Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /0103r1 Submission Laurent Cariou January 19, 2010 Slide 1 Gains provided by multichannel transmissions Authors: Date:
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /1159r1 Submission Laurent Cariou Sept, 2010 Slide 1 Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0778r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR July MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Bandwidth signaling for EDMG
Regulatory Classes for 80 MHz Channel
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
CCA schemes for the 120MHz spectrum in China
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
January 2012 Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs Date: January 17th, 2012 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone.
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
Channel Selection and Management for 11ac
120MHz channelization solution
Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode
EXtreme Throughput (XT)
Evaluation of the saturation of the 5GHz band
Gains provided by multichannel transmissions
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Channel Selection and Management for 11ac
EXtreme Throughput (XT)
Evaluation of the saturation of the 5GHz band
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
VHT BSS Channel Selection
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
40 MHz Operation in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: November 2006
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
LB97 Coex: Duplicate DSSS
VHT - SG Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
120 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: January 2010
40 MHz Operation in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: November 2006
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
80MHz and 160MHz channel access modes
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
TGah Coexistence Assurance
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz
CCA schemes for the 120MHz spectrum in China
80MHz and 160MHz channel access modes
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz June r0
Presentation transcript:

Non contiguous 40+40 MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Non contiguous 40+40 MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global Date: 2010-11-11 John Doe, Some Company

Content The following modes have already been accepted by 11ac 20MHz, 40MHz, 80MHz (mandatory) Contiguous and non contiguous 160MHz (optional) Optional 40+40MHz non contiguous transmission mode should be added to the spec framework especially for Europe, Japan and Global operating class tables it enables to exploit the part of the band left aside by the current contiguous 80MHz frequency planning it increases the probability to transmit at 80MHz (the target of 11ac) in presence of neighboring BSS or radars its complexity is identical to the 80+80MHz mode already accepted by TGac

80MHz Channel planning in 5GHz band Weather radars 5170 MHz 5330 MHz 5490 MHz 5710 MHz 5735 MHz 5835 MHz 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 100 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140 149 153 157 161 165 IEEE channel # 20 MHz 40 MHz 80 MHz only in US Only 4 channels for 80MHz in Europe/Japan/Global, only 2 at 30dBm If a weather radar is active, one channel (in red) is denied, reducing the number of available channels to 3 In many cases, contiguous only BSS will not be able to transmit at 80MHz without overlapping Non contiguous 40+40MHz mode is the solution in this part of the band each 40MHz segment is allocated in the band according to 40MHz channel planning Slide 3

Neighboring BSS issue Neighboring BSS is an issue in big cities of Europe/Japan/Global because the density of population is high (>3000 people per sqKm) Europe: Japan USA Source : www.citymayors.com Slide 4

Typical example of fragmented usage of 5GHz band in Europe/Japan Weather radars 5170 MHz 5330 MHz 5490 MHz 5710 MHz 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 100 104 108 112 116 120 124 128 132 136 140 IEEE channel # 20 MHz Load < 20% 40 MHz Load > 80% 80 MHz In red colour, the 20MHz channels (48, 60, 100, 116 and 136) with a high load (neighboring 802.11a and 802.11n APs) If a new 802.11ac AP is looking for 80MHz bandwidth … Contiguous 80MHz transmission is disrupted due to high loaded channels (load > 80%) Contention with neighboring APs and channel access is deferred Non contiguous 40+40MHz transmission is assured thanks to low loaded channels (load < 10%) Four 40MHz non contiguous channels are available !!!

Extension of the existing non-contiguous mode Non contiguous 40+40MHz mode could be paired with in the non contiguous 80+80 MHz mode Chipsets with the non contiguous option could target 2 markets: Low density areas when using 80+80 MHz High density areas when using 40+40 MHz Non contiguous 40+40MHz mode provides a high throughput experience for end-user in dense areas instead of a fallback of 40MHz mode ("802.11n like" behavior) Focus for cities with high density of overlapping BSS In the case where MU-MIMO is not applicable Flexibility to choose (primary-secondary) and (tertiary-quaternary) channels The case where the two 40Mhz segments are adjacent is excluded Fallback to the 80Mhz contiguous mode

Conclusion 40+40MHz non contiguous transmission mode should be added to the spec framework as an optional feature for Europe/Japan/Global Areas with less channels and high density of population it enables to exploit the part of the band left aside by the current contiguous 80MHz frequency planning it increases the probability to transmit at 80MHz (the target of 11ac) in presence of neighbors or radars.. it does not imply any additional complexity for devices supporting the 80+80MHz mode already accepted by TGac

Pre-motion Do you support adding the following section and item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? Section 3.1.D Non contiguous 160 MHz PHY Transmission R3.1.D.1: The draft specification shall include support for non contiguous 40+40MHz PHY transmission, whose frequency spectrum consists of two segments, necessarily non-adjacent in frequency, each transmitted using one 40 MHz channel, for devices supporting non contiguous 160 MHz. Yes: No: Abstain:

References [1] Cariou, L. and Christin, P., Non contiguous 40+40 additional bandwidth mode, IEEE 802.11-10/1159r1, Sept 2010 [2] Cariou, L. and Christin, P., 80MHz and 160MHz channel access modes, IEEE 802.11-10/0385r1, Mar. 2010 [3] Cariou, L. and Benko, J., Gains provided by multichannel transmissions, IEEE 802.11-10/0103r1, Jan. 2010