How would you answer this question??

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eating Behaviour Unit PSYA3 Miss Bird.
Advertisements

The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment A study into the effects of prison life.
Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students.
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “Do You Know the Enemy” Green Day “Change is Gonna Come” Adam Lambert.
Stanford Prison Experiment
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
Philip Zimbardo By: Steph Cataline. Who is Philip Zimbardo? The “voice and face of contemporary American psychology”. Presently, an Emeritus professor.
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “He Got Game” Public Enemy.
Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.
CJ 130 Introduction to Corrections Unit 7 Seminar.
Zambardo Induction and Result. Purpose of the Study Study aimed to answer the question: – “Are the state of prisons due to the dispositional or internal.
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS A)TOKEN ECONOMY B)ANGER MANAGEMENT.
Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Craig Haney and others.
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
Welcome to Unit 2 Any Questions So Far?. Getting Ready For Project 1: Unit 3 Read assignment carefully Review Rubric and use as checklist Proof read carefully.
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
Social Psychology The tremendous power of the situation....
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment. Volunteers More than 70 applicants answered ad & were given interviews & personality tests to eliminate candidates.
Social Learning Theory
prof elham aljammas APRIL2017
Social Identity Theory Tajfel (1971)
RECAP What is the name of Zimbardo’s research?
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Module 44 – Social Influence
What did Zimbardo’s research tell us about social roles?
Effects of status and social power within groups
In what ways are prisons brutal places?
Module 43 – Social Thinking
Parenting Styles and Outcomes
Zimbardo Prison Study- AICE AS Level Psychology
Do Geniuses really need to work hard? Or Does it Just Come Naturally?
Key research: Barkley-Levenson and Galvan (2014) Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain.
Parenting Styles and Outcomes
Stanford Prison Experiment
Outcome 2 At the end of this session you will:
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
Zimbardo Social influence.
RECAP Outline Asch’s procedure using APRC (aim, procedure, results, conclusion) Briefly outline 3 AO3 evaluation points for the research Which explanation.
Dealing with offending behaviour
PARENTING STYLES & OUTCOMES
Parenting Styles and Outcomes

Stanford Prison Experiment
Al Khawarizmi International College Course Delivery Technique workshop
Conformity and Obedience
Starter Imagine - you did not do as well as you wanted to in a biology test, but your teacher praises you for working hard and trying your best. You feel.
Title: Introduction to Topic C- Nature Nurture Debate
PARENTING STYLES & OUTCOMES

I will explain the relationships between the dimensions of health.
The role of minority influence in social change.
Title: Anderson and Dill (2000): Video games and aggression.
Wallboards What were the results of Asch’s Original study?
Welcome to Psychology at North Chadderton Sixth Form.
Privacy and Dignity 7 Standard.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
ATTITUDE.
Stanford Prison Experiment
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
1. What makes a criminal?.
Topic 5: Crime Prevention
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
METHODS OF TREATING OFFENDERS
Presentation transcript:

How would you answer this question?? Explain how the research by Wilson and Kelling (1982) could be used to reduce crime. [10 marks] 5 marks for explaining study Aim Design Findings Conclusion How would you answer this question?? 5 marks for explaining how what they found would prevent crime 10 marks 10-12 minutes do answer and peer mark Good relations with community Informal rules = public order Broken Window Metaphor

If someone commits a crime (EG. Murder), what should we do with them? Prison? Rehabilitation? Death penalty? Nothing? Topic 6 THIS IS THE BACKGROUND

Does punishment work? Does reform work? It is hard to see whether punishment or reform work best in terms of reducing reoffending (recidivism). This is due to a number of factors. Using your handout, arrange the images under the following headings: Before prison During prison After prison THIS IS THE BACKGROUND

A prison study… would this be ethical? Haney, Banks and Zimbardo (1973) investigated what it is like in a simulated prison AIM: Investigate the effect of being assigned to different roles (either a prison guard or a prisoner) This was done to see what was more influential, situational or dispositional factors THIS IS THE RESEARCH

Haney et al. (1973) Method 24 male participants, predominately white middle class college students – issue? Volunteered to a newspaper article They were paid $15 per day – issue? 24 were selected from 75 All completed questionnaire about physical and mental health, family background, attitudes towards psychopathology and any previous involvmenet in crime – issue? Those selected were judged to be more mature, physically and mentally stable, and least antisocial

Haney et al. (1973) Design IV: Role (guard or prisoner) 11 guard 10 prisoner DV: Behaviour of participants during experiment Prison environment created in basement of campus building of Stanford University Guards met the day before for briefing meeting. Told to ‘maintain the reasonable degree of order within prison necessary for effective functioning’ Prisoners ‘arrested’ at home and took to real police station, not told the study had begun. Normal arrest procedures eg. finger prints, mug shots, rights read. Blindfolded and taken to prison at Standford - issue?

Haney et al. (1973) Prisoners Upon arrival, prisoners were stripped naked and sprayed with delousing agent (actually a deodorant spray) Ordered to memorise prison rules In an effort to depersonalise the prisoners, they were to be referred to by a number rather than the actual name throughout their confinement Permitted three toilet visits per day and given three plain meals Counted three times a day Had to complete compulsory work assessments Limited privileges eg. exercise periods, visiting hours Appropriate outfits required

Haney et al. (1973) Findings Behaviour of participant was strongly affected by the role they had been assigned. Both groups internalised their roles through: Loss of identity – prisoners introduced self as ID number to priest, rather than own name Arbitrary control – unfair and unpredictable punishment exerted over prisoners. For example, laughing at a joke could warrant punishment but later not laughing may also warrant punishment Dependency (having to ask permission to go to the bathroom, which was often declined) and emasculation (the outfits the prisoners wore which made them move in feminine ways and provoked insults)

Haney et al. (1973) Findings 90% of the conversations were about the situation, as opposed to real lives The absence of a ‘script’ for the guards did not matter. The guards almost always initiated rude, hostile, dehumanising and acts of physical aggression The majority of guards adopted a ‘tough but fair’ attitude. The most hostile guards created an aggressive culture, where basic rights such as eating and sleeping times were reframed as privilages, rendering the prisoners powerless. The prisoners enjoyment of power and control, Zimbardo names pathology of power

Haney et al. (1973) Findings On the other hand, the pathological prisoner syndrome saw the rebellion against the rules from all prisoners Contrasting coping strategies: prisoners would act ‘good’, siding with guards and being obedient, or becoming ‘sick’ showing signs of extreme emotional distress As a result, 14 day study was cut short at just 6 days due to the concerning behaviour of participants (showing signs of emotional trauma). The guards appeared disappointed to be finishing early

Haney et al. (1973) Conclusions The behaviour of participants is bext explained by situational, not dispositional factors Some residual differences exist between how people individually manage social roles Findings should be used to inform guard training programmes

Recap https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAX9b7agT9o

Explain how the research by Haney et al Explain how the research by Haney et al. (1973) could be used to understand the effects of imprisonment [10 marks]