Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology A clinical distance measure for evaluating treatment plan quality difference with Pareto fronts in radiotherapy  Kristoffer Petersson, Archonteia Kyroudi, Jean Bourhis, Crister Ceberg, Tommy Knöös, François Bochud, Raphaël Moeckli  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 3, Pages 53-56 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2017.09.003 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 2D Pareto fronts, sub-optimal treatment plans, and results from the clinical grading analysis (CGA) for each of the five prostate cases and all cases together (bottom right). Open diamonds means that sub-optimal plans were considered as clinically equivalent to the reference Pareto plans (squares), light-filled as worse, and dark-filled as much worse. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 3, 53-56DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions