AQ Review and Revision Processes & Development of the Current Regime

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Advertisements

AQ Appeals and the BTU form Chris Warner. 2 AQ Appeals and the BTU form  Presentation reflects NGD’s view of UNC regime as drafted and is intended to.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
UNC Review Group 0178 National Grid Distribution “Reclassification of SSP to Domestic only” Review Group Meeting – 22 February 2008 Chris Warner.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –26 th November 2009 Distribution Workstream.
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement - Update
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
Incentives 26 September 2018.
Amendment to NEA & NExA Measurement Provisions Change Process
UNC Modification – Non Effective Days
Reduction of Exit Capacity at DM Supply Points
Project Nexus Workgroup
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Modification Proposal 0283
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Impacts of Project Nexus Implementation Date to AQ17
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
UNC Modification Proposal 0172 National Grid Distribution
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
XRN4790 – Introduction of winter read/consumption reports
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Project Nexus Workgroup
Meter Data Publication Timing
Actions for Mod209 Workgroup
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Lessons Learnt UKLC - November 2015
Joint Theft Reporting Review (from meeting 1st March 2019)
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009
DN Interruption Phase II
AQ Threshold Analysis Steve Taylor Centrica plc.
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Introduction
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Meter Reads.
Project Nexus Workgroup
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update for April & May 2019
> < > < ≥ ≤ Shot at 90% Larger Smaller Larger
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

AQ Review and Revision Processes & Development of the Current Regime Review Group 0168

AQ Review, Amendment and Appeal Timeline

AQ Amendment Restrictions (in addition to those detailed on timeline) Reasonable belief that meter readings used are incorrect, more recent readings are now available or meter details are incorrect. (G1.6.4(b)) except if the AQ is carried over from the previous year where no such restriction applies (G1.6.2(b)(ii)) Consistent application of calculation methodology and submission of all amendment requests where appropriate, regardless of whether the AQ is greater or less than the provisional value notified. (G1.6.4(c)) For a Smaller Supply Points, the change (reduction or increase) must be =>20% (G1.6.4(a)) Unless the change would move a Smaller Supply Point to the Larger Supply Point sector (G1.6.4(e)) where no such % restriction applies

AQ Appeal Restrictions (in addition to those detailed on timeline) For Larger Supply Points (LSPs) On the basis of consumption evidence in which case the appeal must be made between D-7 and D+23 business days (G1.6.13(a)(i)) On the basis of a change to the consumers plant which changes the way gas is consumed (G1.6.13(a)(ii)) Aside from the above, in respect all Supply Points the User may appeal the AQ For an LSP where the proposed value is <=50% or =>200% of the AQ (G1.6.13(b)(i)) For a Smaller Supply Point where the User considers it should be an LSP (G1.6.13(b)(ii))

Network Code and UNC Development (1)

Network Code and UNC Development (2)

Network Code and UNC Development (3)