Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Infection-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress Triggers Organ-to-Organ Immunological Communication in Drosophila  Shih-Cheng Wu, Chih-Wei Liao, Rong-Long.
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Brian S. Robinson, Juang Huang, Yang Hong, Kenneth H. Moberg 
Drosophila Melted Modulates FOXO and TOR Activity
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Spyros Goulas, Ryan Conder, Juergen A. Knoblich  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
The TEAD/TEF Family Protein Scalloped Mediates Transcriptional Output of the Hippo Growth-Regulatory Pathway  Shian Wu, Yi Liu, Yonggang Zheng, Jixin.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
PP2A Regulatory Subunit PP2A-B′ Counteracts S6K Phosphorylation
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Michael J. Fairchild, Lulu Yang, Katharine Goodwin, Guy Tanentzapf 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Susi, a Negative Regulator of Drosophila PI3-Kinase
Jia You, Yan Zhang, Zhouhua Li, Zhefeng Lou, Longjin Jin, Xinhua Lin 
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Melissa L. Ehlers, Barbara Celona, Brian L. Black  Cell Reports 
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Syntaxin 13, a Genetic Modifier of Mutant CHMP2B in Frontotemporal Dementia, Is Required for Autophagosome Maturation  Yubing Lu, Zhijun Zhang, Danqiong.
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Cell Competition Drives the Formation of Metastatic Tumors in a Drosophila Model of Epithelial Tumor Formation  Teresa Eichenlaub, Stephen M. Cohen, Héctor.
Christine E. Hochmuth, Benoit Biteau, Dirk Bohmann, Heinrich Jasper 
Benoît Biteau, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Reports 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
The POU/Oct Transcription Factor Nubbin Controls the Balance of Intestinal Stem Cell Maintenance and Differentiation by Isoform-Specific Regulation  Xiongzhuo.
The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang 
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Jan H. Reiling, Kathrin T. Doepfner, Ernst Hafen, Hugo Stocker 
Intestinal Stem Cells Exhibit Conditional Circadian Clock Function
Mask Proteins Are Cofactors of Yorkie/YAP in the Hippo Pathway
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Drosophila Schip1 Links Expanded and Tao-1 to Regulate Hippo Signaling
Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 389-396 (March 2012) Drosophila Pez Acts in Hippo Signaling to Restrict Intestinal Stem Cell Proliferation  Ingrid Poernbacher, Roland Baumgartner, Suresh K. Marada, Kevin Edwards, Hugo Stocker  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 389-396 (March 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Pez Is a Binding Partner of Kibra in S2 Cells and Regulates Growth (A and B) Full-length Kibra coimmunoprecipitates with full-length Pez (A) and vice versa (B). Pez-HA (A) (or Kibra-HA in B) and Kibra-FLAG (A) (or Pez-FLAG in B) were cotransfected in S2 cells and HA immunoprecipitates were blotted for Kibra-FLAG (A) or Pez-FLAG (B), respectively. HA-GFP was used as a negative control. (C–E) The small body size of Pez2/Df flies (D) is rescued by the presence of a single Pez genomic rescue construct (E). The scale bar represents 500 μm. (F) Statistical analysis of fly dry weight (n = 16). Pez2/Df females are significantly lighter (0.13 ± 0.024 mg) than control flies (0.35 ± 0.019 mg; p = 4.84E-22). This decrease in weight is suppressed in the presence of a single Pez genomic rescue construct (0.39 ± 0.05 mg; p = 8.46E-15). Analyses were done with a Student's t test (two-tailed, unpaired). Error bars indicate the standard deviations. (G–J) Eyes (G and H) and wings (I and J) overexpressing the indicated UAS transgenes under the control of eyeless (ey)-Gal4 (G and H) or MS1096-Gal4 (I and J). The scale bars represent 100 μm. (K–M) Optical cross-sections through the center of a control adult intestine (K) and a Pez mutant adult intestine (L). Overgrowth of the Pez mutant adult intestine is rescued by the presence of a single Pez genomic rescue construct (M). The scale bar represents 100 μm. (N) The Pez locus (drawn to scale) spans 10 kb and contains seven exons (filled boxes). Pez1 is an EMS allele and Pez2 is a deletion. The region covered by the Pez genomic rescue construct is indicated. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 389-396DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pez Influences ISC Proliferation via Control of the EGFR and JAK/STAT Pathways (A and B) Control adult midgut (A–A″) and Pez mutant adult midgut (B–B″) expressing esg-lacZ (red) and stained for pH3 (green) and DNA (blue). The scale bar represents 50 μm. (C) Quantification of pH3-positive cells per adult midgut of the indicated genotypes (n = 13). Pez mutant midguts contain significantly more mitotic cells (26.77 ± 10.81) than controls (6.92 ± 4.37; p = 1.5E-05). This increase is suppressed by the presence of a Pez genomic rescue construct (10.77 ± 5.75; p = 7.5E-05). Analyses were done with a Student's t test (two-tailed, unpaired). Error bars indicate the standard deviations. (D and E) Control (D–D″) and Pez mutant (E–E″) adult midgut expressing Dl-lacZ (red) and Myo1A-GAL4 > UAS-GFP (green) and stained for Pros (blue). The scale bar represents 50 μm. (F) Induction of the genes encoding the cytokine Upd3 and the EGFR ligand Vn in Pez mutant adult midguts measured by RT-qPCR. Numbers indicate fold of activation over heterozygous control guts. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. Myo1A is used as an internal control. (G–J) Pez mutant adult midguts show an increase in EGFR activity as monitored by staining for dpERK (green) (G, G′, H, H′) and in STAT activity as monitored by expression of a 10xSTAT-dGFP reporter (green) (I, I′, J, J′). esg-lacZ is shown in red and DAPI in blue. The scale bars represent 50 μm. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2012 22, 389-396DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Pez Acts through Yki (A–E) The small body size of Pez mutant flies (B and C) as well as the overabundance of pH3-positive cells (D; statistical analysis as in Figure 2C; n ≥ 10; p = 3.6E-07) and the induction of vn (E) seen in Pez mutant adult midguts are rescued by removal of a single copy of yki. The scale bar represents 500 μm. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. (F and G) Pez mutant adult midguts show an increase in Yki activity as monitored by expression of the Diap1 enhancer element diap1-GFP4.3 (green). Expression of Dl-lacZ is shown in red. The scale bar represents 100 μm. (H) Pez mutant adult midgut stained for Pdm1 (blue) and expressing Dl-lacZ (red) and diap1-GFP4.3 (green). The scale bar represents 100 μm. (I and J) MARCM control clones (I–I″) and MARCM clones of Pez mutant cells (J–J″) (labeled with LacZ in white) in the adult midgut epithelium 10 days after induction. Expression of diap1-GFP4.3 is shown in green. The scale bar represents 100 μm. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2012 22, 389-396DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Pez Acts in ECs and Does Not Require the FERM and PTP Domains to Exert Its Function in These Cells (A and B) The overabundance of pH3-positive cells (A; statistical analyses as in Figure 2C; n ≥ 10; p = 0.0006; p = 0.0002) and induction of vn (B), normally observed in Pez mutant adult midguts, are rescued by Myo1A-Gal4-driven knockdown of yki as well as by Myo1A-Gal4-driven expression of full-length Pez, ΔFERM-Pez (only B), or PezPD (only B). The presence of UAS-Pez full-length alone, without any Gal4 driver, does not rescue (A) or rescues only partially (B). Error bars indicate the standard deviations. (C) Flies of the indicated genotypes were mock treated or fed with 25 μg/ml Bleomycin. pH3-positive cells per midgut were quantified after 2 days of feeding. Statistical analyses as in Figure 2C (n ≥ 16; p = 0.45; p = 0.00044); error bars indicate the standard deviations. (D and E) The overabundance of pH3-positive cells (D; statistical analyses as in Figure 2C; n = 7; p = 0.00013; p = 0.00034) and the induction of vn (E) in Pez mutant adult midguts are partially rescued by Myo1Ats-driven knockdown of yki or Myo1Ats-driven overexpression of hpo, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. (F) The overabundance of pH3-positive cells in Pez mutant adult midguts is partially rescued by Dlts-driven overexpression of hpo or Pez but not by knockdown of yki. Statistical analyses as in Figure 2C (n ≥ 13; p = 2.3E-05; p = 0.30; p = 0.00019); error bars indicate the standard deviations. (G and H) Surface (G, G′) and cross-section (H, H′) of adult midgut epithelium stained for DAPI (blue) and expressing the GFP-tagged Pez genomic rescue construct (stained with GFP antibody; green) and esg-lacZ (red, only G′). The scale bars represent 50 μm. (I) Domain organization of Pez, ΔFERM-Pez, ΔPTP-Pez, PezPro, PezLink, and Kibra as well as location of amino acid replacements in PezPD, PezPPPA PPSGA, and KibraWW mutant. (J) Wild-type Kibra coimmunoprecipitates with full-length Pez, ΔFERM-Pez, ΔPTP-Pez, PezPPPA PPSGA (all J), and PezPro (J′) but not PezLink (J′) in S2 cells. KibraWW mutant does not coimmunoprecipitate with full-length Pez in S2 cells (J). Kibra-FLAG or KibraWW mutant-FLAG and Pez-HA, ΔFERM-Pez-HA, ΔPTP-Pez-HA, PezPPPA PPSGA-HA, PezPro-HA, or PezLink-HA were cotransfected into S2 cells. HA immunoprecipitates were blotted for FLAG-tagged proteins. HA-GFP was used as a negative control. (K and L) Surface (K–K″) and cross-section (L–L″) of adult midgut epithelium stained for DAPI (blue) and expressing the GFP-tagged Pez genomic rescue construct (stained with GFP antibody; green) as well as UAS-Kibra18 under the control of Myo1A-Gal4 (red). The scale bars represent 50 μm. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2012 22, 389-396DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions