Mario Carere, Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Teresa Lettieri, Robert Kase

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
Advertisements

Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
1 TASK 3.2 C CMEP Mandate Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi, Bernd Gawlik, Valeria Dulio.
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, WG E
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David WG E
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Need for continuous exchanges on chemical monitoring issues, in the light of the on-going.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Draft Mandate Johannes Grath Balázs Horvath (DG Env)
Framework contract ENV.D2/FRA/2012/0025
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006
JRC’s Follow-up work to improve GES assessment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA)
SSG on WFD and agriculture
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
River Basin Management Plans
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA) ( )
WG C Groundwater Draft Mandate
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Information on projects
Drafting group Mixing Zones
WG C Groundwater Progress Report to SCG SCG-Meeting, 07/
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Contaminants Implementation of descriptors Coordination MSFD – WFD , WFD WG chemicals, Bruxelles,
Activity on WFD and Agriculture
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
A Sea for Life MSFD related projects under Integrated Maritime Policy
Part I.
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
European Marine Strategy
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
* 100% = 15 Member States.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Finalisation of study report
EU Water Framework Directive
Technical report on emerging substances
River Basin Management Plans
Water Directors meeting November
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Scientific Support to Policies
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
Assessment scales and aggregation
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Finalisation of study report
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

Mario Carere, Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Teresa Lettieri, Robert Kase EFFECT-BASED TASK TERMS of REFERENCE (2017-2018) Mario Carere, Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Teresa Lettieri, Robert Kase Bruxelles - WG GES-Marine Strategy 10 March 2017

SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND Thousands of chemical substances are discharged daily, from point and diffuse sources. To analyze and derive assessment criteria for all these substances is highly challenging. Awareness that chemicals never occur as individual compounds in the environment but as components of very complex mixtures is rising. Assessment criteria for chemicals are generally developed substance-by-substance, based on laboratory studies, and usually do not consider the consequences of simultaneous exposure to multiple chemicals. Specifically-acting chemicals can be grouped according to their MoA (Mode of Action) and addressed by cost-efficient effect-based methods.

POLICY BACKGROUND CMEP (Chemical Monitoring and Emerging Pollutants) Activity-Task on Effect-Based Tools (2010-2012) Technical Report on Aquatic Effect Based Tools (2014-077) WG Chemicals Mandate 2016-2018 (“Effect-based assays; links between chemical and ecological status; mixtures. Possible follow-up of estrogen-screening project. Exchange of information on innovative techniques, approaches and potential application in WFD context”)

Technical Report-Objectives identified As screening tools in the framework of the pressures and impacts assessment to aid in the prioritisation of water bodies; To establish early-warning systems; To take the effects of chemical mixtures or chemicals that are not analysed into account; To provide additional support in water and sediment quality assessment.   

GENERAL OBJECTIVE EFFECT-BASED ACTIVITY (2017-2018) To examine and further document the possible implementation of effect-based tools/assays  for monitoring and assessment in the WFD context, bearing in mind their possible application under the MSFD. The results of the estrogen monitoring project will support the achievement of some of the specific objectives. To implement the outcome of the Water Directors Meeting (November 2016) to improve mixture risk assessment and risk management under the WFD. 

GENERAL OBJECTIVE EFFECT BASED ACTIVITY (2017-2018) Following the mandate from the WD, and in accordance with the Commission Communication on mixtures and the 7th EAP : "the 7th EAP shall ensure that (…) the combination of chemicals (…) are effectively addressed in all relevant Union legislation " -> focus on exploring the possibility to use effect based tools with trigger values to improve the assessment of chemical risk.

Specific Objectives (1,2,3) 1)Identification of chemical modes of action (MoAs) (e.g. estrogenicity, Ah receptor binding, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, anti-cholinergic activity, photosynthetic inhibition, mutagenicity, immunotoxicity), considered to be of relevance in or via the aquatic environment for the protection of aquatic ecosystems and human health 2) Perform an inventory of MoAs (if known) for currently regulated and/or monitored compounds (in particular priority and other WFD Annex X substances, watch-list substances, and river basin specific pollutants identified to be of concern). 3) Based on 1 and 2, identification and prioritisation of effect-based tools/methods (in vivo and in vitro) available for the detection of the relevant MoA, in the different matrices of the aquatic environment. The prioritisation will consider the level of maturity of the tools, including whether they are available for routine use, and their robustness and reliability.

Specific Objectives (4,5,6) 4) Development, where possible, of in vivo and in vitro effect-based trigger values, signalling a risk to or via the aquatic environment (including risks to human health from chronic exposure via consumption of drinking water or fishery products if possible), with the aim of making effect-based methods/assays applicable (alongside chemical tools) in WFD chemical monitoring and assessment 5) Based on objectives 3 and 4, selection of relevant effect-based tools/methods (in vitro and in vivo) that can be used alongside chemical methods for the evaluation of complex mixtures occurring in the different types of aquatic environments (e.g. freshwaters, coastal waters), and aiming at being able to identify significant pressures and water bodies at elevated risk (i.e. support the WFD assessment of pressures and impacts). 6) Evaluation of ecological methods that can be used to address also chemical pollution, including the metagenomics approaches

Specific Objectives (7,8,9,10) 7) Identification of a list of effect-based tools/bioassays to be considered for MSFD application according to D8 criterion 8.2.1 (of Decision 2010/477/EU) and/or considered within the WFD. 8) Identify ways to harmonise the WFD and MSFD assessments in this context . 9) Assess the availability and suitability of investigative approaches for identifying the underlying causes contributing to the overall risks, to identify sources of emissions and facilitate measures 10) Assess the practical feasibility and cost effectiveness of implementing at EU-scale possible strategies using Effect based methods/tools, to better take into account mixture risk assessment and mixture risk management under the WFD for relevant MoAs, as far as possible ensuring consistency with other legislations.

Marine Strategy Com Decision: 2010:477 (Descriptor 8) Levels of pollution effects on the ecosystem components concerned, having regard to the selected biological processes and taxonomic groups where a cause/effect relationship has been established and needs to be monitored (8.2.1)”

Deliverable foreseen Report regarding the possible application of effect-based tools for monitoring and assessment of aquatic surface water-bodies  in the context of the WFD and MSFD.  

Drafting Group Participants (as at 14 December 2016) Member States and Countries (Sweden, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, France, UK, Belgium) Stakeholders from WG Chemicals (Norman, Concawe, Eurelectric, CEFIC, Eurometaux) JRC and DG ENV Other organisations interested to participate SOLUTIONS, OSPAR, Ecostat WG

Photo: Mytilene island-Greece august 2014 Thank You Photo: Mytilene island-Greece august 2014