Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages (August 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deborah L. Berry, Eric H. Baehrecke  Cell 
Advertisements

The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Brian S. Robinson, Juang Huang, Yang Hong, Kenneth H. Moberg 
Ras Activity in the Drosophila Prothoracic Gland Regulates Body Size and Developmental Rate via Ecdysone Release  Philip E. Caldwell, Magdalena Walkiewicz,
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Drosophila development: Scalloped and Vestigial take wing
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
MicroRNA Pathways Modulate Polyglutamine-Induced Neurodegeneration
Tatsushi Igaki, Raymond A. Pagliarini, Tian Xu  Current Biology 
Jung Hwan Kim, Xin Wang, Rosemary Coolon, Bing Ye  Neuron 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Hippo Reprograms the Transcriptional Response to Ras Signaling
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Qiong Wang, Mirka Uhlirova, Dirk Bohmann  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (April 2006)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
RNA Interference: Systemic RNAi SIDes with Endosomes
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
The Drosophila Tumor Suppressor vps25 Prevents Nonautonomous Overproliferation by Regulating Notch Trafficking  Thomas Vaccari, David Bilder  Developmental.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Marisa M. Merino, Christa Rhiner, Marta Portela, Eduardo Moreno 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
The C. elegans Glycopeptide Hormone Receptor Ortholog, FSHR-1, Regulates Germline Differentiation and Survival  Saeyoull Cho, Katherine W. Rogers, David S.
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
Cell Competition Drives the Formation of Metastatic Tumors in a Drosophila Model of Epithelial Tumor Formation  Teresa Eichenlaub, Stephen M. Cohen, Héctor.
Yoshinori Tomoyasu, Yasuyuki Arakane, Karl J. Kramer, Robin E. Denell 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 14, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (May 2001)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Thomas J. Klein, Andreas Jenny, Alexandre Djiane, Marek Mlodzik 
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Tumor Suppressor CYLD Regulates JNK-Induced Cell Death in Drosophila
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Joseph M. Bateman, Helen McNeill  Cell 
Control of a Kinesin-Cargo Linkage Mechanism by JNK Pathway Kinases
Mask Proteins Are Cofactors of Yorkie/YAP in the Hippo Pathway
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (June 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages 1378-1382 (August 2010) Rabex-5 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity Restricts Ras Signaling to Establish Pathway Homeostasis in Drosophila  Hua Yan, Maryam Jahanshahi, Elizabeth A. Horvath, Hsiu-Yu Liu, Cathie M. Pfleger  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages 1378-1382 (August 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Loss of Rabex-5 Causes Increased Size, Ectopic Wing Veins, and Eye/Antennal Phenotypes (A and B) FRT80B control, left. Homozygous Rabex-5 deletion (ex42/ex42) resulted in giant larvae (A, right) and pupae (B, right), often containing melanotic masses (arrows, A). (C) Constitutive Rabex-5 RNA interference (RNAi) (Act>Rabex-5IR, right) increased adult size compared to Actgal4/+ controls (left, males shown). (D) Table of Act>Rabex-5IR phenotypes. Length, weight, and wing area are normalized to 1.000 for controls and are shown as a ratio to controls ± standard deviation; numbers of samples are in parentheses. (E) Overlay of Act>Rabex-5IR (red) and control Actgal4/+ (blue) wings. (F) Control Actgal4/+ wing. (G) Act>Rabex-5IR wings contain extra posterior crossveins (PCV, bottom arrow) and extra longitudinal veins (LV, top arrow). (H) Control c765gal4/+ wing. (I and J) Rabex-5 RNAi in the wing at 30°C using c765gal4 caused extra veins (arrows, I) and was enhanced by deletion allele Rabex-5ex42 (J). (K) Table of wing phenotypes. Wings with ectopic veins over total wings are shown in parentheses. (L) Control ey>dcr2 eye. (M–O) Strong Rabex-5 RNAi in the early eye (ey>dcr2, Rabex-5IR) produced overgrown eyes (M), small eyes (N), extra antennae (O, overhead view of N) and other abnormalities (Figure S1). (P) Table of eye results. For tables in (D), (K), and (P), ∗p < 0.05 compared to control; †p < 0.05 for suppression by Ras alleles. Images and quantitation shown in (D)–(O) are from females; quantitation in (P) is of males. (Q) Western blot of larvae homozygous for control FRT80B or Rabex-5ex42. dpERK (top) and total ERK (bottom) staining showed 3.9-fold ± 0.23 (standard deviation) increased ERK activation in mutant larvae compared to controls. Additional controls are shown in Figure S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1378-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of Rabex-5 Enhances Activated Egfr and Oncogenic Ras (A–C) Activated Egfr, EgfrA887T (left, A), or RasV12S35 (left, B) expressed in differentiating eye cells caused small, rough eyes. (A and B) Rabex-5 RNAi (right) enhanced GMR>EgfrA887T (A) and GMR>RasV12S35 (B), as evidenced by the appearance of black tissue (arrows; enlarged in insets) and lethality (Figure S2). (C) Table quantifying effects of Rabex-5 loss on EgfrA887T, RasV12S35, and Rafgof. Female eyes are shown and quantified. In Rafgof eyes, Rabex-5 reduction did not statistically significantly change the frequency of black tissue compared to control (p > 0.05). (D–G) ELAV (green) stains presumptive photoreceptors; Distal-less (red) stains presumptive antennae in larval discs. (D) eygal4/+ control. (E) ey>Rabex-5IR control. (F) Larval disc expressing RasV12S35 in the early eye. (G) RasV12S35 discs with reduced Rabex-5 showed increased overgrowth, extra antennae (arrowheads), and ectopic eyes (arrow). Scale bar represents 200 μm. (H) Graph quantifying phenotypes in (D) and (E). For table in (C) and graph in (H), ∗p < 0.05 compared to control. Additional controls and quantitation are shown in Figure S2. Current Biology 2010 20, 1378-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rabex-5 Regulates Wing Vein Specification via Its Ubiquitin Ligase Domain (A) Control engal4/+ wing. (B and C) Expressing Rabex-5WT (B) or Rabex-5DPYT (C) using engal4 resulted in crossvein loss (arrows). (D) Expressing Rabex-5FY did not alter wing vein pattern. Female wings are shown. (E) Table of results from (A)–(D). ∗p < 0.05 for transgenes compared to control. (F–H) Wing clones expressing Rabex-5DPYT (green) show loss of dpERK staining (red in G and H, arrows in G). (H) Merge of (F) and (G). Scale bar represents 50 μm. Additional controls are shown in Figure S3. Current Biology 2010 20, 1378-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rabex-5 Ubiquitin Ligase Domain Suppresses Oncogenic Ras (A–C) Coexpressing Rabex-5WT (A, RasV12S35+Rabex-5WT, right) or Rabex-5DPYT (B, RasV12S35+Rabex-5DPYT, right) in differentiating eye cells suppressed RasV12S35 (left in A–C). (C) Coexpressing Rabex-5FY (RasV12S35+Rabex-5FY, right) did not suppress RasV12S35. (D) Summary table. Eye size was normalized to 1.000 for GMRgal4/+ controls and is shown as a ratio to controls ± standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05 for Rabex-5 and/or RasV12S35 transgene expression compared to GMRgal4/+ control; †p < 0.05 for suppression of GMR>RasV12S35. (E) Nickel pull-down of lysates from cells expressing tagged Ras, Ub, and Rabex-5. Rabex-5 expression increased Ras ubiquitination (right lane). Anti-HA (top) and anti-FLAG (bottom) staining are shown. Diubiquitinated Ras is indicated by arrows; unconjugated Ras is indicated by an arrowhead. Additional controls are shown in Figure S4. Current Biology 2010 20, 1378-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions