Takehiro Yasukawa, Ming-Yao Yang, Howard T. Jacobs, Ian J. Holt 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yeast as a Model for Human mtDNA Replication
Advertisements

Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)
Strand Invasion Structures in the Inverted Repeat of Candida albicans Mitochondrial DNA Reveal a Role for Homologous Recombination in Replication  Joachim.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Ian J Holt, Heather E Lorimer, Howard T Jacobs  Cell 
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
A Role for REP Sequences in Regulating Translation
CLB5-Dependent Activation of Late Replication Origins in S. cerevisiae
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
H. Randolph Byers, Mina Yaar, Mark S. Eller, Nicole L
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin  R.F Kalejta, X Li, L.D Mesner,
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Catherine Suski, Kenneth J. Marians  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Jeremy E. Wilusz, Susan M. Freier, David L. Spector  Cell 
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Expression of multiple forms of MEL1 gene products.
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

A Bidirectional Origin of Replication Maps to the Major Noncoding Region of Human Mitochondrial DNA  Takehiro Yasukawa, Ming-Yao Yang, Howard T. Jacobs, Ian J. Holt  Molecular Cell  Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 651-662 (June 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Abundant RNase H-Resistant Replication Intermediates Are Found in Human Cultured Cells Amplifying mtDNA in Contrast to Untreated Cells 2D-AGE of HincII- (A–D), DraI- (E–H), and HincII/DraI-digested (K) mtDNA from purified mitochondria of human 143B cells. (I and J) DraI-digested mtDNA from HeLa cells. (A, B, E, F, J, and K) DNA from cells amplifying mtDNA after transient drug-induced depletion (see Experimental Procedures). (C, D, G, H, and I) mtDNA from untreated cells. “+RH” indicates samples treated with RNase H. (B′, D′, F′, and H′) Illustrations of the molecular species unmodified by RNase H. Positions of relevant restriction sites are shown on a circular map of human mtDNA above the 2D gel images. The NCR and cytochrome b gene (Cyt b) are indicated by broad gray lines superimposed on the mtDNA circle, OH is the previously proposed origin of strand-asynchronous heavy-strand replication, and map positions of radiolabeled probes are indicated by broad lines inside the circle (see Experimental Procedures). Probe a (nt 16,341–151) detected the 3,939 bp HincII fragment (nt 13,636–1,006), which includes the NCR (A–D); probe b (nt 14,976–15,904) detected the 3,739 bp DraI fragment (nt 12,271–16,010) lacking the NCR (E–J) and the HincII/DraI fragment, nt 13,636–16,010 (K). The meaning of the terms upstream and downstream, used throughout the manuscript, is indicated above the map. A prominent region of the bubble arc (“i” in B′) was specifically associated with fragments containing OH (see text and Figure S6 for details). Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of Bubble Arc Intensity in Different mtDNA Fragments from Placenta and Cells Amplifying mtDNA 2D-AGE of purified mtDNA from cells amplifying mtDNA: 143B (A, D, G, I, J, and L), HeLa (C and F), or from placenta (B, E, H, and K). (A) is a reproduction of Figure 1B. (D) is a longer exposure of Figure 1E. (I and L) Longer exposures of (G) and (J), respectively. Radiolabeled probe a was applied in (A)–(C), all others used probe b. Restriction fragments detected were: HincII, nt 13,636–1,006 (A)–(C); DraI, nt 12,271–16,010 (D)–(F); NciI, nt 13,365–16,454 (G)–(I); and HincII/NsiI, nt 13,636–49 (J)–(L). The very faint bubble arc detected after prolonged exposure in (I) is marked by an arrow. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Bubble Arcs Are Associated with Small NCR-Containing Fragments of Human mtDNA 2D-AGE blots of purified 143B cell mtDNA were hybridized to probe a. (A–F) DNA from cells amplifying mtDNA. (G and H) DNA from untreated cells. Restriction digests as indicated. Fragments detected were AccI, nt 15,255–1,504 (A–C, G, and H); BsaHI/HincII, nt 15,615–1,006 (D); AccI/MspA1I, nt 15,255–526 (E); and AccI/MfeI, nt 15,255–242 (F). Abbreviations: RH, treated with RNase H; SSB, incubated with single-stranded binding protein; 1n, unit length fragment; i, the region of the bubble arc close to 1n; ii, the remainder of the bubble arc; iii, paused RI on the fork arc; iv, partially single-stranded molecules. A schematic linear map shows the relevant region of human mtDNA. The broad gray line indicates the 1122 bp of the NCR (nt 16,024–576), and the black bar shows the position of the probe. The size of each fragment in bp is shown in parentheses. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Bubble Arcs in Small mtDNA Fragments Are Consistent with Bidirectional Replication Initiating at Sites Near One End of the NCR, Whereas OH Is the Terminus 2D-AGE blots of purified mtDNA from 143B cells amplifying mtDNA hybridized with probes c (A and B), a (C and E), or a′ (F). Fragments detected were: AccI/NsiI, nt 15,255–49 ([A], an arrow indicating the bubble arc); AccI/MfeI, nt 15,255–242, including OH (B); AccI, nt 15,255–1,504 ([C], equivalent to Figure 3A but with 40 hr recovery after drug treatment instead of the usual 24 hr, revealing a clearer double fork arc that is arrowed and schematized in [D]); AccI/DraI, nt 16,010–1,504 (E); and NciI/AccI, nt 16,454–1,504 (F). The estimated nucleotide position of the termination spots is marked on the fork arc. The map shows the relevant region of human mtDNA. Black bars indicate the positions of the probes with the size of each fragment in bp shown in parentheses. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Prominent Free 5′ Ends of DNA in the NCR of Human mtDNA LM-PCR on samples of purified human 143B cell mtDNA from untreated cells (U) or cells amplifying mtDNA (A). (A) Free 5′ ends detected by various primer sets. Clusters I and II denote two sets of prominent free 5′ ends, see text for details. Equivalent experiments for HeLa cells gave the same products (data not shown). (1H) Primer set H1/H2/H3 for the H strand in the OH region. (2H) Primer set H4/H5/H6 for the H strand in the OH-distal portion of the NCR. (3H) Primer set H4/H5/H7 for the H strand downstream of the NCR. (4L) Primer set L1/L2/L3 for the L strand in the OH-distal portion of the NCR. Other L strand primer sets for the remainder of the NCR gave only faint, heterogeneous products (data not shown). Sequence ladders run adjacent to the LM-PCR products map the position of each band at the nucleotide level (greater separation of 5A-2H is shown in Figure S10). Based on Southern blot quantification (Figure S11), the ratio of U to A mtDNA was 1:1 in all subpanels. (B) Approximate positions of LM-PCR primers (lines with half-arrowhead) aligned against a linear map of the NCR (dark gray line) and cytochrome b gene (light gray line). Closed circles indicate radiolabeled primers. (C) Signal intensity by phosphorimaging of the bands from clusters I and II. The intensity of the band at nt 191 from untreated cells was arbitrarily set at one, with that of other bands expressed relative to this value. Each column represents the mean of five experiments, and error bars are standard deviations. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cluster II Free 5′ Ends Are More Transient Than Those of Cluster I, Particularly in Cells Amplifying mtDNA LM-PCR analysis of purified mtDNA from untreated 143B cells (U), cells amplifying mtDNA (A), cells treated with ddC (D), and linearized and gel-purified nonreplicating mtDNA (L). Clusters I and II are as described in the text. (A) H strand 5′ ends detected by primer sets H4/H5/H6 (lanes 1 and 3) or H8/H9/H6 (lanes 2 and 4). (B) The relative abundance of cluster I and cluster II 5′ ends based on phosphorimaging. Black and white bars indicate the prominent bands associated with primer set H4/H5/H6, hatched bars relate to primer set H8/H9/H6. The intensity of the band at nt 191 was arbitrarily set at one (lanes 1–4), with the intensity of other bands expressed relative to this value. (C) H strand 5′ ends detected in various DNA samples by using primer sets H1/H2/H3 (lanes 1 and 2) or H4/H5/H6 (lanes 3–6). Lanes 1 and 3, unfractionated 143B mtDNA template (U); lanes 2 and 4, linearized, nonreplicating mtDNA (L); lane 5, DNA from cells amplifying mtDNA (A); lane 6, DNA from cells treated with ddC for 72 hr with no recovery (D). 5′ ends at both clusters are diminished in nonreplicating mtDNA or mtDNA from ddC-treated cells, confirming their association with replication. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Models of mtDNA Replication in Cultured Human Cells (A–C) Bidirectional, strand-coupled replication. Synthesis initiates on the H strand most frequently at nt 16,197, as depicted in (A), or at one of the other cluster II sites (see Figure 5). Synthesis on the L strand initiates predominantly at nt 16,184. Early arrest of one replication fork (B) occurs at a termination site near OH (cluster I). H4 indicates the position of the initial primer used in the experiment of Figure 6A, lanes 1 and 3, located 0.5 kb downstream of the NCR, which detects cluster I and II 5′ ends. A primer 2.5 kb downstream of the NCR cannot bind the nascent strand at this stage. Once the nascent H strand reaches nt 13,493 (C), primer H8 can bind; however, by this stage the initiation site is no longer detectable because the first Okazaki fragment of the H strand has been synthesized at the oppositely moving fork and ligated to the 5′ end at the initiation site. In contrast, a lagging-strand initiation point opposite a leading-strand termination site creates a more persistent 5′ end (see also Figure S8C). This model can explain why primer H8, located 2.5 kb from the NCR (see Figures 6A and 6B), detects relatively more abundant free 5′ ends at cluster I than cluster II, whereas H4, which is 2 kb closer to the NCR, detects proportionately more cluster II 5′ ends. Closed black circles denote free 5′ ends of DNA; the closed black box represents the cluster of termination sites at OH. (D–F) The strand-asynchronous model. This model predicts free 5′ ends exclusively at OH on the H strand and on the L strand only at the “origin of light-strand replication,” (OL), nt 5,741–5,752. Molecular Cell 2005 18, 651-662DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.002) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions