Historical Perspective on Clinical Advances in Pancreatic Diseases
Volume 150, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages (March 2018)
Light-Scattering Technologies for Field Carcinogenesis Detection: A Modality for Endoscopic Prescreening  Vadim Backman, Hemant K. Roy  Gastroenterology 
Recent Advances in Endoscopy
Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of Models to Predict Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia  Gene K. Ma, Uri Ladabaum  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Fewer Polyps Detected by Colonoscopy as the Day Progresses at a Veteran's Administration Teaching Hospital  Michael Y. Chan, Hartley Cohen, Brennan M.R.
Mucosal Impedance Discriminates GERD From Non-GERD Conditions
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages (June 2011)
Sibu Varghese, Pierre Lao–Sirieix, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald 
Brian M. Fung, Nora Ostrzega, James H. Tabibian  Gastroenterology 
Hepatitis C and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Grist for the Mill
Activity-Based Costing and Management in a Hospital-Based GI Unit
The Serrated Polyp Comes of Age
Eugene B. Chang  Gastroenterology  Volume 124, Issue 4, (April 2003)
Yellow Flank Discoloration and Abdominal Distension in an Infant
Coffee and Colorectal Cancer: Grounds for Prevention?
Reduced Mortality Rates Following Elective Percutaneous Liver Biopsies
Effect of a Time-Dependent Colonoscopic Withdrawal Protocol on Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy  Robert L. Barclay, Joseph J. Vicari, Roger.
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, David Lieberman  Gastroenterology 
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett’s Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia  Dennis Yang, Mohamed Othman, Peter.
A Young Woman With Gallstone Pancreatitis and Abnormal Liver Tests: When Is Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Needed?  Andrew D. Rhim, Michael.
Shivan J. Mehta, Kimberly A. Forde  Gastroenterology 
Jeremy P. Dwyer, Patrick Hosking, John Lubel  Gastroenterology 
Volume 150, Issue 7, Pages (June 2016)
The Rise and Fall (and Rise?) of Endoscopic Anti-Reflux Procedures
Diagnostic Colonoscopy: The End Is Coming
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Richard J. Saad, William D. Chey  Gastroenterology 
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
A “Crescent-in-doughnut” Lesion at Right Lower Quadrant Abdomen
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 155, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (May 2010)
Young Chul Kim, Yong Eun Chung, Joon Seok Lim  Gastroenterology 
Reinvesting in US Biomedical Research—The Time is Now
Novel Endoscopic Approaches in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia: Macroscopes, Microscopes, and Metal Detectors  Anna M. Buchner, Michael B. Wallace  Gastroenterology 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Mucosal Bridge
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Technical Review on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease  Alaa Rostom, Joseph A. Murray,
The Future of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Controversies in Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C
Amir Klein, Michael J. Bourke  Gastroenterology 
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Presentation transcript:

Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages 1069-1078 (October 2008) Spectroscopic Microvascular Blood Detection From the Endoscopically Normal Colonic Mucosa: Biomarker for Neoplasia Risk  Hemant K. Roy, Andrew Gomes, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Michael J. Goldberg, Jeremy Rogers, Sarah Ruderman, Kim L. Young, Alex Kromine, Randall E. Brand, Mohammed Jameel, Parmede Vakil, Nahla Hasabou, Vadim Backman  Gastroenterology  Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages 1069-1078 (October 2008) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046 Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Schematic diagram (frontal view) of the endoscopically compatible polarization-gating spectroscopy fiberoptic probe. (B and C) Photographs of probe. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Polarization-gating spectroscopy probe accurately measured Hb concentrations over a large range of physiologic values (tissue phantom study). The solid lines represent linear approximations. Measured Hb concentrations showed excellent correlations with actual Hb contents with an r2 value of 0.99 for all depths. The root mean squared errors from the probing depths of (A) approximately 100 μm, (B) approximately 130 μm, and (C) approximately 170 μm were 0.33 g/L, 0.36 g/L, and 1.20 g/L, respectively. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Probe operation characteristics have a negligible effect on the blood content measurement using the fiberoptic probe. (A) Probe pressure. (B) Probe angle. (C) Colon distension. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Determination of interrogation depth for hemoglobin in the endoscopically normal mucosa that allowed optimal discrimination of patients harboring neoplasia (∼30 cm away from adenoma) from those who were neoplasia-free. Comparison of (A) total Hb and (B) DHb contents were assessed within 3 different depths of approximately 100 μm, approximately 130 μm, and approximately 170 μm, respectively. The approximately 100-μm depth had provided the greatest distinction with progressively lower effect sizes at 130 μm, and approximately 170 μm, respectively. □, No neoplasia; , adenoma. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Microvascular blood content (depth, ∼100 μm) varies with distance from adenomas. (A) Total Hb and (B) DHb mirrored the distance from the lesion. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Polyp size and histology impact on microvascular blood content (measured at ∼100 μm depth). (A) EIBS in the uninvolved mucosa (∼10 cm away from the lesion) was greater in larger (advanced) adenomas vs nonadvanced adenomas. (B) Total Hb (i) and DHb (ii) from polyp tissue paralleled uninvolved mucosal data. (C) Hyperplastic polyps did not engender EIBS in uninvolved mucosa, but was associated with increased blood content in polyp tissue: (i) Total Hb, (ii) DHb. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1069-1078DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.046) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions