Provider, Supervision & QC Codes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAP/POCT 2003 Carol Riley-Hunte, RRT Senior Education Specialist Bayer HealthCare.
Advertisements

PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
TRAINING FOR THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL COURSE CURRICULUM MODULE 1Introduction MODULE 2Laws & Regulations MODULE 3Enforcement Procedures MODULE.
System Construction and Implementation Objectives:
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
HERD TESTING IN THE US AND THE ROLE OF QC– SIEVERT 2010 Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA/DHIA Services Manager, Quality Certification.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES & ACCREDITATION An Overview OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
QC/QA Mary Malarkey Director, Division of Case Management Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research March.
The purpose of SOP is to describe the Performance of a controlled process and if it is written to fulfill only that purpose efficiently and effectively,
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Understanding the National Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures (Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures) April 2014.
Bodil Mose Pedersen, DHI Status for implementering af ”Quality Manual”
Rigging Requirements Part L “Cranes” and Part F-1 “NOT CRANES” Construction Safety Standard WAC Brad Solheim Department of Labor & Industries Crane.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Office/index.cfm.
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department Performance Test Specifics Rob Arpino Environmental Engineering Specialist.
November 27, 2007Pebble Project Agency Meetings Pebble Project Data Management Data Management Responsibilities Ensure complete and accurate field and.
G. R. Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD M. A. Faust ABS Global,
Safety organization and training. The biosafety officer and biosafety committee A safety policy, A safety manual, and Supporting programmes for their.
MFIRS 11 Arson Module. 2 Objectives The participants will be able to: The participants will be able to: describe when the Arson Module (NFIRS 11) is to.
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.
Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.
Bina Nusantara 19 C H A P T E R SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
24 Nov 2007Data Management and Exploratory Data Analysis 1 Yongyuth Chaiyapong Ph.D. (Mathematical Statistics) Department of Statistics Faculty of Science.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to share with you our process for controlling media and other supplies. Disclaimer: We are not yet accredited to ISO.
14 March 2002Update on SDoC - USA1 Update on Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity – USA William Hurst Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering.
ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation.
Post-Secondary Transition
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 4 GMP – Documentation Part I (SOP)
Auditing Procedures for Meter Centers and Technicians
How a member does the assessment and certifies
Calibration of Portable Scales
Auditing Information Technology
Software and Systems Integration
CQA Producer Registration System
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
Internal Controls.
ISO 9001 Awareness Training.
Quality Assurance: Pay Factors and Dispute Resolution
Maintaining quality data throughout the life of a project
What is the UL QFCP? FCIA Webinar Presenters:
Good Laboratory Practices
HEDIS® Compliance Audit™ and Supplemental data
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Systems Construction and Implementation
AS 9100 Awareness Training.
Performance Management Training
System Construction and Implementation
Systems Construction and Implementation
Meter Center & Technician Update
Denmark – DHI technical update
Access and Use of Data Field Service Advisory Committee Meeting
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Field Service Update Field Service Advisory Committee March 5, 2019
ICS Staff One person is responsible for overall ICS and can delegate the responsibilities so that for each procedure or task of the ICS, one person is.
Internal Control Internal control is the process designed and affected by owners, management, and other personnel. It is implemented to address business.
Internal Controls.
National Visitor Use Monitoring
Internal Controls.
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

Provider, Supervision & QC Codes Field Service Advisory Committee Meeting March 5, 2019 Steven Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA

Important Variables to Describe Current Coding Herd Code Field Service, Meter Center and Laboratory Codes Supervision Code QC Code Work Completed – Weighed, Sampled, MRD Future Needs Coding by Strings or Pens Equipment Type or Code (Meter, Sensor Name) Milking System Description Herd Management Descriptors

Herd Code Blocks Assigned by National DHIA Office Blocks assigned to field service affiliates Third parties (VAS) have been assigned blocks of herd codes Heifer growers may be using specific herd codes for record keeping Non-processed herds at each affiliate that may be using a specific herd code Auto incrementing of herd codes is not an option Herd Code Assignment

Herd Code Assignment A new herd assigned when… New ownership of herd but at same location The herd moves to a new location (state, county, etc.) Do not assign a new herd code when… Herd transfers from one affiliate to another and/or another DRPC It may be quicker than obtaining intent to transfer and release for the herd but is not in compliance with UOP Herd Code Assignment

Provider Codes References Field Service 021 Meter Centers 921 Labs 821 Code is associated with the state where your office is located Meter Centers Meter center codes range from 900-999 Independent goat meters/scales: 998 EMM calibrated by third party: 999 Labs Lab codes range from 800-899 Provider Codes References Field Service 021 Meter Centers 921 Labs 821 Codes assigned by National DHIA Listed on QCS website for certified providers Allows for data exclusion from provider not certified for a specific period

DHI Supervision Codes Reference 108 Description Not used 1 Supervisor conducted test 2 Owner conducted test 3 Both supervisor and owner conducted test 4 Automated Milking System 5 Supervisor conducted test using electronic recording 6 Owner conducted test using electronic recording 7 Both supervisor and owner conducted test using electronic recording 8 Verification test not using electronic recording 9 Verification test using electronic recording DHI Supervision Codes Reference 108

DHI Supervision Codes Herds with Manual Yield Recording   Supervised Test: All test day production data and cow identification has been recorded by the DHI technician who is expected to collect data as accurately as possible and to use approved procedures when taking milk samples. The DHI technician may employ assistants to perform these tasks when the facilities or milking processes do not permit a single DHI technician to observe identification, milk weights, and sample collection as they occur. (Supervision Code 1) Unsupervised Test: Test day production data and/or cow identification has been recorded by someone other than the DHI technician. (Supervision Code 2) Partially Supervised Test: The DHI technician collected production data and/or cow identification information for at least one milking on test day and someone else collected production information and cow identification for other milking(s) on test day. The DHI technician certifies that the test day information is believed to be correct and accurate. (Supervision Code 3)

DHI Supervision Codes Robotic Herds   Automatic Milking System Test: Test day production data and/or cow identification has been recorded by an automatic/robotic milking system. Milk has been sampled using an automatic sampling device approved to provide representative samples when used with the automatic milking system. (Supervision Code 4)

DHI Supervision Codes Herds with Electronic Yield Recording   Supervised Electronic test: The DHI technician performed a supervised test using the electronic recording of production data and cow identification together with appropriate verification that equipment for cow identification, weighing milk, and obtaining milk samples is in proper operating condition and is accurate. (Supervision Code 5) Unsupervised Electronic Test: Test day production and cow identification has been collected using electronic recording and is submitted for processing without verification by a DHI technician. (Supervision Code 6) Partially Supervised electronic test: The DHI technician performed a Supervised Electronic Test, but cow identification was manually entered by farm employees. (Supervision Code 7)

Quality Certification Codes Reference 118 Description 1 All data (event, yield, components) are used MEETS ALL QC 2 Event data and yield are used but components are not used METERS ARE CERTIFIED, LAB IS NOT 3 Event data is used but yield and components are not used METERS DO NOT MEET QC 4 The data (event, yield, components) do not meet QC and are not used DOES NOT MEET QC Quality Certification Codes Reference 118

Quality Certification Codes Reference 118 QC Codes are currently applied to the herd (all cows under herd code) Allow for usable data to be used for management and genetic purposes Field Service Provider indicates the effective date(s) of the proper QC Code to DRPC – this includes changing back to QC Code = 1 During audit, QCS may indicate the proper code should be applied to a herd for all or specific test days but communication responsibility falls with field services. QCS is working with CDCB to validate proper application and use Application to data from sensor devices is possible in future Quality Certification Codes Reference 118

Future Herd Descriptors Needed Coding by Strings or Pens Different milking frequencies, supervision, etc. for different pens, parlors, sites Equipment Type or Code (Meter, Sensor Name) Need to know source of data as we may have the same data (i.e. SCC) coming from different equipment Milking System Description Rotary, Parallel, Stall Barn, etc. In-Line Sensors Herd Management Description Seasonal calving, grazing, confinement, etc. Others?

Primary Herd Characteristics Characterize Data by Strings or Pens Possible Option of Secondary Characteristics such as Robot Model or Sensor Name

Coding System for Recording Devices ICAR Sensor Devices Task Force Working on a uniform coding system for recording and sampling devices Would include current meters – both portable and fixed/in-place Sensor devices/systems would have codes that are unique to system, software version, and measurements collected Includes devices for measuring milk yield & estimating milk composition but also devices that measure activity, BCS, feed efficiency metrics, and other live animal measurements One system that databases and DRPCs could reference Coding System for Recording Devices

Take Home Points Need to accurately describe/code test day and data sources Has to be a cooperative effort with field service, DRPC and National DHIA National DHIA is working with CDCB to ensure proper data handling and usage based on descriptive coding We will need to expand the capture of herd descriptive information to meet future needs Multi-site dairies Sensor devices Provide qualified data for management and genetic research and reporting