ttbar + jets AOD analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exotica: Overview of the Searches for New Vector Boson High Mass States Cory Fantasia PY898 03/30/09.
Advertisements

Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Background studies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics May 6 th, 2010.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
TtH(H  bb) AOD-Based Analysis And DPD maker Simon Dean University College London ATLAS-UK Top Physics Meeting 17/09/2008.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
Top physics at startup CMS France – 1 er avril 2010 Anne-Catherine Le Bihan.
W→e and W→e +jets: a data-driven selection method By Alessandro Tricoli ATLAS UK SM Meeting 4 th June 2008 In Collaboration with M. Wielers (RAL) D. Prieur.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
1 H → γγ analysis Maosen Zhou 02/04/ For the coupling measurement,the categories are chosen to probe different Higgs production models,such as.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Hadronic Calibration Workshop Munich - May 06 D. Cavalli – S. Resconi 1  Performance (linearity, resolution, tails) studied on: -- Rome data  Many different.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
Top quark pair cross-section D0 (1 fb -1 results) Viatcheslav Sharyy for D0 collaborations CEA-Saclay / IRFU/ SPP ● Introduction ● Dilepton.
Slide 1 Status Report. Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
Report from SUSY working group
Multilepton production at HERA
CDS comments on supporting note
Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
D3PDs production+validation, preliminary TeV
H->ZZ->4l update
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Not-SUSY-Nor-Higgs Exotic Searches at TeVatron Run II
semileptonic ttbar + jet events
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
(Di-) Boson studies at ATLAS
ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
SUSY particles searches with R-parity violation at DØ, Tevatron
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

ttbar + jets AOD analysis fully- leptonic (e/μ)

semi- vs fully- leptonic events (5200 sample, tid=5997) # of events fully-leptonic semi-leptonic 4/5 1/5 remove tau events 8/15 4/45 electronic muonic ee μμ lepton universality eμ 4/15 4/15 1/45 2/45 1/45 more difficult to build up adequate statistics in fully leptonic channel (1/61/12 fewer events)

Aside: Sherpa fully-leptonic cross-sections order? CoM tt (pb) (ratio to 14TeV) tt + 1 jet (pb) 14 TeV 138.22 ± 0.16% 233.81 ± 1.0% 12 TeV 98.18 ± 0.15% (0.74) 154.23 ± 0.99% (0.66) 10 TeV 64.29 ± 0.16 (0.47) 92.09 ± 0.94 (0.39)

fullyleptonic channel ‘DPD’ maker *good lepton: remove electrons in crack region (1.37<|η|<1.52) isolation requirement ΣEtΔR<0.2 <6GeV fullyleptonic channel ‘DPD’ maker basic method: two high pt leptons of opposite sign two high pt jets considered to be b-jet triggers: PassedL1_e25i || PassedL1_mu20 || PassedL1_mu40 PassedL2_e25i || PassedL2_mu20i PassedEF_e25i || PassedEF_mu20i (|| dilepton trigger?) selection: ≥2 good* leptons Ptlep>20GeV , |ηlep|<2.5 Etmiss>25GeV ≥2 jets(ΔR=0.4) with Ptjet>20GeV , |ηjet|<2.5 remove same sign lepton events implemented in AOD

additional constraints for analysis lepton definitions electron can be loose (isEM&0x7==0), medium (isEM&0x3FF==0) or tight (isEM==0) muons have bestmatch (bestmatch==1), chisquared (matchchi2<100) or comb (matchchi2<100 && bestmatch==1) this choice affects the jet multiplicity which in turn has an effect on the muon isolation (no jet within ΔR<0.2) and additional cuts (Z peak & Etmiss>35GeV) on events currently using... ≥2 loose (or better) electrons || two comb muons* || one of each Etmiss>35GeV (same flavour), Etmiss>25GeV (diff. flavour) Z peak veto implemented in histogram code relaxed cuts on mixed events * muons now isolated

loose electrons with comb muons first analysis two triggers loose electrons with comb muons

subsample(% of sample) e25i (%) mu20i both total exclusive addition of 2e15 trigger trigger passes trigger subsample(% of sample) e25i (%) mu20i both total dielectron (2.1) 75.0 0.4 1.6 77.0 (78.0) dimuon (2.2) 82.2 0.2 82.4 mixed (4.4) 20.9 28.7 32.0 81.7 fulllep total (8.8) 28.6 35.5 16.6 80.7 (81.0) electron (27.2) 51.8 1.5 2.0 55.3 muon (26.4) 0.1 60.0 60.3 semlep total (53.5) 26.3 30.4 1.1 57.8 taus (37.7) 6.0 7.2 0.8 14.0

sub-selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS *all percentages relative to original subset exclusive sub-selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample trigger (%*) lep jet charge MET(%*) (25GeV) all dielectron 77.0 38.0 76.6 47.1 69.1 18.4 dimuon 82.4 42.6 71.1 77.8 75.7 29.7 mixed 81.7 36.6 79.0 70.6 74.2 30.4 fully leptonic 80.7 38.5 76.4 66.8 73.3 27.3 electron 55.3 5.4 55.2 2.9 muon 60.4 5.2 59.3 3.0 semi leptonic 57.8 2.3 26.0 taus 14.0 2.7 13.2 11.5 12.7 1.8

sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 loose el & ≥1 comb mu exclusive sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample pre- def (%) lep (%) jet charge MET Z-peak (%) all dielectron 18.4 17.7 11.8 16.7 16.1 14.4 8.9 dimuon 29.7 26.9 18.6 26.8 24.2 24.1 14.8 mixed 30.4 28.5 23.6 27.8 28.4 0.4 22.8 fully leptonic 27.3 25.5 19.5 24.9 24.4 9.8 17.4 electrons 2.9 2.3 2.2 1.2 0.1 1.1 muons 3.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 semi leptonic 2.1 1.5 2.0 0.6 taus 1.8 1.3 1.4 0.5 0.9

selection passes per channel WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS exclusive selection passes per channel WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron (%) muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 16.2 2.2 18.4 dimuon (2.2) 28.5 1.2 29.7 mixed (4.4) 0.2 0.3 29.9 30.4 fulllep total (8.8) 4.0 7.4 15.9 27.3 electron (27.2) 0.4 0.0 2.5 2.9 muon (26.4) 1.5 1.4 3.0 semlep total (53.5) 0.8 2.0 taus (37.7) 1.1 1.8

selection passes per channel WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 loose el & ≥1 comb mu exclusive selection passes per channel WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron (%) muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 8.7 0.2 8.9 dimuon (2.2) 14.5 0.3 14.8 mixed (4.4) 0.1 0.0 22.7 22.8 fulllep total (8.8) 2.1 3.7 11.6 17.4 electron (27.2) 1.1 1.2 muon (26.4) 0.7 0.4 semlep total (53.5) taus (37.7) 0.6 0.9

number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 loose el & ≥1 comb mu 20 pb-1 exclusive number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron events muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 16 1 17 dimuon (2.2) 30 31 mixed (4.4) 93 94 fulllep total (8.8) 142 electron (27.2) 3 27 muon (26.4) 18 10 semlep total (53.5) 37 57 taus (37.7) 4 7 20

medium electrons with comb muons first analysis two triggers medium electrons with comb muons

sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 medium els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 medium el & ≥1 comb mu exclusive sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample pre- def (%) lep (%) jet charge MET Z-peak (%) all dielectron 18.4 13.5 9.1 12.5 12.2 10.5 6.7 dimuon 29.7 26.7 18.7 26.6 24 24.2 15.1 mixed 30.4 23.9 19.7 23.6 23.8 0.3 19.1 fully leptonic 27.3 22.1 16.9 21.7 21.1 8.9 electrons 2.9 1.9 1.8 1.0 0.0 0.9 muons 3.0 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.8 semi leptonic 1.6 1.5 0.6 taus 0.5 0.7

number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 medium els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 medium el & ≥1 comb mu 20 pb-1 exclusive number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron events muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 12 1 13 dimuon (2.2) 31 mixed (4.4) 79 fulllep total (8.8) 80 123 electron (27.2) 23 muon (26.4) 18 2 20 semlep total (53.5) 25 44 taus (37.7) 3 7 15 24

tight electrons with comb muons first analysis two triggers tight electrons with comb muons

sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 tight els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 tight el & ≥1 comb mu exclusive sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample pre- def (%) lep (%) jet charge MET Z-peak (%) all dielectron 18.4 9.1 6.1 8.4 6.8 4.6 dimuon 29.7 26.5 18.7 23.8 24.4 15.1 mixed 30.4 19.8 16.3 19.6 19.7 0.4 15.8 fully leptonic 27.3 18.9 14.4 18.6 18.0 8.1 12.9 electrons 2.9 1.6 1.4 0.8 0.0 muons 3.0 1.3 1.1 semi leptonic 1.0 0.6 taus 1.8 0.7 0.9

number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 tight els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 tight el & ≥1 comb mu 20 pb-1 exclusive number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron events muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 8 1 9 dimuon (2.2) 31 mixed (4.4) 65 fulllep total (8.8) 66 105 electron (27.2) 19 muon (26.4) 20 semlep total (53.5) 21 40 taus (37.7) 2 7 12

conclusion ?

backups backups

fullyleptonic CSC recipe triggers: “a combination of single-lepton and di-lepton triggers”  eμ = 97%, ee = 98%, μμ = 96% (pre-)selection: 2 high pt leptons (20GeV) at least one electron is tight  remover fake leptons isolation of electrons, ΣEtΔR<0.2 <6GeV  remove semlep bestmatch muons muon isolation, remover muons closer than ΔR=0.2 to a jet ‘off-line’ selection: Z peak veto 15-95GeV exactly 2 leptons, at least two jets Etmiss ≥ 30GeV over all channels, ≥ 35GeV same flavor, ≥25GeV mixed

loose electron and comb muons + Z veto in AOD preselection first analysis two triggers loose electron and comb muons + Z veto in AOD preselection

selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS with Z veto in AOD exclusive selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron (%) muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 14.8 2.1 16.9 dimuon (2.2) 26.3 1.1 27.4 mixed (4.4) 0.2 0.3 30.4 29.4 fulllep total (8.8) 3.7 6.8 15.7 26.4 electron (27.2) 0.4 0.0 2.5 2.9 muon (26.4) 1.4 semlep total (53.5) 0.7 2.0 taus (37.7) 1.8

selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1loose el & ≥1 comb mu with Z veto in AOD exclusive selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron (%) muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 8.7 0.2 8.9 dimuon (2.2) 14.5 0.3 14.8 mixed (4.4) 0.1 0.0 22.7 22.8 fulllep total (8.8) 2.1 3.7 11.6 17.4 electron (27.2) 1.1 1.2 muon (26.4) 0.7 0.4 semlep total (53.5) taus (37.7) 0.6 0.9

first analysis three triggers

trigger passes with addition of 2e15 trigger exclusive trigger passes with addition of 2e15 trigger trigger subsample(% of sample) e25i (%) mu20i both 2e15 only (%) total dielectron (2.1) 75.0 0.4 1.6 0.9 78.0 dimuon (2.2) 82.2 0.2 82.4 mixed (4.4) 20.9 28.7 32.0 81.2 fulllep total (8.8) 28.6 35.5 16.6 81.0 electron (27.2) 51.8 1.5 2.0 55.3 muon (26.4) 0.1 60.0 60.3 semlep total (53.5) 26.3 30.4 1.1 57.8 taus (37.7) 6.0 7.2 0.8 14.0

loose electrons with comb muons first analysis two triggers loose electrons with comb muons +moved charge veto from AOD preselection

sub-selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS *all percentages relative to original subset exclusive sub-selection passes WITHOUT LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample trigger (%*) lep jet MET(%*) (25GeV) all dielectron 77.0 38.0 76.6 69.1 33.0 dimuon 82.4 42.6 71.1 75.7 33.7 mixed 81.7 36.6 79.0 74.2 32.8 fully leptonic 80.7 38.5 76.4 73.3 33.1 electron 55.3 5.4 55.2 4.5 muon 60.4 5.2 59.3 4.4 semi leptonic 57.8 2.3 26.0 taus 14.0 2.7 13.2 12.7 2.4

sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 loose el & ≥1 comb mu exclusive sub-selection passes WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS sub-sample pre- def (%) lep (%) jet charge MET Z-peak (%) all dielectron 33.0 32.0 23.8 31.1 29.0 28.1 17.5 dimuon 33.7 30.5 20.0 31.8 27.6 31.2 15 mixed 32.8 30.4 24.8 30.3 30.2 0.7 23.5 fully leptonic 33.1 30.8 23.3 30.9 29.3 15.1 19.9 electrons 4.5 3.2 2.9 1.8 3.3 0.8 1.4 muons 4.4 3.0 2.5 2.6 2.1 1.2 semi leptonic 3.1 2.7 2.8 1.5 1.3 taus 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.0

number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS ≥2 loose els / ≥2 comb mus / ≥1 loose el & ≥1 comb mu 20 pb-1 exclusive number of selected events WITH LEPTON DEFINITIONS selection subsample(% of sample) electron events muon mixed total dielectron (2.1) 33 1 34 dimuon (2.2) 30 31 mixed (4.4) 97 fulllep total (8.8) 98 162 electron (27.2) 7 29 36 muon (26.4) 18 11 semlep total (53.5) 40 65 taus (37.7) 8 20