Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABP - LHC Injector Synchtrons Section GSI, Darmstadt, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Recent developments of the HEADTAIL code G. Rumolo, G. Arduini, E. Benedetto,
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
High Intensity Beams Issues in the CERN Proton Synchrotron S. Aumon EPFL-CERN Aumon Sandra -PhD Defense1.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
1 By Vladyslav Syrotenko (student of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, School of Physics and Technology) Supervised by P. Piot, T. Sen, F. Ostiguy.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
1 Simulation of transition crossing in the Fermilab Booster Xi Yang September 5, 2006 Xi Yang the work has been done in collaboration with Alexandr Drozhdin.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: H. Bartosik, O.Berrig, F. Caspers, E. Chapochnikova, G.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
1 Transverse Mode Coupling Instability in the CERN SPS: Comparing HEADTAIL Simulations with Beam Measurements Benoit Salvant (EPFL / CERN Switzerland)
Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Summary of new FLASH CSR studies Bolko Beutner, DESY Beam Dynamics Meeting
Update on injection studies of LHC beams from Linac4 V. Forte (BE/ABP-HSC) Acknowledgements: J. Abelleira, C. Bracco, E. Benedetto, S. Hancock, M. Kowalska.
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Instability rise-time far above the TMCI threshold: Comparison between simple theory, MOSES and HEADTAIL E. Benedetto, E. Metral Acknowledgements: G. Rumolo,
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Elias Métral, SPSU Study Group and Task Force on SPS Upgrade meeting, 25/03/2010 /311 TMCI Intensity Threshold for LHC Bunch(es) in the SPS u Executive.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches Benoit for the MD team: T. Bohl, K. Cornelis, H. Damerau, W. Hofle, E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B.
Tunes modulation in a space charge dominated beam: The particles behavior in the “necktie” Space charge meeting – CERN - 21/11/2013 Vincenzo Forte Thanks.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
1 Instabilities and Phase Space Tomography in RR Alexey Burov RR Talk May
Update on TMCI measurements March 5, 2008 G. Arduini, R. Jones, E. Métral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R Tomas, R. Steinhagen Many thanks to the.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Three examples of application of Sussix 1)Data from simulations  sensitivity 2)Data from measurements  frequency resolution.
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
Transverse Stability Simulations with Linear Coupling in PyHEADTAIL X. Buffat, L. R. Carver, S. Fartoukh, K. Li, E. Métral, T. Persson, B. Salvant, M.
PTC-ORBIT issues for PSB simulations V. Forte – E. Benedetto – M. Martini S.c. meeting (18/07/2013)
Elias Métral, LIS meeting, 29/01/2008 1/26 GAMMA TRANSITION JUMP FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral and D. Möhl u Introduction with the case of.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
HEADTAIL simulation during the accelerating ramp in the PS S. Aumon - EPFL & CERN Acknowledgement to B. Salvant, G. Rumolo.
Elias Métral, CERN-GSI bi-lateral working meeting on Collective Effects – Coordination of Theory and Experiments, GSI, 30-31/03/06 1/15 TRANSVERSE LANDAU.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
New results on impedances, wake fields and electromagnetic fields in an axisymmetric beam pipe N. Mounet and E. Métral Acknowledgements: B. Salvant, B.
Sergey Antipov, Nicolo Biancacci, and david amorim
Benchmarking the SPS transverse impedance model: headtail growth rates
The Strong RF Focusing:
News on the TMCI and SPS transverse impedance
Multiturn extraction for PS2
All our thanks to Kevin Li and Michael Schenck BE/ABP-HSC CERN
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini (CERN – BE-ABP-LIS)
E. Métral, G. Rumolo, R. Tomás (CERN Switzerland), B
Recent developments of the HEADTAIL code and benchmarking
STABILITY OF THE LONGITUDINAL BUNCHED-BEAM COHERENT MODES
CERN / GSI Meeting on Collective Effects in CARE-HHH APD BEAM’07
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
LHC impedance: Comparison between phase 1 and IR3MBC – follow-up
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches
Status of Impedance studies
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Simulation of the bunching effect:
Presentation transcript:

Simulating transition crossing in the PS with HeadTail E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant LIS meeting - April 7th, 2008

Agenda Context of transition crossing in the PS HeadTail Simulations at constant energies HeadTail Simulations with acceleration Longitudinal aspects Crossing transition with a broadband impedance Perspectives

Context of PS transition crossing Elias presentation in January : Instabilities appear at transition crossing in the PS

Context of PS transition crossing Question from PS2 project:  how fast should we cross transition in PS2 to avoid instabilities ?  Analytical calculations made by Elias (see 29/01/08 LIS meeting presentation )  HeadTail was modified to enable acceleration during simulation

Simulation parameters No broadband impedance No space charge impedance nTOF PS parameters (E. Métral) Transition Energy is constant (t ~ 6.08) Higher orders of momentum compaction factor are not taken into account Beam momentum is increased linearly with time: Here

Agenda Context of transition crossing in the PS HeadTail Simulations at constant energies HeadTail Simulations with acceleration Longitudinal aspects Crossing transition with a broadband impedance Perspectives

BB – no SC – no acceleration – simulations at various energies Bunch lengths and momentum spread were adjusted at each energy to get a linearly matched bunch in the PS bucket with a longitudinal emittance of 2 eVs. Bunch Length Emittance Getting closer to transition transition = 6.08 The bunch is longer far from transition  linear matching equations do not hold

BB – no SC – no acceleration – simulations at various energies Analytical calculations of the longitudinal motion of a particle at the edge of a bunch with 2 eVs longitudinal emittance in a static bucket. For comparison, the accelerating bucket is also shown Stationary bucket 2 eVs for a linear restoring force 2 eVs for non linear restoring force Accelerating bucket (the area of the (z,) ellipse is not constant, but these are not canonical variables)

BB – no SC – no acceleration – simulations at various energies Instabilitity threshold is at  ~ 5.2

With BB no acceleration -  = 5.2 -  = -0.010

With BB no acceleration -  = 5.4 -  = -0.007

With BB no acceleration -  = 5.6 -  = -0.005

With BB no acceleration -  = 5.8 -  = -0.003

With BB no acceleration -  = 6.0 -  = -0.0008

Comparison with analytical estimates

Agenda Context of transition crossing in the PS HeadTail Simulations at constant energies HeadTail Simulations with acceleration Longitudinal aspects Crossing transition with a broadband impedance Perspectives

Longitudinal ellipse shape while crossing transition Elias’s plot of the tilt of the ellipse in the longitudinal phase space Case of the nTOF bunch in the PS WITHOUT space charge (2/2)

Checking simulated longitudinal motion during transition crossing HeadTail simulation : observing 10% of the macroparticles in the longitudinal phase space What about the shape of the ellipse?  follow some particles over 10 turns…

Initial distribution Only the blue particles will be displayed to assess the tilt of the ellipse

Tracking macroparticles with l ~ 2 eVs

No BB – no SC – comparing HeadTail with analytical calculations from Elias Reasonable agreement

Agenda Context of transition crossing in the PS HeadTail Simulations at constant energies HeadTail Simulations with acceleration Longitudinal aspects Crossing transition with a broadband impedance Perspectives

BB impedance – no SC Initial  = 5.65 Unstable from t=0

BB impedance – no SC  Linear scale <y> Log scale <y> Initial  = 4.6 Stable at t = 0 Unstable at  = 5.25  Relativistic gamma Linear scale <y> Vertical position of Centroid [m] Log scale <y> Vertical position of Centroid [m] Growth rate ~ 60 µs

Agenda Context of transition crossing in the PS HeadTail Simulations at constant energies HeadTail Simulations with acceleration Longitudinal aspects Crossing transition with a broadband impedance Perspectives

Perspectives Good agreement between analytical calculations and HeadTail simulations In HeadTail simulations Include possibility of t jump Include transverse space charge Take into account the non linear momentum factor 1 Include possibility of longitudinal space charge Simulate PS2 parameters and assess the maximum time allowed for transition crossing