James L. McGrath, John H. Hartwig, Scot C. Kuo  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Advertisements

Stiffening of Human Skin Fibroblasts with Age
Fiona E. Müllner, Sheyum Syed, Paul R. Selvin, Fred J. Sigworth 
Defining the Role of Matrix Compliance and Proteolysis in Three-Dimensional Cell Spreading and Remodeling  Daniel Dikovsky, Havazelet Bianco-Peled, Dror.
Precision and Variability in Bacterial Temperature Sensing
Diffusing Wave Spectroscopy Microrheology of Actin Filament Networks
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Single-Molecule TPM Studies on the Conversion of Human Telomeric DNA
Behavior of Giant Vesicles with Anchored DNA Molecules
Volume 96, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Jeremy D. Wilson, Chad E. Bigelow, David J. Calkins, Thomas H. Foster 
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Physical Properties of Polymorphic Yeast Prion Amyloid Fibers
Structure and Reactivity of Adsorbed Fibronectin Films on Mica
Intact Telopeptides Enhance Interactions between Collagens
Novel Fluorescent Ligase Detection Reaction and Flow Cytometric Analysis of SYT-SSX Fusions in Synovial Sarcoma  Robyn Gaffney, Artemis Chakerian, John.
Nanonet Force Microscopy for Measuring Cell Forces
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Masataka Chiba, Makito Miyazaki, Shin’ichi Ishiwata 
Laurent Limozin, Kheya Sengupta  Biophysical Journal 
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Erin L. Baker, Roger T. Bonnecaze, Muhammad H. Zaman 
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 9, Pages (November 2006)
Cofilin-Linked Changes in Actin Filament Flexibility Promote Severing
Following the Formation of Supported Lipid Bilayers on Mica: A Study Combining AFM, QCM-D, and Ellipsometry  Ralf P. Richter, Alain R. Brisson  Biophysical.
Using Atomic Force Microscopy to Study Nucleosome Remodeling on Individual Nucleosomal Arrays in Situ  H. Wang, R. Bash, J.G. Yodh, G. Hager, S.M. Lindsay,
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Samuel P. Veres, J. Michael Lee  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Chang-Chun Lee, Yen Sun, Huey W. Huang  Biophysical Journal 
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Yiider Tseng, Thomas P. Kole, Denis Wirtz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Kristen E. Norman, Hugh Nymeyer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Extracting Dwell Time Sequences from Processive Molecular Motor Data
Felix Ruhnow, David Zwicker, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy  R.E. Mahaffy, S. Park, E. Gerde, J.
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Simultaneous Topography and Recognition Imaging Using Force Microscopy
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Measuring Actin Flow in 3D Cell Protrusions
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Tom Z. Butler, Jens H. Gundlach, Mark A. Troll  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Erika J Mancini, Felix de Haas, Stephen D Fuller  Structure 
D. Kim, B.J. Debusschere, H.N. Najm  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Shobini Jayaraman, Donald L. Gantz, Olga Gursky  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Mikyung Han, Yuan Mei, Htet Khant, Steven J. Ludtke 
Scott M. Blackman, Eric J. Hustedt, Charles E. Cobb, Albert H. Beth 
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Laurent Limozin, Kheya Sengupta  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.
Polymerization and Bundling Kinetics of FtsZ Filaments
Presentation transcript:

The Mechanics of F-Actin Microenvironments Depend on the Chemistry of Probing Surfaces  James L. McGrath, John H. Hartwig, Scot C. Kuo  Biophysical Journal  Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 3258-3266 (December 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1 Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Manufacture and stability of BSA-coated particles. (A) Construction of BSA-PS beads. Polystyrene particles (3μm) were incubated with 20% (w/v) BSA overnight. Shown are 2-μl volumes of supernates from successive particle washes (lanes 3–7) and particle-adsorbed protein (lane 8). BSA adsorbed to particle surfaces appears in multiple bands. Controls without particles (lane 2) or without 20% BSA (lane 9) ensure the additional protein bands are not contaminants from components of the incubation mixture. To avoid signal saturation, samples were diluted as indicated. (B) Kinetics and stability of BSA coating. Four aspects of the coating process are characterized: 1) BSA coats particles in ∼4h, but 2) slowly comes off after washing and dilution into water; 3) a coating solution of 10% BSA or higher is required for maximal coating, and 4) maximal coating never exceeds 50% of the particle surface. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Actin binding capacity of particles. (A) Actin binding by various particles. At a particle density of ∼6×108 particles per lane, polylysine-coated (PLY-PS) carboxylated (COO-PS), amino-conjugated (NH3-PS), and bare polystyrene (Bare-PS) particles bind detectable amounts of actin whereas BSA-coated (BSA-PS) and silica particles do not. (B) Actin-binding capacity of silica and BSA-PS particles. With sixfold more particles (4.2×109 particles per lane) than A, actin adsorption is detected on silica particles but not on BSA-PS particles. Particles were incubated with 0.63mg/ml F-actin for 4h and washed extensively before a final suspension in Laemmli SDS sample buffer to solubilize adsorbed protein. The fragments of BSA seen in lane 1 are also seen in experiments without actin (Fig. 1A, lane 8). Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Microrheology with various particle chemistries. (A) Spectra of micromechanical moduli depend on particle surface chemistry. In order from highest to lowest moduli the chemistries shown are PLY-PS (thin solid line), COO-PS (dash-dotted line), streptavidin-conjugated (STA) particles in 6% biotinylated actin (dotted line), STA particles with 0% biotinylated actin (dashed line), and BSA-PS (thick solid line) particles. (B) Micromechanical spectra of phase angles vary with surface chemistry. BSA-PS-coated particles sense a more solid environment at low frequencies and a more liquid-like environment at high frequencies than polylysine. As with moduli, PLY-PS and BSA-PS particles define extreme behaviors. (C) Low-frequency (0.5–1.5rad/s) moduli for various particles. Most chemistries report a stiffness intermediate to BSA-PS and PLY-PS. The introduction of biotinylated F-actin increases moduli for STA particles from BSA-PS to COO-PS levels. This suggests that filament binding may explain the differences between these chemistries. Error bars span the 95% confidence intervals on the means. Statistics for PLY-PS, COO-PS, and BSA-PS particles were determined from 17–25 particles distributed over four similarly prepared gels. The difference between moduli for these particles are statistically significant (PPLY-PS/COO-PS<0.001; PCOO-PS/BSA-PS<0.001). Statistics on the remaining chemistries are determined using 6–9 particles distributed in single gels. Data for each particle were determined from the average of three sequential tracking experiments. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Correlation of low-frequency moduli with actin-binding capacity. The actin-binding capacity (Fig. 2) correlates positively with moduli (Fig. 3). We conservatively estimate that BSA-PS particles adsorb less than 10 molecules of actin on average. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Probe sensitivity to network cross-linking. (A) Low-frequency (0.5–1.5rad/s) behavior of particles with increasing cross-linking. BSA-PS particles (1, □) are insensitive to the introduction of network cross-links. In non-cross-linked and the most strongly cross-linked gels COO-PS (2, ○) and PLY-PS (3, *) moduli agree well with published mechanical rheometery values (4, +) (Wachsstock et al., 1994. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals on the means. Statistics are computed from 9–15 particles distributed over three to five similarly prepared gels. Values for individual particles were determined from the average of three sequential tracking experiments. (B) Mechanical spectra for different particle chemistries in cross-linked gels. In a highly cross-linked gel (0.3μM avidin), actin-binding chemistries (PLY-PS, 1 and thin solid line; COO-PS, 2 and dashed line) diverge 100-fold from BSA-PS particles (3 and dash-dotted line) at low frequencies but converge at high frequencies. In polyethylene oxide (PEO) of comparable modulus to cross-linked F-actin (3% PEO), COO-PS (4 and dotted line) and BSA-PS (5 and thick solid line) behave identically. This ensures that BSA does not make a mechanically compliant layer between the particle and F-actin (see Discussion). All experiments were done in 2/3mg/ml actin to match the conditions of Wachsstock et al., 1994. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Different microenvironments for nearby particles. (A) Comparison of adjacent binding and nonbinding particles. A fluorescent inert (BSA-PS) particle resides only ∼2μm from a nonfluorescent actin-binding (COO-PS) particle in a heavily cross-linked (0.3μM avidin) gel. Both particles are ∼1μm despite an apparent size difference resulting from simultaneous fluorescence and DIC imaging. (B) Trajectories of BSA-PS and COO-PS particles during 2.2s of tracking at 30kHz. Particles exhibit an order-of-magnitude difference in the amplitude of their motions. (C) Micromechanical spectra of moduli. Particle motions reveal large differences in the mechanical modulus of microenvironments at low frequency, but small differences at high frequency. (D) Phase angle spectra. The microenvironments of both particles are solid-like at low frequency (phase angle δ ≈ 0) and liquid-like at high frequency (δ>45); however, the transition occurs at a lower frequency for BSA-PS particle. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Electron micrographs of particle/network interfaces. COO-PS, PLY-PS, and BSA-PS particles cause little disturbance to an non-cross-linked 1mg/ml actin gel. The average amplitude of BSA-PS particle motions (∼100nm) are shown in the leftmost panel. These displacements are ∼10% of the particle diameter and much larger than the apparent average width of filaments and pores in this image. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 3258-3266DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76558-1) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions