Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.
Advertisements

 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Budgets, Dialog and Sustainability Chris Hill, Grossmont College Virginia May, Sacramento City College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Policies, Processes, and Practices, Oh My!
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Committee Orientation
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Leadership and Governance: Understanding Standard IV
Randy Beach, south representative CraiG Rutan, Area D representative
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Surviving an Accreditation Visit and other accreditation hot topics
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
All About Resources: Standard III
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Policies, Processes, and Practices
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I WITH GUIDANCE ON I.B.3 AND I.B.6 Stephanie Droker, Vice.
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Accreditation and curriculum
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”
ISER Committee Presentations
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
ACCREDITATION 101 Sam Foster, ASCCC Area D Representative
Keeping Your Senate Engaged Under a Barrage of Initiatives
Accreditation in multi-college districts
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
AIQ Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/25/2018
February 21-22, 2018.
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College Craig Rutan, ASCCC Accreditation Chair

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA What Brings You Here? Are you a faculty member? Administrator? Researcher? Are you experienced with accreditation? New to accreditation Some previous experience with accreditation An accreditation expert What are you hoping to get out of this session? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Standard I: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Mission Assuring Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Academic Quality Institutional Effectiveness Institutional Integrity 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Standard I.A: Mission Ensure that all college programs and services align with the mission Mission must contain: broad educational purpose, intended student population, types of degrees and certificated offered (need to address if in the bachelors degree pilot) and a commitment to student learning and achievement Mission must be linked to: Decision Making, Planning, and Resource Allocation Achievement of the mission must be qualitatively and quantitatively shown through data and data analysis 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Effective Practices: I.A Review your mission systematically, not just the year before a visit. Reference you mission in all your planning documents Use the mission as a guiding force for resource allocation Publish the mission far and wide on campus in documents to the public Require each program to write how they address the mission through the program review process Identify specific data that can show college is meeting its mission 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Standard I.B: Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Focus on Data and Dialog Types of Data: Student Learning Outcomes Student Equity Data Achievement Data Intuitional Set Standards Disaggregated Data Dialog: Identify Performance Gaps Implement Improvement Plans 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Standard I.B.3 The institution establishes institution-set standards for student achievement, appropriate to its mission, assesses how well it is achieving them in pursuit of continuous improvement, and publishes this information. Set a standard monitor and challenge the effectiveness of the institution Setting standards should involve broad dialog across the institution Standards should be evaluated every year 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Standard I.B.6 The institution disaggregates and analyzes learning outcomes and achievement for subpopulations of students. When the institution identifies performance gaps, it implements strategies, which may include allocation or reallocation of human, fiscal and other resources, to mitigate those gaps and evaluates the efficacy of those strategies. There is no one size, fits all model for disaggregation. Colleges must determine the best subpopulations for them. More discussion about 1.B.6 in New Challenges with Student Learning Outcomes? Breakout at 4 PM! 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Effective Practices: 1.B Identify processes and procedures for collecting and analyzing and using outcome data for student learning and achievement Collect disaggregated data on achievement of student learning outcomes and use that data in discussions of student equity Create and assess intuitional set standards Identify short and long-range needs based on data 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Standard I.C: Institutional Integrity Providing Clear and Accurate information to faculty, staff, students and the public. Resources should be published online: College Catalog Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Results Correspondence with the Commission Catalog should describe certificates, degrees and programs in terms of purpose, content, course requirements, and expected learning outcomes. The college must regularly review its policies, procedures, and publications Academic Freedom and Academic honesty/dishonesty 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Effective Practices: I.C Confirm all information in institutional documents and publications are clear and accurate Make sure that the college/district has an academic freedom statement, a policy on academic integrity (including academic honesty/dishonesty) Provide evidence that policies and procedures are followed. 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Eligibility Requirements Linked to Standard I 6 (Mission) 11 (Student Learning and Achievement) 13 (Academic Freedom) 19 (Institutional Planning and Evaluation) 20 ( Integrity in Communication with the Public) 21 ( Integrity in Relations with the Accrediting Commission) 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

Faculty Involvement in Standard I Faculty (Academic Senates) should be involved through: Assessment of the current mission and revisions Making sure that the mission is part of the program review process Producing, Collecting and Reviewing Student learning outcomes Identify strategies for improvement based on data and dialog Creating and discussion of Institutional Set Standards Reviewing the colleges Academic Freedom Policy Crafting academic dishonesty policy (cheating and plagiarism) 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Being Prepared All faculty and staff need to understand how your college processes work. These processes include College Yearly Planning Process Hiring of faculty, staff, and administrators Program Review SLO Assessment Cycles Review and Revision of the College Mission 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA Thank You for Coming Do you have additional questions? Vernon Martin (vmartin@sierracollege.edu) Craig Rutan (rutan_craig@sccollege.edu) 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute – Napa, CA