45 Minutes Session 25 Practice: Test Interpretation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning English through Social Issues
Advertisements

Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices.
Critical Thinking Skills Academic Support Unit Adapted from: Practicing College Learning Strategies 3 rd edition Carolyn H. Hopper.
PSAE Practice Session Science Mr. Johns Room 2012.
The PhD Viva Steve Schneider 21 June This session Context on the nature of the PhD viva Two demonstration mini vivas Discussion and questions.
Orienting The Learner. Objectives Describe the characteristics of an effective learning environment Describe approaches to creating effective learning.
R U There? Looking for those Teaching Moments in Chat Transcripts Frances Devlin, John Stratton and Lea Currie University of Kansas ALA Annual Conference.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Strategies for Technical Communication in the Workplace
Funded by the Library of Congress.
In Pursuit of Happiness English 2P: Unit 3 ERWC Module.
POS406 Team Project Emilio Yanine. Team Assignment Your assignment is to analyze and understand the code of a sample program: 1. Be able to identify the.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
What is a DRE? Tony Corroto DRE/SFST Instructor DRE/SFST
Public Speaking Course Details. Public Speaking School Year, Spring Semester Monday – 10:00 to 11:45 AM Wednesday – 2:00 to 3:45 PM Room B205.
DRE 12 Step Process. The Drug Influence Evaluation Systematic and Standardized Process The DEC procedure is a systematic and standardized method of examining.
Identifying Assessments
Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)  12-Step Standardized and Systematic Process for evaluating persons suspected of being under the influence of drugs.  A.
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC. CCGA-P ARTE COURSE INTRODUCTION CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC Nov 2010.
Traffic Safety Lt.Garry Scott Vermont State Police Traffic Safety Unit.
The population in a statistical study is the entire group of individuals about which we want information The population is the group we want to study.
Banda Ramadan-Introduction1 Communication Skills (603281) Introduction to communication skills.
RES 320 expert Expect Success/res320expertdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Science Have your say! Student Consultation on the Background Paper for Science.
Review visit Heli Mattisen Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.
60 Minutes Session 2 Overview of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Procedures.
60 Minutes Session 2 Overview of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Procedures Revised: 01/2015 Drug Evaluation and Classification (Prelim) Drug Evaluation.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
90 Minutes Session 3 Psychophysical Tests.
Finalizing Award Recommendations
50 Minutes Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance.
Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance 50 Minutes
DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing
Session 26 Preparing the Narrative Report 50 Minutes
Session 30 Transition to the Certification Phase of Training
105 Minutes Session 12 Alcohol Workshop.
Drug Recognition Expert Course
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
1 Hour 30 Minutes Session 13 Report Writing Exercise and Moot Court.
2 Hours Session 14-A Video Workshop Second Session.
50 Minutes Session 26 Preparing the Narrative Report.
2 Hours Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session.
Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session 2 Hours R 2014
110 Minutes Session 24 Drug Combinations.
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
120 Minutes Session 5 Alcohol Workshop.
Session 14-A Dry Lab 2 Hours R 2014
Drug Evaluation and Classification (Prelim)
Presentation and Evaluation
105 Minutes Session 8 Demonstrations of the Evaluation Sequence.
90 Minutes Session 27 Practice: Test Administration.
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Session 16 Written Examination and Program Conclusion
Cooperative Learning Prepared By : English Language Supervisor
Understanding Types of Formal Reports
Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play) 120 Minutes
120 Minutes Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)
60 Minutes Session 11 Practice: Eye Examinations.
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Session 10 Conclusion of the Preliminary Training 45 Minutes
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
allen2e_01_02_li 1. Question: identification, location? A. B. C. D. E.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Detecting Drug Impaired Drivers
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
2 Hours Session 11 “Testing Subjects” Practice: First Session.
Presentation transcript:

45 Minutes Session 25 Practice: Test Interpretation

Learning Objectives Analyze the results of completed drug influence evaluations and identify the category or categories of drugs affecting the individual examined Describe the basis for the drug category identification Briefly review the objectives, content and activities of this session. Upon successfully completing this session the student will be able to: Analyze the results of completed drug influence evaluations and identify the category or categories of drugs affecting the individual examined. Describe the basis for the drug category identification.   CONTENT SEGMENTS LEARNING ACTIVITIES A. Interpretation Demonstrations Instructor Led Demonstrations Interpretation Practice Small Group Practice Participant Led Presentations

Case One: Subject Allen Preliminary Examination Eye Examinations Psychophysical Tests Vital Signs Examinations Interpretation Demonstrations Case One: Subject Allen Preliminary Examination Review the results of the Preliminary Examination of Subject Allen. Ask participants: “What category or categories of drugs would produce preliminary examination results consistent with this exemplar?” Probe to draw out the basis for participants’ responses. Eye Examinations Review the results of the Eye Examinations of Subject Allen. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would cause these eye examination results. Psychophysical Tests Review the results of the Psychophysical Tests of Subject Allen. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would produce these psychophysical results. Vital Signs Examinations Review the results of the Vital Signs Examinations of Subject Allen. produce these results.

Case One: Subject Allen (Cont.) Dark Room Examinations Other Evidence Opinions of the Evaluator Dark Room Examinations Review the results of the Dark Room Examinations of Subject Allen. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would produce these results. Other Evidence Review the results of the examinations for injection sites and muscle tone, and of the final interview of Subject Allen. Ask participants to comment on the category or categories of drugs that would be consistent with all of the evidence on this exemplar. Opinions of Evaluator Point out that the evidence indicates that Subject Allen is under the influence of Cannabis. Solicit participants’ questions concerning this demonstration.

Case Two: Subject Brown Preliminary Examination Eye Examinations Psychophysical Tests Vital Signs Examinations Case Two: Subject Brown Preliminary Examination Review the results of the Preliminary Examination of Subject Brown. Ask participants: “What category or categories of drugs would produce preliminary examination results consistent with this exemplar?” Probe to draw out the basis for participants’ responses. Eye Examinations Review the results of the Eye Examinations of Subject Brown. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would cause these eye examination results. Psychophysical Tests Review the results of the Psychophysical Tests of Subject Brown. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would produce these psychophysical results. Vital Signs Examinations Review the results of the Vital Signs Examinations of Subject Brown. produce these results.

Case Two: Subject Brown (Cont.) Dark Room Examinations Other Evidence Opinions of the Evaluator Dark Room Examinations Review the results of the Dark Room Examinations of Subject Brown. Ask participants to discuss the category or categories of drugs that would produce these results. Other Evidence Review the results of the examinations for injection sites and muscle tone, and of the final interview of Subject Brown. Ask participants to comment on the category or categories of drugs that would be consistent with all of the evidence on this exemplar. Opinions of Evaluator Point out that the evidence indicates that Subject Brown is under the influence of Cannabis. Solicit participants’ questions concerning this demonstration.

Interpretation Practice Team Practice Feedback of Results B. Interpretation Practice Team Practice Assign participants to work in teams of 3 or 4 members. Review and discussion of exemplars by teams. Tell teams that they are to review three exemplars (Subjects Cole, Davis, and Elliott). Team members are to discuss the evidence among themselves and reach a conclusion concerning the category or categories of drugs, if any. Teams will present their conclusions to the entire class. Allow teams approximately 15 minutes to review the three exemplars and reach their conclusions. Feedback of Results Poll the teams to determine their conclusions concerning the category or categories of drugs present in each subject. Subject Cole Subject Davis Subject Elliott Session Wrap-Up Offer appropriate comments concerning the teams’ performance.

QUESTIONS? Solicit participants’ comments and questions concerning this practice session.