Xing Hua, Haiming Xu, Yaning Yang, Jun Zhu, Pengyuan Liu, Yan Lu 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Previous Estimates of Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Level Variance Did Not Account for Sampling Error: Comparing the mtDNA Genetic Bottleneck in Mice and.
Advertisements

Sensitivity Analysis of the MGMT-STP27 Model and Impact of Genetic and Epigenetic Context to Predict the MGMT Methylation Status in Gliomas and Other.
Comparison of Clinical Targeted Next-Generation Sequence Data from Formalin-Fixed and Fresh-Frozen Tissue Specimens  David H. Spencer, Jennifer K. Sehn,
Sensitivity Analysis of the MGMT-STP27 Model and Impact of Genetic and Epigenetic Context to Predict the MGMT Methylation Status in Gliomas and Other.
Assessing Copy Number Alterations in Targeted, Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Data  Catherine Grasso, Timothy Butler, Katherine Rhodes, Michael.
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Marc A. Coram, Huaying Fang, Sophie I. Candille, Themistocles L
Jacek Majewski  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
K. Alaine Broadaway, David J. Cutler, Richard Duncan, Jacob L
CHEK2*1100delC and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer: A Collaborative Analysis Involving 10,860 Breast Cancer Cases and 9,065 Controls from 10 Studies 
Reliable Identification of Genomic Variants from RNA-Seq Data
Abdul K. Siraj, Tariq Masoodi, Rong Bu, Shaham Beg, Saif S
Huwenbo Shi, Nicholas Mancuso, Sarah Spendlove, Bogdan Pasaniuc 
Haplotype Estimation Using Sequencing Reads
Thomas Willems, Melissa Gymrek, G
Evolutionary Rewiring of Human Regulatory Networks by Waves of Genome Expansion  Davide Marnetto, Federica Mantica, Ivan Molineris, Elena Grassi, Igor.
Brian K. Maples, Simon Gravel, Eimear E. Kenny, Carlos D. Bustamante 
Zheng-Zheng Tang, Dan-Yu Lin  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Rounak Dey, Ellen M. Schmidt, Goncalo R. Abecasis, Seunggeun Lee 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Alternative Splicing QTLs in European and African Populations
Gene-Expression Variation Within and Among Human Populations
Arpita Ghosh, Fei Zou, Fred A. Wright 
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
XMCPDT Does Have Correct Type I Error Rates
Jingjing Li, Xiumei Hong, Sam Mesiano, Louis J
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
HYST: A Hybrid Set-Based Test for Genome-wide Association Studies, with Application to Protein-Protein Interaction-Based Association Analysis  Miao-Xin.
Variant Association Tools for Quality Control and Analysis of Large-Scale Sequence and Genotyping Array Data  Gao T. Wang, Bo Peng, Suzanne M. Leal  The.
A Flexible Bayesian Framework for Modeling Haplotype Association with Disease, Allowing for Dominance Effects of the Underlying Causative Variants  Andrew.
A Subset-Based Approach Improves Power and Interpretation for the Combined Analysis of Genetic Association Studies of Heterogeneous Traits  Samsiddhi.
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Maximizing the Power of Principal-Component Analysis of Correlated Phenotypes in Genome-wide Association Studies  Hugues Aschard, Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson,
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Previous Estimates of Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Level Variance Did Not Account for Sampling Error: Comparing the mtDNA Genetic Bottleneck in Mice and.
Random-Effects Model Aimed at Discovering Associations in Meta-Analysis of Genome- wide Association Studies  Buhm Han, Eleazar Eskin  The American Journal.
Meta-analysis of Correlated Traits via Summary Statistics from GWASs with an Application in Hypertension  Xiaofeng Zhu, Tao Feng, Bamidele O. Tayo, Jingjing.
Taming Human Genetic Variability: Transcriptomic Meta-Analysis Guides the Experimental Design and Interpretation of iPSC-Based Disease Modeling  Pierre-Luc.
Jeffrey Staples, Dandi Qiao, Michael H. Cho, Edwin K
Family-Based Association Studies for Next-Generation Sequencing
Characteristics of Neutral and Deleterious Protein-Coding Variation among Individuals and Populations  Wenqing Fu, Rachel M. Gittelman, Michael J. Bamshad,
Matthieu Foll, Oscar E. Gaggiotti, Josephine T
A Powerful Approach to Estimating Annotation-Stratified Genetic Covariance via GWAS Summary Statistics  Qiongshi Lu, Boyang Li, Derek Ou, Margret Erlendsdottir,
Rare-Variant Association Testing for Sequencing Data with the Sequence Kernel Association Test  Michael C. Wu, Seunggeun Lee, Tianxi Cai, Yun Li, Michael.
Johanna Jakobsdottir, Mary Sara McPeek 
Yu Jiang, Yujun Han, Slavé Petrovski, Kouros Owzar, David B
Estimating Genetic Effects and Quantifying Missing Heritability Explained by Identified Rare-Variant Associations  Dajiang J. Liu, Suzanne M. Leal  The.
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Varying Intolerance of Gene Pathways to Mutational Classes Explain Genetic Convergence across Neuropsychiatric Disorders  Shahar Shohat, Eyal Ben-David,
An Efficient Multiple-Testing Adjustment for eQTL Studies that Accounts for Linkage Disequilibrium between Variants  Joe R. Davis, Laure Fresard, David A.
Female-to-Male Breeding Ratio in Modern Humans—an Analysis Based on Historical Recombinations  Damian Labuda, Jean-François Lefebvre, Philippe Nadeau,
Huwenbo Shi, Gleb Kichaev, Bogdan Pasaniuc 
Wei Pan, Il-Youp Kwak, Peng Wei  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Jared R. Kohler, David J. Cutler 
James M. Flanagan, Sibylle Cocciardi, Nic Waddell, Cameron N
Patterns of Somatically Acquired Amplifications and Deletions in Apparently Normal Tissues of Ovarian Cancer Patients  Leila Aghili, Jasmine Foo, James.
Unified Sequence-Based Association Tests Allowing for Multiple Functional Annotations and Meta-analysis of Noncoding Variation in Metabochip Data  Zihuai.
Xiang Wan, Can Yang, Qiang Yang, Hong Xue, Xiaodan Fan, Nelson L. S
Pleiotropic Effects of Trait-Associated Genetic Variation on DNA Methylation: Utility for Refining GWAS Loci  Eilis Hannon, Mike Weedon, Nicholas Bray,
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing: Weighing the Demand against the Benefits
Inclusion of Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions Unlikely to Dramatically Improve Risk Prediction for Complex Diseases  Hugues Aschard, Jinbo.
Tao Wang, Robert C. Elston  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Xing Hua, Haiming Xu, Yaning Yang, Jun Zhu, Pengyuan Liu, Yan Lu 
Functional Architectures of Local and Distal Regulation of Gene Expression in Multiple Human Tissues  Xuanyao Liu, Hilary K. Finucane, Alexander Gusev,
Genotype-Imputation Accuracy across Worldwide Human Populations
Harold A. Nieuwboer, René Pool, Conor V. Dolan, Dorret I
Leveraging Multi-ethnic Evidence for Mapping Complex Traits in Minority Populations: An Empirical Bayes Approach  Marc A. Coram, Sophie I. Candille, Qing.
Quanhe Yang, W. Dana Flanders, Ramal Moonesinghe, John P. A
Michael P. Epstein, Richard Duncan, Erin B. Ware, Min A
Bruce Rannala, Jeff P. Reeve  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Presentation transcript:

DrGaP: A Powerful Tool for Identifying Driver Genes and Pathways in Cancer Sequencing Studies  Xing Hua, Haiming Xu, Yaning Yang, Jun Zhu, Pengyuan Liu, Yan Lu  The American Journal of Human Genetics  Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 439-451 (September 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003 Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of DrGaP Analysis Pipeline The core of the pipeline includes input of tumor mutation data, sequencing analysis of somatic mutations, tabulation of somatic variants, significance test of driver genes and pathways, and summary and output of results. Dashed lines indicate optional steps. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Parameter Estimation and Type I Error in DrGaP (A and B) Parameter estimation of η and α. (C–E) Distribution of p values from different likelihood ratio statistics: LRT-M, LRT-C, and LRT-S. (F) Q-Q plot of uniform distribution [0, 1] and p values from LRT-C under null hypothesis. LRT-M refers to LRT test jointly considering multiple types of mutation without estimating ε; LRT-C refers to LRT test jointly considering multiple types of mutations and correcting mixture proportion of chi-square distribution by estimating ε. LRT-S refers to LRT test considering a single type of mutation. That is, multiple types of mutations are summed into a single type in LRT-S. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Statistical Power of Three Statistics in DrGaP (A) Only one type of driver mutation occurred in tumors. (B) Five of 11 types of driver mutations occurred in tumors. (C) All 11 types of driver mutations occurred in tumors. For comparison, the total driver mutation rates are equal among the three scenarios; the mutation rates of individual types are also equal in the latter two scenarios. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Impact of Background Mutation Rate on Likelihood Ratio Statistics Lower background mutation (η) often leads to a larger estimate of the mixture proportion of chi-square distribution (ε). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 ROC Plots of Sensitivity and Specificity of Six Statistical Methods under Different Tumor Mutation Patterns (A) Only one type of driver mutation occurred in tumors. (B) Five of 11 types of driver mutations occurred in tumors. (C) All 11 types of driver mutations occurred in tumors. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Driver Mutated Genes in the Study Ding et al.17 Tumor samples with or without mutations in genes are labeled green or red, respectively. The red/blue/yellow banner across the left side of the map shows the difference between genes selected by DrGaP and those selected by the other methods (Ding et al.17 and Youn and Simon24). The genes covered by the red bar are identified by the Ding/Youn methods but are missed by DrGaP and those covered by the yellow bar are the additional genes found by DrGaP. The genes covered by the blue bar are those which both DrGaP and Ding/Youn’s methods find significant. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Numbers of Driver Mutated Genes per Tumor in TCGA Data Sets LUAD, LUSC, nonhypermutated CRC, and HGS-OvCa. Genes with <5% FDR from DrGaP are presented in the above studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93, 439-451DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.003) Copyright © 2013 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions