“Choice Theories” Historical Context of Choice Theories

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2  Individuals who are caught and sanctioned by the criminal justice system will be less likely to re-offend  Does prison reduce recidivism?  Do.
Advertisements

Lesson 4 – Classical Approach and Rational Choice Robert Wonser Introduction to Criminology Crime and Delinquency 1.
Weak empirical support If anything, the certainty of punishment may have marginal effects on crime WHY SO WEAK? Based on “weak” theory—weak assumptions.
Chapter Four: Choice Theory: Because They Want To.
Crime Chapter 13. Purpose In this chapter we explore one of the problems associated with urban areas, crime. We introduce three tools that allow us to.
Neoclassical Criminology
CJS - Chapter 6 What does Walker mean by --- "deterrence has a simple, intuitive appeal"? Punishment “should” work – “common sense” Key problem: Theory.
Chapter 4 Choice Theory.
Chapter Four The Development of Rational Choice Theory
Choice Theory Development of Choice Theory Concepts of Rational Choice
Rational Choice Theory and Deterrence Theory
The Rational Offender The “Classical School” Deterrence Theory
Classical theory n Beccaria: On crime and Punishment (1764) n Justice was chaotic, corrupt; governments were monarchies (divine right of kings) n Essay.
 Economics (language, theory)  “Expected Utility” = calculation of all risks and rewards  This is much broader than deterrence ▪ Includes risks not.
Theory 101 Organizing Theory Theoretical Traditions
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Theories of Delinquency. What to look for in a theory What are the central concepts (causes) Is the theory empirically supported? –Survey research, experimental.
Punishment & Sentencing Amy Getsch Crime and Justice.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
The Rational Offender The “Classical School” Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory.
Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories
Rational Choice, Routine Activities, and Deterrence.
“Rational Choice” and Opportunity Theories. “Rational Choice Theory” Economics (language, theory) –“Expected Utility” = calculation of all risks and rewards.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
1 Conflict & Marxist Theory Prediction: Those who lack power will get treated more harshly by the CJS In U.S., power = race/class Controlling for “legal.
SPECIFIC DETERRENCE Individuals who are caught and sanctioned by the criminal justice system will be less likely to re-offend ◦Does prison reduce recidivism?
Classical Criminology  Based on the assumption that individuals choose to commit crimes after weighing the consequences of their actions.  Grew out of.
“Rational Choice” Theories and Situational Crime Prevention
URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to The Urban Institute, its trustees, or.
Copyright © 2012, 2009, 2006, 2001, 1997 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved 0 Criminology: A Sociological.
©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter CJ 240: Legal Issues in Corrections.
Dealing with Lawbreakers
© 2003 Wadsworth Publishing Co. Chapter 5 The Development of Rational Choice Theory Criminology 8 th edition Larry J. Siegel.
The Criminal Justice System. Approaches to Crime Control Deterrence: the threat of punishment does deter crime if the individual knows: ▫They are likely.
Deviance and the Criminal Justice System 1.Illegitimate Opportunity Structures and perceptions of crime in our society 2.The Criminal Justice System 3.The.
Chapter Four: Choice Theory: Because They Want To.
Unit 4 Dr. Marie Mele. Topics to Discuss Ability of people to make rational choices How people weigh the risks and rewards of engaging in crime How the.
Important Piece of Research I Forgot to Cover Larry Sherman’s Domestic Violence Experiments  Random assignment of police response to D.V. Counsel Separate.
Crime and Punishment By: Emily, Scott, Zander and Brendan.
Week Four The Development of Rational Choice Theory.
Application of Criminological Theory to Terrorism Prevention Detective Eric Paull Planning Research and Development Akron, OH Police Department.
Reward and Punishment.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Class Name, Instructor Name
Deterrence Theory Professor James Byrne, Fall September, 2015
Contemporary Research & Theory
The Development of Rational Choice Theory
C H A P T E R T H R E.
Choice Theory Chapter 4 SOC 112.
Chapter 2 Causes of Crime
Chapter 1 – Introduction: The Goals of Punishment
Goals of Punishment.
Rational Choice Theory
Sutherland & Cressy (1960) Criminology is the scientific approach to:
Chapter Four Rational Choice Theory
C10: Punishment and Sentencing
Part F-I The Economic Theory of Crime and Punishment
Sentencing and Punishment
6. Deviance, Crime, and Social Control
Rational Choice Theory
Theories of Delinquency
Introduction to Theory
Chapter 3 Neoclassical Criminology
Goodbye to the “Hedonistic Calculators” and Hello to “Born Criminals”
Environmental Criminology
Chapter 7 Section 5: Crime and Punishment
The Impact of incarceration on the risk of violent recidivism
Presentation transcript:

“Choice Theories” Historical Context of Choice Theories Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activity Theory

The Classical School of Criminology The Age of Enlightenment (1750-1850) Beccaria: Rational Punishment System Hedonistic Calculus, path of least resistance Possible to control behavior through formal punishment Bentham: Utilitarian System Goals = prevent or reduce seriousness of criminal offenses as cheaply as possible

REBIRTH in the 70’s and 80”s Martinson Report and the “nothing works” attack on rehabilitation Thinking About Crime by James Q. Wilson attacks view that crime is a function of external forces Wilson proposes a forceful reaction to crime, otherwise, those sitting on the fence will get the idea that “crime pays”

Deterrence Theory ASSUMPTIONS Hedonistic Calculus Punishment Can Control Behavior All Individuals Recognize Opportunity and Evaluate Risk and Reward Equally Fear of formal punishment is the only restraint for crime

General Deterrence As the severity, certainty, and swiftness of formal (state sanctioned) punishment increases, criminal behavior decreases. Absolute vs. Marginal Effects

Objective Measures of Severity Death Penalty Average Sentence Length Average “Time Served” Evidence? Very Weak if Any

Objective Measures of Certainty Arrest rates (clearance rates) Possible “tipping effect” for large metropolitan areas (SMSA’s) if clearance rates exceed 30% Percent of Arrests Resulting in Convictions

Manipulation of Certainty The Kansas Preventative Patrol Experiment Sameul Walker’s “mayonnaise” theory of police patrolling. But, “saturation patrols” may be effective Police “crackdowns” Short term effects, displacement.

Perceptual Measures of General Deterrence Ask people: What are the odds that you would get apprehended if you did __________ How severely would you be punished if you did _________ Those who think the odds of apprehension are high and the penalties are severe should be less criminal (Largely an “EXPERIENTIAL” Effect).

SPECIFIC DETERRENCE Individuals who are caught and sanctioned by the criminal justice system will be less likely to re-offend Does prison reduce recidivism? Do “deterrence based” programs reduce recidivism? BOOT CAMPS INTENSIVE PROBATION

Minneapolis domestic violence study (Larry Sherman) Randomly assign d.v. strategies to police officers Arrest, Counsel, or Separate for 8 hours Findings: Arrest = 10% re-arrested after 3 months Counseling = 19% Separate = 24%

Why is the deterrence evidence so weak? Based on “weak” theory—weak assumptions Limits of deterrence in a democratic society MARGINAL vs. ABSOLUTE

Informal Sanctions Fear of Informal Sanctions is not “Deterrence theory.” However, formal sanctions may “kick in” informal sanctions.

John Braithwaite Crime, Shame and Reintegration Shame that stigmatizes Shame that reintegrates

“Rational Choice Theory” Other side of the “deterrence coin” Same assumptions, same logic Difference = focus on offender’s mindset/reasoning rather than specifically on formal punishment Key Question? How rational is the decision to commit crime?

Rationality “Pure rational” model “Limited rational model” Crime is committed only when the expected utility outweighs the risk. “Limited rational model” What “structures” or “limits” rationality? Temperament, peer group, moral beliefs… Problem = no longer “rational choice”

Criminal Event versus Criminal Involvement Criminal Event (offense specific) When selecting targets or planning crimes, how rational are offenders? Criminal Involvement (offender specific) Do criminals weigh the costs and benefits in choosing “crime” versus “non-crime?”

The Criminal Event Some evidence of rational calculation choosing place of crime choosing specific targets methods to avoid apprehension BUT: Also evidence of non-rational “calculations.” Overestimate the benefits (the “big score”) Underestimate (or don’t consider) risk

Criminal Involvement Do people make a rational decision to start engaging in crime? Weigh costs and benefits of crime to “non-crime?” Most rational choice theories severely limit rationality in this respect They focus instead on things that constrain rationality

Policy Implications of RCT and Deterrence (Offender Specific) Rehabilitation, (unless painful) won’t work Raising the certainty, swiftness or severity of penalties will work If system cannot be swift, severe and certain, then reduce opportunities for offending incapacitation

Implications of a rational criminal event (Offense Specific) model Apply “Routine Activity Theory” Situational Crime Prevention Target hardening The “club” Unbreakable glass in stores City planning (construction) Lighting Avoid schools near shopping areas