Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays  Nathan R. Treff,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elias M. Dahdouh, M. D. , M. Sc. , Jacques Balayla, M. D
Advertisements

Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos  Cristina Gutiérrez-Mateo, Ph.D., Pere Colls,
Artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore does not cause a widespread increase in chromosome segregation errors in the second meiotic division.
Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease  Nathan R. Treff, Ph.D., Anastasia Fedick,
Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing–based protocol for 24- chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos  Francesco Fiorentino, Ph.D.,
Michael M. Alper, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Abnormally fertilized oocytes can result in healthy live births: improved genetic technologies for preimplantation genetic testing can be used to rescue.
Mahmut Balkan, Ph. D. , Hatun Duran, M. D. , Abdurrahman Önen, M. D
Single-gene testing combined with single nucleotide polymorphism microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy: a novel approach in optimizing.
Neohormones as biomarkers of reproductive health
Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study  Nicole Hope, M.B., B.S., Hon., Luk.
Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array 
Eric J. Forman, M. D. , Kathleen H. Hong, M. D. , Kathleen M. Ferry, B
Preimplantation genetic testing: polar bodies, blastomeres, trophectoderm cells, or blastocoelic fluid?  M. Cristina Magli, M.Sc., Alessandra Pomante,
Ali Sazci, Ph. D. , Nesrin Ercelen, M. D. , Emel Ergul, M. S
Double probing individual human spermatozoa: aniline blue staining for persistent histones and fluorescence in situ hybridization for aneuploidies  Laszlo.
Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction–based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal.
Complex chromosomal rearrangements in infertile males: complexity of rearrangement affects spermatogenesis  Ji Won Kim, M.D., Eun Mi Chang, M.D., Seung-Hun.
Simultaneous assessment of aneuploidy, polymorphisms, and mitochondrial DNA content in human polar bodies and embryos with the use of a novel microarray.
The significance of sperm DNA oxidation in embryo development and reproductive outcome in an oocyte donation program: a new model to study a male infertility.
Oocyte cryopreservation
The effect of blastomere biopsy on preimplantation mouse embryo development and global gene expression  Francesca E. Duncan, Ph.D., Paula Stein, Ph.D.,
Rapid comparative genomic hybridization protocol for prenatal diagnosis and its application to aneuploidy screening of human polar bodies  Christina Landwehr,
Combination of uterine natural killer cell immunoglobulin receptor haplotype and trophoblastic HLA-C ligand influences the risk of pregnancy loss: a retrospective.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region influence the expression of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor  Alain Wunsch, M.Sc.,
Crypt Y chromosome fragment resulting from an X;Y translocation in a patient with premature ovarian failure  De-Hua Cheng, M.Sc., Yue-Qiu Tan, Ph.D.,
Artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore does not cause a widespread increase in chromosome segregation errors in the second meiotic division.
Shallow whole genome sequencing is well suited for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts  Lieselot Deleye, M.Sc., Annelies Dheedene,
Use of single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays to distinguish between balanced and normal chromosomes in embryos from a translocation carrier  Nathan.
Complex chromosomal rearrangements in infertile males: complexity of rearrangement affects spermatogenesis  Ji Won Kim, M.D., Eun Mi Chang, M.D., Seung-Hun.
Mieke Carine Wim Eeckhaut, Ph.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Application of three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization to human preimplantation genetic diagnosis  Li-Ying Yan, Ph.D., Jie Qiao, M.D., Yuan.
Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray–based concurrent screening of 24- chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human.
High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes  Shelby A. Neal, M.D., Jason M. Franasiak, M.D.,
Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media  Mousa I. Shamonki,
Errors at mitotic segregation early in oogenesis and at first meiotic division in oocytes from donor females: Comparative genomic hybridization analyses.
Katy Hanlon, Lorna W. Harries, Sian Ellard, Claudius E. Rudin 
The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive.
Management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: methotrexate and salpingostomy are preferred to preserve fertility  Stephanie Beall, M.D., Ph.D., Alan H. DeCherney,
Premature ovarian failure in a patient with a complex chromosome rearrangement involving the critical region Xq24, characterized by analysis using fluorescence.
Samer Alfarawati, M. S. , Elpida Fragouli, Ph. D. , Pere Colls, Ph. D
Dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 13 after preimplantation genetic screening: case report  Deborah.
“Information-rich” reproductive outcomes in carriers of a structural chromosome rearrangement ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss  Michelle.
Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in morphologically normal nonhuman primate preimplantation embryos  Cathérine Dupont, Ph.D., James Segars, M.D., Alan.
Douglas T. Carrell, Ph.D., Benjamin R. Emery, B.S. 
William B. Schoolcraft, M. D. , Elpida Fragouli, Ph. D
P-425 Fertility and Sterility Volume 86, Issue 3, (September 2006)
Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based DNA fingerprinting  Nathan R. Treff, Ph.D., Jing Su,
Association study between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the VEGF gene and polycystic ovary syndrome  Eung-Ji Lee, M.Sc., Bermseok Oh, Ph.D., Jong-Young.
Genome-wide linkage analysis to age at natural menopause in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study  Joanne M. Murabito, M.D. Sc.M., Qiong.
Single-blastomere whole-genome DNA fingerprinting results in unequivocal embryo identification – a powerful new clinical and diagnostic tool  N.R. Treff,
Identification of X chromosome copies by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for population screening tests  Ester S. Ramos, M.D., Ph.D.,
S. Samuel Kim, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility 
Eung-Ji Lee, M. Sc. , Bermseok Oh, Ph. D. , Jong-Young Lee, Ph. D
Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of chromosomal imbalances on embryos: the evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations 
Laser zona drilling does not induce hsp70i transcription in blastomeres of eight-cell mouse embryos  Cristina Hartshorn, Ph.D., Aleksandra Anshelevich,
Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study  Richard.
Impact of subclinical hypothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss  Lia A. Bernardi, M.D., Ronald N. Cohen, M.D., Mary D. Stephenson, M.D.,
Looking at the endometrial biopsy with evidence-based medicine
Current evaluation of amenorrhea
Assessing the reproductive competence of individual embryos: a proposal for the validation of new “-omics” technologies  Richard T. Scott, M.D., H.C.L.D.,
Shilin Zhang, M. D. , Tao Wang, M. D. , Jun Yang, M. D. , Zhuo Liu, M
Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery.
Elizabeth X. Wu, M.Sc., Paloma Stanar, Sai Ma, Ph.D. 
Combined use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and automatic sequencing for identification of KAL1 defects in patients with Kallmann.
Aneuploidy screening in a coelomic sample from a missed abortion using sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization  Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Ph.D.,
Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh.
Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving
Nathan R. Treff, Ph. D. , Jessyca Campos, M. S. , Xin Tao, M. S
Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles  John L. Frattarelli,
Presentation transcript:

Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays  Nathan R. Treff, Ph.D., Jing Su, M.Sc., Xin Tao, M.Sc., Brynn Levy, Ph.D., Richard T. Scott, M.D.  Fertility and Sterility  Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 2017-2021 (November 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052 Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Graphic representation of copy number changes observed in various aneuploid cell lines using Copy Number Analysis Tool 4.0.1. Left. Results from microarray analysis performed on “genomic DNA” extracted from cultured cell lines. Right. Results from whole genome amplified DNA from single cells derived from the same cell line as shown in the left panel. Each graph indicates the copy number assignments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4) on the y-axis and the chromosome number on the x-axis. Gains (copy number state >2) and losses (copy number state <2) are seen as bars above and below the copy number state of 2, respectively. The likely karyotype is indicated for each sample and is consistent with the designated karyotype assigned by the Coriell Cell Repository using standard cytogenetic analysis. Fertility and Sterility 2010 94, 2017-2021DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052) Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) probability plots for (A) a single cell derived from a female cell line with monosomy 21, and (B) a single cell derived from a male cell line with trisomy 13. Each upper graph indicates the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) copy number assignments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4) on the y-axis. Each lower graph indicates the SNP LOH probability (0–1) on the y-axis. The chromosome number is indicated for both graphs on the x-axis. Arrows indicate chromosomes with unique LOH probability distributions. In the monosomy 21 cell line, there is only one copy of each SNP present on chromosome 21. This is reflected by a shift in the LOH probability of the SNPs toward 1 on the graph (i.e., a complete LOH). In the trisomy 13 cell line, the number of alleles is increased for all SNPs along chromosome 13 due to the extra copy. This is reflected in a greater frequency and distribution of all probes between 0 and 1 in the graph. Because this cell line is male, the LOH due to the single X chromosome is also evident by a shift in the LOH probability of the SNPs toward 1. Fertility and Sterility 2010 94, 2017-2021DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052) Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Examples of copy number results from four blastomeres within each of two embryos, embryo A (A) and embryo B (B). Results indicate meiotic aneuploidy of chromosomes 8, 11, and 14 in embryo A, and chromosome 22 in embryo B, as well as mitotic aneuploidy of chromosomes 1, 4, and 14 in embryo B. Shifts in the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) probability of aneuploidy chromosomes (arrows) in a blastomere from embryo A are also shown in C, illustrating the utility of this quality control analysis for verification of copy number assignments. Fertility and Sterility 2010 94, 2017-2021DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052) Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions