The Proposed Fish Habitat Management Regime for Yukon Placer Mining

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measure 76 Parks and Natural Resources Fund 15% Lottery Revenue Parks Subaccount Natural Resources Subaccount Grant Fund 65% Operating Fund 35%
Advertisements

Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Meeting with stakeholders 2 May Ms Mary Lack (Chair), Director, Shellack Pty Ltd Dr Catherine Bulman, Research Scientist, CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric.
Research, Citizen Involvement, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Jack Sullivan Science Services Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Bay Bank The Chesapeake’s Ecosystem Service Marketplace.
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Natura 2000 Funding Opportunities under EMFF Regulation for Damien Clarke Managing Authority – EFF / EMFF
MARTIN TSAMENYI (Ghana) SWGSM Chair THE 19th SPECIAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ATLANTIC TUNAS (Genoa, Italy,
Environmental Management Services
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Funded by the Government of Alberta Ecosystem Services and Conservation Offsets April 24 th, 2012.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
DECISION-MAKING, FOLLOW-UP AND ENFORCEMENT OCTOBER 15, 2012.
Defining Roles and Responsibilities for the New College Health Nurse through Standardized Nursing Competencies Doreen Perez MS RN BC Carol Kozel BSN RN.
Stakeholder Committee’s Role. The Stakeholder Committee’s role in Adaptive Management Decision process (AMP) and the HCP Program as follows: Per Funding.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Alberta’s strategy for sustainability APEGGA February 17, 2004.
North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative
Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Snohomish County Planning Commission Briefing August 26,
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
6Standards for the planning, design and construction of ports and terminals OBJECTIVE: To ensure that Ports and Terminals are planned, designed and constructed.
VII. COLLABORATION/DELEGA TION A. DEFINED UNIT two: STRATEGIES for PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Ecosystem Restoration Program Focused Proposal Solicitation Package 2010/2011 Prepared by ERP Implementing Agencies: California Department of Fish & Game.
Establishing Successful Community-Based Partnerships Craig L. Fleener.
Steven Murawski Director of Scientific Programs & Chief Science Advisor, NOAA Fisheries Service & NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead NRC - Ocean Studies Board.
Forest Planning and IRWMPs in the Sierra Nevada Sue Britting June 11, 2013.
Strengthening the Science-Management Bond in the Wildlife Profession Eric Hellgren Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Origin  On October 18, 1997 – 25 th Anniversary of Clean Water Act – Federal agencies were asked to rededicate their efforts to cleaning up the Nations.
Sharing Personal Information Programme Health and Social Care Joint Conference February 2011 David Middleton SPI Branch.
NEI Cumulative Effect Thresholds Project 1 AGENDA  Overview  Kaska Planning Process  North Yukon Planning Process  Building Tools and Thresholds I.Wildlife.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting Cambridge Bay, NU January 28-29,
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
Groundwater Sustainability
The Endangered Species Act
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Jason Clingerman, Aquatic Ecologist
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Feedback received on the establishment of fisheries management measures in Natura 2000 sites (Document 4.1) Exchange information on ongoing activities.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
5/1/2019 3:12 AM SHARED STEWARDSHIP STABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY IN ALLOCATION November 26, 2010 Vancouver.
CBP Organizational Structure
Yves Goulet Director, National Fisheries Intelligence Service
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
Roles and Responsibilities
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

The Proposed Fish Habitat Management Regime for Yukon Placer Mining ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT The Proposed Fish Habitat Management Regime for Yukon Placer Mining uses an adaptive management approach. Adaptive Management is a systematic scientific process for continually improving management polices and practices by learning from management experience. Adaptive Management recognizes that the effectiveness of any management regime is hampered by a degree of uncertainty and lack of knowledge. It seeks to improve the Regime by monitoring the effects of management actions, in order to learn from the results. In the case of the proposed Regime, Adaptive Management will require the monitoring of water quality, aquatic health and industry health. Monitoring results should provide new information and a rational basis for making adjustments to habitat conservation and protection measures over time. High quality monitoring data from both successes and failures is key to making improvements. Each monitoring program will follow approved protocols, in order to increase the reliability of the results. Careful annual monitoring will form the basis of recommendations for change. Before adjustments can be considered, several years of monitoring will likely be required. The Adaptive Management approach includes six steps: - Assess or define the problem. - Design the management actions and the monitoring program. - Implement the management actions. - Monitor the outcomes. - Evaluate the results. - Adjust management actions, if necessary, in response to new information.

The Proposed Fish Habitat Management Regime for Yukon Placer Mining The key questions to be answered for this Regime through Adaptive Management are: - Does the Regime conserve and protect fish and fish habitat supporting fisheries, resulting in no net loss of habitat? - Does the Regime maintain the viability of placer mining? Adaptive Management – How It Will Work - Review reports from three effects-monitoring programs - Apply decision rules - Publish annual report - Make recommendations respecting monitoring programs or regulatory instruments to relevant agency - Decisions related to monitoring programs will be made by the responsible agency - Decisions related to watershed authorizations will be made by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans - Decisions related to water use licenses and placer mining land use approvals will be made by the Yukon Water Board