Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang*

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Field measurements of QEA magnets at KEK Mika Masuzawa May 30, 2006.
Advertisements

HL-LHC Corrector Magnet 3D design status Giovanni Volpini on behalf of the LASA team CERN, February 25, 2014.
A.KOVALENKO SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS for NICA BOOSTER & COLLIDER NICA ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION - 3 JINR, Dubna, November 05, 2008.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Magnet designs for the ESRF-SR2
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Magnets for Mu2e Resonant Extraction: Design and Scope Changes V.Nagaslaev 05/09/2013.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
F James T Volk June Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
Design of DC septum magnets based on measurements and 3D calculation of an R&D septum magnet for Rapid Cycle Synchrotron of J-PARC Masao Watanabe, Accelerator.
A Presentation On Construction Of Turbo Generator
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
F James T Volk Arpil Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
Design of wide aperture/thin septa of extraction system for J-PARC-50GeV ring 1. The outline of septa system for 50GeVring 2. Designing of thin septa and.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Linac4 MAC 29 th January 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 Magnets for Linac4 Th. Zickler CERN Linac4 Machine Advisory Committee 28 th - 30 th January.
Practical aspects of small aperture quadrupoles Dr Ben Leigh Tesla Engineering Ltd.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
L-8 MAGNETIC CIRCUITS ELE 1001: Basic Electrical Technology
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
Iron-free high current pulsed air-core coil quadrupoles
Physics Design of CBETA Quadrupoles
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Preliminary Design of High Precision Small Aperture Magnets for BAPS
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Technical Feasibility of Anti-DID Coil
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
DOE/SC Status Review of 12 GeV SHMS HB Magnet: Update since Oct 2015
Progress of SPPC lattice design
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
III. Correction Dipoles MDG Accessories for all Magnets V. Summary
High Precision Magnet Production for NSLSII at IHEP
INTRODUCTION OF ELECTRICAL MACHINES
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang* CEPC Magnet System Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang* IHEP, CAS Workshop on the Circular Electron-Positron Collider - EU edition Thursday 24 May 2018 - Saturday 26 May 2018

Outline CEPC collider magnet(F. Chen, M. Yang, X. Sun) Overview Design of the dual aperture dipole Design of the dual aperture quadrupole Design of the sextupole CEPC booster magnet(W. Kang) Design considerations of Low field dipole magnet Low field dipole magnet R&D Summary

Collider magnet overview The magnets cover almost 80% of the 100km ring. * Beam center separation:350 mm The most concern issues for collider magnet Manufacturing cost Power consumption Radiation shielding Field quality Dipole Quad. Sext. Corrector Total Dual aperture 2384 2392 - 13742 Single aperture 80*2+2 480*2+172 932*2 2904*2 Total length [km] 71.5 5.9 1.0 2.5 80.8 Power [MW] 7.0 20.2 4.6 2.2 34

Basic design consideration To reduce the manufacturing cost Make coil with aluminum instead of copper. Decrease the filling factor of core to reduce the steel. E.g. steel-concrete combined core referring to LEP. To reduce the power consumption Choose the gap/aperture as small as possible. Use dual aperture dipole and dual aperture quadrupole. Dual aperture magnet save about 50% power. Use dipole/sextupole combined function magnet. Reduce the sextupole strength. Increase the cross section of the magnet coils. High-voltage low-current design to reduce the cable loss. Possibility of using permanent magnet.

Design of dual aperture dipole The magnetic length of the dipole is 28.7m. The core is divided into 5 segments for easy fabrication. Different polarity sextupoles combined in the first and the last segments of one dipole To reduce the difficulty and power consumption of individual sextupoles No additional power supply is needed. SF SD

Design of dual aperture dipole Two types dual aperture dipole segments The first and the last segments: sextupole combined The three middle segments: dipole only Main coils: 1 turn  2 turns to reduce the power consumption of cables. Trim coils: For strength tapering ±1.5% adjustability Radiation shielding: 30mm thickness

Design of dual aperture dipole. Design parameters Magnetic length [m] 28.686 Magntetic strength [T] 0.037 Aperture [mm] 70 Main coil Turns 2 Material Aluminum Conductor specs. [mm] 30×54 Current [A] 1058 Current density [A/mm2] 0.67 Voltage [V] 2.58 Power consumption [kW] 2.73 Trim coil 1×4 60×3 16.7 0.093 0.36 0.006 Cooling water loop number 1 pressure [kg/cm2] 6 Velocity [m/s] 1.75 Flux [l/s] 0.138 Temperature rise [°C] 4.7 Overall size (H×V×L) [mm] 530×200×30500

Design of dual aperture quad. Polarity: F/D Main coils: large cross section to reduce power consumption Trim coils: ±1.5% adjustability Gap between cores: 50mm Magnetic shielding: 11.52mm Radiation shielding: 30mm

Design of dual aperture quad. Purpose of the magnetic shielding Compensate the odd order harmonics. The variation is proportional to the shielding thickness. All odd order harmonics can be compensated by tuning the shielding thickness. Bn/B2 Before shielding After shielding 1 -2132.6 -1.3 3 -169.9 -0.1 4 0.4 0.5 5 -2.3 0.0 6 7 0.2 10 14

Design of dual aperture quad. Design parameters Magnetic length [m] 2 Gradient [T/m] 8.42 Aperture [mm] 76 Main coil Turns 64×2 Material Aluminum Conductor specs. [mm] 11×11, φ7, R1 Current [A] 154 Current density [A/mm2] 1.89 Voltage [V] 34.1 Power consumption [kW] 5.3 Trim coil 20×4 copper 4×2, R0.2 7.2 0.9 5.4 0.04 Cooling water loop number 4 pressure [kg/cm2] 6 Velocity [m/s] 1.3 Flux [l/s] 0.201 Temperature rise [°C] 6.3 Overall size (H×V×L) [mm] 700×600×2000

Design of sextupole The sextupoles of the two rings are single aperture magnets installed side by side. The core size is limited by the 350mm beam separation. The space between two sextupoles is only 10mm. Copper coils to reduce the power consumption. Wedge shaped pole Powered with independent ps. No trim coil Radiation shielding 20mm

Design of sextupole Design parameters With the help of the combined function dipoles, the gradient can be halved to 253T/m2 and the power consumption is reduced to a quarter. Type SF SD Magnetic length [m] 0.7 1.4 Gradient [T/m2] 506* Aperture [mm] 80 Coil Turns 26×6 Material Copper Conductor specs. [mm] 7×7, φ3, R1 7×7, φ4, R1 Current [A] 168.4 Current density [A/mm2] 4.1 4.7 Voltage [V] 19.5 41.4 Power consumption [kW] 3.3 7.0 Cooling water loop number 12 pressure [kg/cm2] 6 Velocity [m/s] 2.1 1.8 Flux [l/s] 0.175 0.269 Temperature rise [°C] 4.5 6.2 Overall size (H×V×L) [mm] 350×350×700 350×350×1400

Outline CEPC booster magnet(W. Kang) CEPC collider magnet(F. Chen, M. Yang, X. Sun) Overview Design of the dual aperture dipole Design of the dual aperture quadrupole Design of the sextupole CEPC booster magnet(W. Kang) Design considerations Low field dipole magnet R&D

Main parameters of the CEPCB magnets Basic parameters of the three kinds of magnets

Low field dipole magnet Main parameters of low dipole magnet Challenges and design considerations Remnant field and coercive force Earth field effect Large quantities--------cost saving Field measurement :NMR and wire system Quantity 13312 Max. strength(T) 0.0614 Min. strength(T) 0.0031 Repetitive frequency(Hz) 0.1 Gap height(mm) 40 Good field region(mm) 52 Field uniformity 5e-4

Design considerations Earth field effect 0.3~0.5Gs. Unavoidable: covers 1%-2% of the min. working field. A H type of yoke is chosen. Closed structure has a better shielding against the earth field.

Design considerations Remnant field and coercive force. 4~6 Gs at the center of the magnet gap. Repeatability at different excitations. Solutions: Find low remnant field and coercive force material. Increase the field in the iron--Dilution. Remove the core-hollow coil scheme.

Design considerations Weight and Cost saving Less iron and cheaper material Dilution at both directions Aluminum coil instead of Copper Simple structure-one turn coil Iron laminations not machining. Field simulation and Prototype magnet study. The existing BH curve has no points at very low field. New BH data should be tested. The calculated field uniformity at 29 Gs and 300 Gs are the same but have large differences when measured.

CEPCB first prototype magnet Two refereces: LEP & LHeC LEP Packing factor=0.27 LHeC Packing factor=0.333

CEPCB first prototype magnet Core dilution in two directions The return yoke of the core was made as thin as possible. In the pole areas of the laminations, some holes were stamped. Iron to aluminum ratio is 1:2. Coil: Aluminium bus bar; One turn per pole.

CEPCB first prototype magnet Measurement results by Hall probe system. The measured remnant field in the magnet gap is about 4-6 Gs, which is 13%-20% of the low field of 30Gs. Due to remnant field, the field errors at low field becomes 10 times larger than that at high field Because of the remnant field effect and bad measurement precision of the Hall probe system at 30Gs, the field reproducibility at low field becomes 40 times worse than that at high field.

New design of CEPCB low field dipole Dipole with the core(new design) In order to improve the field quality at low field level, the dipole magnet with core is re-designed according to the new requirements of the CDR. Core dilution is still used. Silicon steel and aluminium laminations with a ratio of 1:1. The return yoke of the cores will be made as thin as possible. In the pole areas of the laminations, some holes will be stamped.

New design of CEPCB low field dipole To compensate errors of the simulation modelization, the simulated field uniformity at the high field level is optimized to be 10 times smaller than the requirements. It means that the measured field uniformity at low field level will probably meet the requirements even though it actually becomes 10 times worse than the simulated results. To reduce the influence of remnant field, the oriented low carbon silicon steel laminations with lower coercive force instead of non-oriented laminations will be used to stack the cores of the magnet.

New Design of CEPCB low field dipole Dipole without core Because the remnant field of the iron cores is the key element that destroys the field quality at low field level, a dipole magnet design without core is proposed. An optimized design of dipole magnet with cosθ type coils can meet the field quality at both high and low field levels. The iron cylinder outside of the coils is used to shield the surrounding field as well as to increase the central field.

New design of CEPCB low field dipole The main disadvantage of the magnet without core is that the excitation efficiency is only 50% of that in the magnet with core. To improve the excitation efficiency of the magnet, the top and bottom of the cylinder can be flatted, the simulation result shows that it can increase the excitation efficiency by 5%. In addition, the flat top and bottom has a function to adjust the field distribution and improve field quality.

New design of CEPCB low field dipole The upper and lower coils of the magnet are formed by two aluminum bars with the same cross section areas, each coil has two layers and two turns. Because of the low field level and small magnetic force, for 1 m long magnet, three supporters at different positions in longitudinal direction are strong enough to fix the coil bars . To verify the design of the magnet without core, a subscale prototype dipole magnet will be developed.

Summary A twin aperture quadrupole prototype will be built to verify the design and mechanical structure. Further optimizations will be done according to the measurement results. A subscale prototype dipole magnet for CEPCB was developed, however the measured field errors and reproducibility at low field level became 10 times worse than that at high field level unexpectedly . New dipole magnet prototype with and without core will be constructed and studied.