July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0984r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth test cases with n 40 MHz Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1238r4 Submission November 2008 Peter Loc & KiranSlide 1 Proposal to Add Optional non n Radio Scans for 40 MHz Operation in.
Doc.: IEEE /1349r0 Submission November 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Dallas Liaison Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r3 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0127r0 Submission January 2009 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Bluetooth AFH and IEEE Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0576r3 Submission May 2009 George Vlantis (STMicroelectronics) et aliiSlide 1 TGn SB2: Presentation for 40MHz Coexistence CIDs Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0992r1 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0035r0 Submission November 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Robust Bluetooth Detection using n Energy Detector Notice:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0992r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola Inc.Slide 1 20/40 MHz 11n Interference on Bluetooth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r0 Submission September 2008 John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.Slide 1 Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0623r0 Submission May 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Resolutions to 20/40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Issues Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /1291r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Dynamic Bandwidth Control for aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal) KB Png.
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
LB97 20/40 BSS Coexistence Date: Authors: July 2007
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
LB97 CID Coex Date: Authors: May 2007 May 2007
November 2008 doc.: IEEE November 2008
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Additions
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
120MHz channelization solution
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution of CID 139] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Bluetooth SIG Liaison Report Nov08]
LB97 20/40 BSS Coexistence Date: Authors: July 2007
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
CR for CID 1105 Date: Authors: January 2019 Month Year
Proposed Resolutions to RFI comments of LB 166 on IEEE s D7.0
AP Power Down Notification
Greenfield VoIP Transmissions Cause False RADAR Triggers
Submission Title: [WG n Liaison Report, March09]
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Submission Title: [TGn Report Nov08] Date Submitted: [13Nov08]
Greenfield VoIP Transmissions Cause False RADAR Triggers
Proposal for TGac Selection Procedure
MAC Protocol to Support Dynamic Bandwidth for aj (60GHz)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
LB97 Coex: Duplicate DSSS
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
Interference Signalling Enhancements
August 2008 doc: IEEE c Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Responses.
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Comment resolution #79 Date: 2009, November 17 Authors: November 2009
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
MBCA and Beacon Timing element clean up
July 2008 doc.: IEEE /1021r0 November 2008
Additional 40 MHz Scanning Proposal
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2013
Proposed Resolution to CID 147 in CC12
Greenfield protection mechanism
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
Presentation transcript:

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Proposal to Add Optional non 802.11n Radio Scans for 40 MHz Operation in 2.4 GHz Authors: Date: 2008-10-21 Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Abstract From LB136 CID 10025 Comment July 2008 September 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1101r3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Abstract From LB136 CID 10025 Comment The recommendation for the HT-STA not to transmit any 40 MHz mask PPDUs if it has knowledge of non-802.11 devices operating in the area does nothing to ensure that 802.11n devices with such knowledge will not interfere with non-802.11n devices. In fact, it inadvertently creates a class of 802.11 devices that knowingly interfere with non-802.11 devices. If a device has the capability to detect the presence of other non-802.11 devices, it should act upon such detection. The capability to detect non-802.11 devices operating in the same area should be an option in the standard to address concerns relating to coexistence with non 802.11 devices. Slide 2 Peter Loc & Kiran Page 2 Luke Qian etc, Cisco John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.

From LB136 CID 10025 Proposed Resolution July 2008 September 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1101r3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 From LB136 CID 10025 Proposed Resolution Proposed changes: 1) In subclause 7.32.57.5, use the reserved bit B3 of the Extended Capabilities field for the HT AP or HT STA to declare its support for non-802.11 radio scans. 2) In subclause 11.14.3.2, insert after line 12 , page 223: Before an AP or IDO STA that is capable of detecting non-802.11 radios (bit B3 of the Extended capabilities field is set to 1) starts a 20/40 MHz BSS, it shall perform overlapping BSS scans to search for non-802.11 radios. 3) In subclause 11.14.3.2, insert after line 65 , page 223, the following: An FC HT AP 2G4 that is capable of detecting non-802.11 radios shall keep the value of 20/40 Operation Permitted to FALSE if a presence of non-802.11 radio is detected. 4) Insert the following paragraph at the end of subclause 11.14.5, page 230, after line 13 An FC HT STA 2G4 that is associated with an FC HT AP 2G4 and is capable of performing non-802.11 radio scans (bit B3 of the Extended Capability field is set to 1) shall perform at least one non 802.11 radio scan every dot11BSSWidthTriggerScanInterval seconds., unless the FC HT STA 2G4 satisfies the conditions described in 11.14.6. Slide 3 Peter Loc & Kiran Page 3 Luke Qian etc, Cisco John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.

Reasons for accepting the CID 10025 comment resolution as proposed July 2008 September 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1101r3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Reasons for accepting the CID 10025 comment resolution as proposed To remove the notion that the recommendation in the current IEEE802.11n Draft 7.0 creates a class of 802.11n devices that knowingly interfere with non 802.11 devices Results from new interference measurement tests (shown later in this submission) indicate that Bluetooth services (especially voice calls) are severely affected when a 40 MHz BSS is started or the BSS switches from 20 MHz to 40 MHz in 2.4 GHz Slide 4 Peter Loc & Kiran Page 4 Luke Qian etc, Cisco John R. Barr, Motorola, Inc.

Effects of 40 MHz operation in 2.4 GHz July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Effects of 40 MHz operation in 2.4 GHz Interference measurement tests so far indicated various degrees of interferences – See the following list of documents 11-08-0880-00-0vht-reponse-to-official-comments 11-08-1101-03-000n-additional-40-mhz-scanning-proposal 11-08-0992-00-000n-20-40-mhz-11n-interference-on-bluetooth 11-08-1140-00-000n-11n-40-mhz-and-bt-coexistence-test-results 11-08-0880-00-0vht-reponse-to-official-comment 19-08-0027-02-0000-ieee-802-11n-40-mhz-impact-on-bt-performance It is observed that results of most measurement tests were taken when Bluetooth devices have already adapted to a new hopping sequence to avoid interfering channels Slide 5 Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Severe interferences to existing Bluetooth service were observed when July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Interference Measurement Tests Focusing on BSS starting and switching to 40 MHz Severe interferences to existing Bluetooth service were observed when BSS started a 40 MHz operation BSS switched from 20 MHz to 40 MHz Slide 6 Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Test Setup November 2008 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 11n - AP ~10m Bluetooth Headset 11n - STA ~1m Bluetooth dongle Agilent Spectrum Analyser Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Test setup (ctn) 11n Continuous Tx-Rx mode, Channel 5 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Test setup (ctn) 11n Continuous Tx-Rx mode, Channel 5 Bandwidth switched at noted time-stamp Bluetooth Mustek Wireless Stereo Headset, MBT-A120 single tone sent from the laptop to headset through the dongle Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Nominal Behaviour Top : on@40MHz  20MHz  40MHz July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Nominal Behaviour off 40MHz 20MHz 40MHz off 20MHz 40MHz 20MHz Start (11n off): 0s 11n-on : ~10s 11n-switch-BW : ~60s 11n-switch-BW : ~120s Top : on@40MHz  20MHz  40MHz Bottom : on@20MHz  40MHz  20MHz Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Worst Case Top : on@40MHz  20MHz Bottom : on@20MHz  40MHz July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Worst Case off 40MHz 20MHz off 20MHz 40MHz Start (11n off) : 0s 11n-on : ~10s 11n-switch-BW : ~130s Top : on@40MHz  20MHz Bottom : on@20MHz  40MHz Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

AFH-Settling Times November 2008 Nominal Startup Transition Trial 1 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 AFH-Settling Times Nominal Startup Transition Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Average on@20MHz 25s 29s 24s 26s on@40MHz 33s 31s 40MHz->20MHz 0s 1ms? 20MHz->40MHz 10s 5s 6s 7s Worst Case Startup 62s Trials are all randomly started and are unrelated across the rows/columns ? : a blip was heard 86s Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Explanation (AFH) November 2008 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 11n-40MHz Bluetooth 11n-20MHz 40MHz(adapt) 20MHz(adapt) Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Explanation (on a BW switch) July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Explanation (on a BW switch) 20MHz  40MHz 40MHz20MHz (needs time to adapt) (has no extra interference) (lower available Bandwidth) (extra Bandwidth) Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Conclusions Bluetooth AFH-adaptation Time 11n Switch-on July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Conclusions Bluetooth AFH-adaptation Time 11n Switch-on Both 20MHz and 40MHz cause interferences to Bluetooth device 40MHz takes Bluetooth longer time to adapt Worst case can result in more than 1 minute disruption After AFH adapts, the effect of 11n is not perceived 11n Bandwidth-switch 40MHz  20MHz does not affect Bluetooth 20MHz  40MHz results in ~5-10s disruption Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Proposal Accept the comment resolution as proposed by CID 10025 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 November 2008 Proposal Accept the comment resolution as proposed by CID 10025 Accepting this resolution will surely alleviate concerns on coexistence between 40 MHz capable 802.11n devices and others that share the 2.4 GHz band. Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco

Thank You Q&A November 2008 July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1021r0 Peter Loc & Kiran Luke Qian etc, Cisco