Joint Experiment IOS-4.1 Aims:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.

Advertisements

Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)

R Sartori - page 1 20 th IAEA Conference – Vilamoura Scaling Studies of ELMy H-modes global and pedestal confinement at high triangularity in JET R Sartori.

Optimizing General Compiler Optimization M. Haneda, P.M.W. Knijnenburg, and H.A.G. Wijshoff.

XP810 and 801 report, Feb 08 slide 1 Buttery, Gerhardt, La Haye, Sabbagh June 2008 reporting meeting – XP810 and 801 experiment: 801: Marginal island width.

POLICY ANALYSIS WHAT IS IT? HOW DO WE DO IT? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?

IOS-5.2 Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime Spokes person: M. Goniche M.-L. Mayoral (JET), R. Pinsker (DIII-D), L. Colas (TS), V. Bobkov.

C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.

Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.

M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.

ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.

Measurement Requirements and Assessment of Measurement Capability David Johnson, Réjean Boivin, Ken Young.

Title – Arial between 80 and 100pt Authors names Arial 50pt, A. N Other 1, 1 Associations Arial 28 pt 2 EURATOM/Culham Fusion Association, Culham Science.

L-H threshold database: Status and Plans J.W. Hughes, J. Stillerman, MIT PSFC Y. Martin, CRPP-EPFL P. Gohil, GA D. McDonald, JET-EFDA Meeting of the ITPA.

High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.

FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.

E. Doyle (Chair), V. Mukhovatov (Co-chair) for the ITPA Transport Physics Group 2nd IEA Large Tokamak Workshop on Implementation of the ITPA Coordinated.

Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA Remaining duties ITPA CC meeting & IEA/ITPA JE planning meeting –12 – 14 (15) December 2011, Cadarache –Ide, Sips and.

Hysteresis in the L-H-L transition, D C McDonald, ITPA, Princeton 20091/22 Hysterics in the L-H transition D C McDonald.

ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.

JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)

DISCUSSION OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ROTATION AND MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SESSIONS 10th ITPA Transport Physics and CDBM TG Meetings Princeton.

Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,

ISM Working Group 1 ITPA meeting 24 th March 2010 Modelling of JET, Tore Supra and Asdex Upgrade current ramp-up experiments F. Imbeaux, F. Köchl, D. Hogeweij,

SUMMARY OF 4th IPTA TRANSPORT AND ITB PHYSICS TG MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, April 8-11, 2003 Presented by E.J. Doyle for the TG Note: this summary.

Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.

T. Bolzonella – 9 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF1: Physics integration for high performance RFP Proposals and discussion T. Bolzonella,

Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,

Status of NSTX/DIII-D/MAST aspect ratio core confinement comparison studies M. Peng, for E.J. Synakowski For the ITPA Transport Physics Working Group Kyota,

如何利用图书馆 ——— 海南师范大学图书馆（ 2014 ） ——— 海南师范大学图书馆（ 2014 ）

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.

The design cycle model and the design process.

New NSW Geography syllabus 7-10

Field-Particle Correlation Experiments on DIII-D Frontiers Science Proposal Under weakly collisional conditions, collisionless interactions between electromagnetic.

An Error Analysis of Dimensionless Confinement Scaling Experiments

+ large local teams in each tokamak not listed here

T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX), S

Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line

DIII-D Frontiers Science Proposal Template

Victorian Curriculum: F-10 Visual Arts

THE BUSINESS ANALYSIS PROCESS MODEL

The Q Improvement Lab August 2017.

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Stage 1 and 2 Mentor Training

L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.

The planning based on the new curriculum

Evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of change plans

Advanced Scenarios: ITER-like Hybrid at Low Bt without LH

A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John

Heat flux width scaling in ITER limiter configurations

LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010

Turning data insights into action

TC-2 – Power ratio April 2011, San Diego

Lower Ip Long Pulse H+ITB Advanced Scenarios

Methane Screening on C-MOD EDA ELM-mitigated Plasmas Jim Strachan, PPPL Nov. 30, 2004 Goal: compare impurity behavior in ELM mitigated plasmas – ergodic.

49th Annual Meeting of APS - DPP Orlando, 11/14/2007

Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018

WGCapD Perspectives of Work Plan –

Lower Ip Long Pulse L-mode and H-mode Advanced Scenarios

NTM Stability at Low Collisionality

IOS-6.3: Control of experimentally simulated burning state

Continued exploration of pedestal structure and edge relaxation mechanisms at lower edge collisionality J.W. Hughes, A. Hubbard, B. LaBombard, J. Terry,

THE PROCESS OF INTERACTION DESIGN

NorWays “Providing decision support for introduction of Hydrogen in the Norwegian energy system” 3 år ( ) Totalbudsjett ~ 6,9mill NOK Partnere:

No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios

AGS A Level 20 marker Feedback sheet

Tricky issues with your research

Searching for Federal Funding

Writing competence based questions

Presentation transcript:

Joint Experiment IOS-4.1 Aims: Access conditions for advanced inductive (hybrid) scenario with ITER-relevant restriction Key persons: E. Joffrin (JET) P Politzer + G. Jackson (DIII-D) J. Hobirk (AUG) A. Hubbard (C-MOD) T. Suzuki (JT60U) Gerhardt (NSTX) Aims: Document plasma conditions to obtain a selected number of q profiles for the hybrid scenario at bN close to 3 Document experimentally in each device the effect of q profile on confinement and stability before current profile relaxes.

DIII-D / JET Experiment Reminder of previous work: List of physics parameters for the documentation discussed and circulated Database produced in JET and DIII-D separately (presented at the Culham meeting). JET database now in the hands of GA, since last week. Discussion have started with J. Hobirk. DIII-D database extended to hybrid scenario (action from previous meeting) JET database analysed in terms of q95. Key issues: 1- What is the best criteria for defining success? bN>2.3 is incomplete since it could be achieved at high power with poor confinement (with MHD for example). The confinement alone does not tell you about the maximum pressure. bNmax.<H> could offer an alternative between these 2 conditions

Performance as function of q95: The initial li may impact on steady state (in red) performance. High initial li seems favorable. a large variety of initial target has been explored for the steady state. Low initial q looks more favorable. Hybrids and steady state are achieving similar performance in the same domain. bNmax.<H> Li (target at 95% of Ip ramp) q95- qo (target) 3.5<q95<4.5 4.5<q95<5.5 <H> time averaged over the duration when bN>1.5

Li (target at 95% of Ip ramp) Ip overshoot seem to produce the best performance bNmax.H Li (target at 95% of Ip ramp)

What experiment can we draw from the data base analysis? This point is not directly obvious from the database analysis from one single machine and combining results may shed some light on the q profile access since operating conditions are usually different A possible but academic way forward could be to merge the experimental objectives of 3.2 and 4.1 and develop an JE that focuses on reproducing 3 classes of identical target q profiles in the different machines: (qo~1, q95=4) ; (qo~1, q95=5) (qo>2, q95=5) at different b values from 2.5 to 4 and on short duration (<tR/2). This would have the objective to document the physics continuum in the (q,P) space independently from a particular scenario. Evidence are suggesting that “broad” profiles is favourable (DIII-D, JET, AUG). So another option could be to focus on identical “broad” q profile target with qo>~1 + q95~4 and q>2+q95~5 (using for example the current overshoot) which has been tried in different way on JET and AUG already to explore its impact on stability / transport on short duration (<tR/2) when bN (power) is increased. The proposal is to: Overlay the DIII-D and JET database data and possibly AUG data. Write the design of an experiment for an identity q profile experiment using the Ip overshoot for both q95=4 and 5.