Diverse Two-Dimensional Input Functions Control Bacterial Sugar Genes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HnRNP L and HnRNP A1 Induce Extended U1 snRNA Interactions with an Exon to Repress Spliceosome Assembly Ni-Ting Chiou, Ganesh Shankarling, Kristen W. Lynch.
Advertisements

Assigning Numbers to the Arrows Parameterizing a Gene Regulation Network by using Accurate Expression Kinetics.
Cost of Unneeded Proteins in E. coli Is Reduced after Several Generations in Exponential Growth Irit Shachrai, Alon Zaslaver, Uri Alon, Erez Dekel Molecular.
The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging Nuo Sun, Richard J. Youle, Toren Finkel Molecular Cell Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016) DOI: /j.molcel
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Stopping the Clock with MYC
Rewiring Cas9 to Target New PAM Sequences
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Deconstructing ERK Signaling in Tumorigenesis
Methed-Up FOXOs Can't In-Akt-ivate
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Wenlian Qiao, Peter W. Zandstra  Cell Stem Cell 
PHLPPing It off: Phosphatases Get in the Akt
Dynamic Response Diversity of NFAT Isoforms in Individual Living Cells
Coordinate Transcriptional Regulation by ERG and Androgen Receptor in Fusion- Positive Prostate Cancers  Yu Chen, Charles L. Sawyers  Cancer Cell  Volume.
How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem
P Bodies and the Control of mRNA Translation and Degradation
Jan Philipp Junker, Alexander van Oudenaarden  Molecular Cell 
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Wilma Ziebuhr, Jörg Vogel  Molecular Cell 
Karin Johanna Ferrari, Elisa Lavarone, Diego Pasini  Molecular Cell 
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Lea Goentoro, Oren Shoval, Marc W. Kirschner, Uri Alon  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Genomic Run-On Evaluates Transcription Rates for All Yeast Genes and Identifies Gene Regulatory Mechanisms  José Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Agustı́n Aranda, José.
Rewriting the Epigenome
Different aa-tRNAs Are Selected Uniformly on the Ribosome
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Gene Regulation: Stable Noise
Biomedical Language Processing: What's Beyond PubMed?
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Small Molecules, Big Effects: A Role for Chromatin-Localized Metabolite Biosynthesis in Gene Regulation  Bryan A. Gibson, W. Lee Kraus  Molecular Cell 
Gene Regulation: Hacking the Network on a Sugar High
New Insights into Genome Structure: Genes of a Feather Stick Together
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Boosting Signal-to-Noise in Complex Biology: Prior Knowledge Is Power
MicroRNAs in a Cardiac Loop: Progenitor or Myocyte?
Nuclear Decay Factors Crack Up mRNA
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Transferring Death: A Role for tRNA in Apoptosis Regulation
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (January 2013)
Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Gene Regulation
Mode of Regulation and the Insulation of Bacterial Gene Expression
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Forging New Ties between E. coli Genes
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Arjun Raj, Alexander van Oudenaarden  Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (November 2000)
A FIRE-y PAGE in the Computational Analysis of Cancer Profiles
Enhancer Malfunction in Cancer
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Sequence of Steps in Ribosome Recycling as Defined by Kinetic Analysis
Probing the Limits to Positional Information
How To Choose a Good Scientific Problem
It Takes Two Binding Sites for Calcineurin and NFAT to Tango
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
53BP1 Goes Back to Its p53 Roots
Presentation transcript:

Diverse Two-Dimensional Input Functions Control Bacterial Sugar Genes Shai Kaplan, Anat Bren, Alon Zaslaver, Erez Dekel, Uri Alon  Molecular Cell  Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 786-792 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.021 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Regulatory Circuitry of E. coli Sugar Genes Is in the Form of a DOR Network Motif Each gene is regulated by CRP and a system-specific transcription factor. Inducing sugars for each system are shown. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 786-792DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.021) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Input Functions of E. coli Sugar Genes (A–E) Arabinose system. (F–I) Galactose system. (J–M) Maltose system. (N–P) Rhamnose system. (Q–S) Fucose system. Input functions are defined as the promoter activity at each of the 96 combinations of the two input signals, cAMP and the sugar. The x- and y-axes correspond respectively to external sugar and cAMP concentrations in mM. The same cAMP levels are used in all input functions, and the same sugar levels are used in each column. Promoter activity is the rate of GFP fluorescence accumulation per OD unit in exponential phase. The figure shows promoter activity normalized to its maximal value for each promoter. Rows are arranged by biological role. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 786-792DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.021) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Separation of Variables in Gene Input Functions Input functions are well described by the product of the responses to each input separately. (A) araJ input function (arabinose system). (B) malK input function (maltose system). (C) galP input function (galactose system). The functions h1 and h2 correspond to the response to sugar and cAMP, respectively, holding the other input at saturating levels. Hill curves (full lines) are best fits to data (x). In the case of galP, fits are to a Hill function with a basal level h1(x) = b + (a(x/K)n) / (1 + (x/K)n), and to the nonmonotonic function h2 = (b + (x/K)n) / (1 + (x/K)n + (x/K′)2n) (see the Experimental Procedures). Also shown are the experimentally measured input functions. All functions are normalized to their maximum value. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 786-792DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.021) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Gene Systems and Effective Parameters of Their Input Functions K1 and n1 correspond to the best-fit Hill functions for the sugar input, and K2 and n2 correspond to the best-fit Hill functions for cAMP. Maximal intensity is the maximal promoter activity measured for that system. In these units, background noise is about 2 units. Fit error is the rms difference between the best-fit separation-of-variables function to the measured input function, both normalized by their maximal value. Known binding sites in each promoter are shown (Keseler et al., 2005): CRP site (filled diamond) and sugar-specific regulator site (empty square). Asterisk (∗), nonmonotonic input functions. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 786-792DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.021) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions