V G 222nd Working Group C Plenary Meeting 20-21 March 2012 Groundwater bodies delineation in France Susanne Schomburgk, BRGM, Water Division s.schomburgk@brgm.fr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WFD Reporting - River Basin Management Plans 2016
Advertisements

Ground water flow modeling. Input data preparation. D.Frank-Kamenetsky (Committee) I.Bogotyrev (Mineral) G.Savenkova (Mineral) M.Naumovets (Mineral) G.Bogdanova.
| Slide 1 Establishing Threshold Values for Groundwater Johannes Grath Andreas Scheidleder 26 June 2007.
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
Groundwater quantitative status in Denmark Hans Jørgen Henriksen Climate change and adaptive water management in EU and beyond. Vingsted March 9, 2009.
Hydrogeology in the Limpopo Basin
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Horizontal Guidance on Water Bodies.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
| Folie 1 Groundwater Quality Monitoring in Austria Karin Weber Federal Environment Agency - Austria.
CHARACTERISATION OF TRANSBOUNDARY GROUNDWATERS IN CROATIA
Assessment of Transboundary Groundwaters in South Eastern Europe
Discussion Document for Scoping Phase
Climate Change & Environmental Risks Unit Research Directorate General
EEA 2017 State of European waters
French groundwater monitoring networks
Type of presentation/visualisation
GWB Visualisation – GIS
Climate change impact on coastal aquifers in France –vulnerability of coastal aquifers due to sea level rise Nathalie Dörfliger Head.
2nd Workshop on Groundwater Bodies
Dilemma of Boundaries in the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Finnish Experiences from the Public Consultations Juha-Markku Leppänen.
Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance
Visualisation of the RBMP information in WISE
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Integrated Risk Assessment and Management Dietmar MÜLLER Federal Environment Agency Austria.
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR THE WFD UK approach
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Report represents work in progress Makes recommendations for output
Discussion on compliance checking
Turloughs (1) Definition:
Water Framework Directive
Marine planning and the world according to the Environment Agency 23 November 2010 Lindsey Tucker, marine manager.
Nutrient Standards: Proposals for further work
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
at Umweltbundesamt GmbH Wien
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Germany
Working Group C Ariane BLUM, Hélène LEGRAND (France)
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
Groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
State of Water visualisation tool
Scheldt Pilot River Basin
WGC - GROUP 2 PROTECTED AREAS
Kestutis Kadunas & Juozas Mockevicius Geological Survey of Lithuania
Marine Reporting Units: Western Mediterranean Sea
WGC – Groundwater Meeting Quantitative Status Guidance 22 April 2008
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Implementation of the WFD on coastal and transitional waters in France
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Characterisation of groundwater bodies in the Scheldt pilot river basin district Ph. Meus* ICS-SCALDIT, P08 « Groundwater » * Ministère.
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Jurga Arustiene, Lithuanian Geological Survey
Drinking Water Protected Areas: Luxembourg Experiences
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
Available surface water resources million m3/a
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
EU Water Framework Directive
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Science Notes: Stnd 21 Date Learning Intention: 8.ESS3.1
Water Bodies Shannon Pilot River Basin
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

V G 222nd Working Group C Plenary Meeting 20-21 March 2012 Groundwater bodies delineation in France Susanne Schomburgk, BRGM, Water Division s.schomburgk@brgm.fr Sarah Bonneville , Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development, Transports and Housing Groundwater and water resource Unit sarah.bonneville@developpement-durable.gouv.fr

National Guidance document National Harmonisation Introduction Who’s doing what ? Coordinator : MEDDTL (French Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development, Transports and Housing ) Fulfilment : the 6 Water Agencies for the 9 mainland RBD Technical support : BRGM (French Geological Survey) National Guidance document “Circulaire” Delineation National Harmonisation Ministry/BRGM/ national expert group Water agencies BRGM

Groundwater body delineation Before the WFD: A national aquifer delineation/hydrogeology data base named “BDRHFv1” (“Base de Données du Référentiel Hydrogéologique Français” Based only on hydrogeological properties For the WFD: Construction of a new frame of reference Based on geological and hydrogeological criteria Very occasionally on pressures in order to have a stable map Exchanges between GWB are possible Deep groundwater bodies without any link with surface waters, in which no drinking water is (and will be) removed (salinity, temperature…) is not included in a GWB A GWB can present a spatial heterogeneity (qualitative and quantitative)

Groundwater body delineation 6 main types of lithology Mainly sedimentary (excluding alluvial) Alluvial Crystalline basement rocks Volcanic rocks “Intensively folded” (mountains areas) impervious “locally aquifer” + further criteria (e.g. karstic, coastal, confined/not confined …) The whole territory is covered by a GWB Limited number of GWB : ~ 500 Aquifers aggregation in order to avoid having “too many” entities “Reporting” unit and not “knowledge” unit Reasonable for the WFD reporting

Groundwater body delineation 574 GWB 533 in mainland France (15 trans-districts, 23 transboundaries) 38 in overseas territories Distribution of GWB types a very heterogeneous geology

Ranges of superposition for a GWB – French approach

Are we happy with this GWB delineation ? 10 years after the WFD, the GWB are well known and recognised by water managers, by the public, etc... But…. 10 ranges in France but at the EU level only 5 ranges seem to be wished Some limits don’t perfectly fit with the hydrogeological limits : better knowledge now than in 2004! new numerical géological mapping-system (scale :1/ 50 000) national database of boreholes with geological passes (under coverage), new local and regional hydrogeological studies Many GWB are too large and heterogeneous: difficulties to represent sub- parts « in poor status » Confined aquifers Transbondary aquifers

Delineation of confined aquifers 49 of 534 GWB in mainland France 1) At surface: according to coverage boundary, (much bigger surface if no boundary) 2) delineation under coverage of deep confines aquifer Remaining questions Depth? Lowest wells know in the aquifer? Knowledge of aquifer behaviour? Exemple : Chalkstone, very low permeability in > 50 m depth

Transboundary aquifers

Conclusion – next steps An updated GWB delineation will be available in 2012 for the river districts Loire- Brittany, Adour-Garonne and Rhône- Mediterranean /Corsica « Relatively » small changes to facilitate the next WFD reporting: Mainly adjustment of GWB boundaries following new knowledge (new hydrogeological reference system) Exemples of open questions in discussion between ministry, water agencies and BRGM(expert group): Management of depth for confined aquifers Complete coverage of the territory? Subdivision or creation of new GWB Consequences to manage Changes in the status assessment The GWB code of a borehole may change: need to link codes to the reporting period