AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOCT / KOTSA(KATRI) New Car Assessment Program in Korea July
Advertisements

Title : KNCAP Current Activities and Future Roadmap Name :
Christopher J. Bonanti United States HOD to WP.29 Associate Administrator for Rulemaking, NHTSA World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.
Future Assessment of VRU Safety Features
66th ECE Commission Geneva, April 2015 Connectivity and Competitiveness for Sustainable Lives Sustainable Connectivity Includes Safe Mobility Which.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
The Vehicle Industry, Regulation and Safety Philip McKenzie Australia.
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
Natural Laws and Vehicle Control Driver Education Legacy High School.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Cars - the better drivers ?
Euro NCAP New Integrated Safety Ratings Simon Edmonds Technical Manager Euro NCAP.
IntelliDriveSM Update
John Harding ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
SP1 – Meeting April 23 rd Schieberdingen Electronic Systems Page 1 of 13 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles.
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
PROSPECT PROactive Safety for Pedestrians and CyclisTs Andrés Aparicio, Applus IDIADA.
DO NOW Chapter 3 Review.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Module 3 Brianna James Percy Antoine. Entering the Roadway/Moving to the Curb/Backing  The seven steps to safely pull from a curb. Place foot firmly.
SAFETY & VEHICLE DESIGN Copyright © 2016 STC, UK.
The U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
Reporting on new technologies and the way forward
Driver’s Education Section IV Day 2.
Reporting on new technologies and the way forward
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Vehicle Crash Testing Adam Hedges.
Envisioning the Future: Effects of Crash Countermeasures
Chapter 3 Driver Responsibility
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking
Overview of CV2X Requirements
MD - Euro NCAP lighting.
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
John Lenkeit, Terry Smith
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Attachment 1: Procedures for Evaluating Automatic Braking (for Vehicles) under Japan’s New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) ○ Test vehicles (mainly ordinary/compact/light.
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Informal document GRSG
Average Deceleration and Peak Deceleration
AEB IWG 06 – Industry Input
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Rear-end accidents with the front vehicle being stationary
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Overview of Test Procedures, etc
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Applying and measuring safety indicators at a local level
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
lesson 9.5 CONTROLLING FORCE OF IMPACT
Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
AEBS-08 – Industry Input.
Effects of an Aftermarket Crash Avoidance System on Warning Rates and Driver Acceptance in Urban and Rural Environments ADTSEA 2019 Burlington VT July.
False reaction test Car to Car
AEB Pedestrian and Cyclist - minimum velocities Sensor opening angles
General Safety Regulation 5: AEBS – Proportion of M1 vehicles likely to pass the vehicle to pedestrian test of proposed draft regulation June 2019.
Introduction: Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles
AEBS-09 – Industry Input.
Presentation transcript:

AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview Euro NCAP is a private consumer test organization, based in Leuven, Belgium, partly funded by European governments Euro NCAP was established in 1997 Euro NCAP tests apply to (passenger car) vehicles with standard equipment across EU-28 Euro NCAP tests are optional, one does not need to have a valid star rating to be able to sell a vehicle in Europe Euro NCAP stars are intended to be consumer information, there is no other implication from the test results

AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary 2018 Rating Scheme 5 star threshold to be achieved in each box Adult Occupant Protection (AOP) Child Occupant Protection (COP) Pedestrian Protection (PP) Safety Assist (SA) Offset Frontal Impact 8 points Full-width Frontal Impact 8 points Side Impact (MDB) 8 points Side Impact (Pole) 8 points Whiplash Front 1,5 points Whiplash Rear 0,5 points AEB City 4 points1 Sum 38 points Dynamic Tests Frontal 16 points Dynamic Tests Side 8 points Installation of CRS 12 points Safety features in vehicle 13 points Sum 49 points Head Impact 24 points Leg Impact 6 points Upper Leg Impact 6 points AEB VRU-Pedestrian 6 points2 AEB VRU-Cyclist 6 points2 Sum 48 points Seat Belt Reminder 3 points Speed Assist System 3 points Lane Support Systems 4 points AEB Interurban 3 points Sum 13 points 80% (30.4 points) 80% (39.2 points) 60% (28.8 points) 70% (9.1 points) 70% (26.6 points) 70% (34.3 points) 50% (24.0 points) 60% (7.8 points) 60% (22.8 points) 60% (29.4 points) 40% (19.2 points) 50% (6.5 points) 50% (19.0 points) 50% (24.5 points) 30% (14.4 points) 40% (5.2 points) 40% (15.2 points) 40% (19.6 points) 20% (9.6 points) 30% (3.9 points) 1: minimum 1,0 points for Whiplash Front required to gain any AEB City points 2: minimum 22,0 points for passive safety measures inside the PP box required to gain any AEB VRU points a car with a five star rating does not need to have any AEB system

AEB Vehicle-to-Vehicle AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB Vehicle-to-Vehicle AEB V2V is part of the rating since 2014 Scoring is based on collision speed AEB City: - Adult Occupant Protection Box (4/38 points) (max. speed tested 50 km/h) - Automatic Intervention - stationary target only AEB Interurban: - Safety Assist Box (3/13 points) (max. speed tested 80 km/h) - Forward Collision Warning followed by Dynamic Brake Support and/or Automatic Intervention - stationary, moving and braking target Rating of FCW/DBS is based also on collision speed (pre-configured brake robot triggered by FCW)

AEB City Test Scenarios AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB City Test Scenarios Overlap GRID example: Total 45 AEB City tests: Stationary target vehicle (GVT) 9 different ego speeds (10 km/h – 50 km/h in steps of 5 km/h) 5 different variants of lateral overlap (50% left - 75% left - 100% - 75% right - 50% right) Score is dependent on impact speed. OEM hands in a prediction “grid” (based on own tests, simulation, etc.), no participation of Euro NCAP in prediction Euro NCAP will perform sample tests to verify the results, a correction factor could apply Total score: 4 points v0 50% L 75% L 100% 75% R 50% R 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 VUT Test Speed Full score (4 points): No collision at 10 – 20 km/h max. 5 km/h impact speed at 25 – 50 km/h

AEB Interurban Test Scenarios AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB Interurban Test Scenarios Stationary target vehicle (CCRs) Ego: 30 – 80 km/h Test of FCW/DBS only (braking robot) (30-80 km/h) Slower target vehicle (CCRm) Ego: 30 – 80 km/h Target: 20 km/h Test of Automatic Intervention (30-80 km/h) and/or FCW/DBS (braking robot) (50-80 km/h) Braking target vehicle (CCRb) Distance: 12/40m Ego: 50 km/h, Target: -2/-6 m/s² Test of Automatic Intervention and/or FCW/DBS (braking robot) Grid approach - as in AEB City - variation of overlap value for CCRs and CCRm test - No grid applied for CCRb test (100% overlap only) For full score (3 points, combination of Automatic Intervention (1.5), FCW/DBS (1.0) and HMI (0.5)): max. 5 km/h (relative) impact speed allowed across the complete speed range

AEB Vehicle-to-Pedestrian AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB Vehicle-to-Pedestrian AEB V2P is part of the rating since 2016 Pedestrian/VRU Protection Box (6/48 Points) Tests during daylight and obscure light conditions Lateral and longitudinal tests Rating is based on collision speed

AEB VRU Pedestrian Scenarios AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB VRU Pedestrian Scenarios 6 Points in total: 3 Points for day tests 3 Points for night test CPFA-50 CPNA-25 CPNA-75 CPNC-50 CPLA-50 CPLA-25 VUT speed 20-60 km/h 50-80 km/h Ped speed 8 km/h 5 km/h Obstruction No Yes Impact point 50% 25% 75% AEB/FCW AEB FCW Test conduct: All tests performed by Euro NCAP OEM has a prediction for performance If deviation between prediction and test results by >5km/h: up to three tests for each speed

AEB VRU Pedestrian Scoring Principle AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB VRU Pedestrian Scoring Principle Lateral Scenarios (CPFA-50, CPNA-25, CPNA-75, CPNC-50): Longitudinal Scenario Braking (CPLA-50): Longitudinal Scenario Warning (CPLA-25): v₀ (km/h) 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Scoring by linear sliding scale (e.g. 40% speed reduction  40% score) Min. speed reduction of 20km/h per test PASS/FAIL v₀ (km/h) 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Scoring by linear sliding scale (e.g. 40% speed reduction  40% score) Min. speed reduction of 20km/h per test PASS/FAIL v₀ (km/h) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 FCW warning at TTC >= 1.7s per test PASS/FAIL Full score (6 points): No collision at 20 – 40 km/h Min. speed reduction of 20 km/h from 45 km/h onwards Warning at min. 1.7 TTC for CPLA-25 scenario

AEB Vehicle-to-Bicyclist AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB Vehicle-to-Bicyclist AEB V2B is part of the rating since 2018 Pedestrian/VRU Protection Box (6/48 Points) Tests during daylight conditions Lateral and longitudinal tests Rating is based on collision speed

AEB VRU Bicyclist Scenarios AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB VRU Bicyclist Scenarios 6 Points in total CBNA-50 CBLA-50 CBLA-25 VUT speed 20-60 km/h 25-60 km/h 50-80 km/h Cyclist speed 15 km/h 20 km/h Obstruction No Impact point 50% 25% AEB/FCW AEB FCW Test conduct: All tests performed by Euro NCAP OEM has a prediction for performance If deviation between prediction and test results by >5km/h: up to three tests for each speed

AEB VRU Bicyclist Scoring Principle AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary AEB VRU Bicyclist Scoring Principle Lateral Scenario (CBNA-50): Longitudinal Scenario Braking (CBLA-50): Longitudinal Scenario Warning (CBLA-25): v₀ (km/h) 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Scoring by linear sliding scale (e.g. 40% speed reduction  40% score) Min. speed reduction of 20km/h per test PASS/FAIL v₀ (km/h) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Scoring by linear sliding scale (e.g. 40% speed reduction  40% score) Min. speed reduction of 20km/h per test PASS/FAIL v₀ (km/h) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 FCW warning at TTC >= 1.7s per test PASS/FAIL Full score (6 points): No collision at 20/25 – 40 km/h Min. speed reduction of 20 km/h from 45 km/h onwards Warning at min. 1.7 TTC for CBLA-25 scenario

AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Outlook 2020/2022 Euro NCAP plans to allow automatic emergency steering (AES) as an alternative to braking for applicable AEB scenarios from 2020 include intersection and crossing scenarios for AEB V2V and V2P starting from 2020 include Reverse AEB V2P starting from 2020 update AEB existing V2B requirements in 2020 include PTW as target for AEB VRU from 2022 include an AEB Head-On function from 2022 From 2020 AEB is an (implicit) requirement for five stars in Euro NCAP Four stars are (theoretically) still possible w/o AEB

AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Summary Euro NCAP tests are optional, one does not need to have a valid star rating to be able to sell a vehicle in Europe Euro NCAP stars are intended to be consumer information, there is no other implication from the test results until today (2018) AEB is no prerequisite for a five star rating some AEB tests are sample tests only in some cases it is possible to repeat a failed AEB test, or repeat a test where the result deviates from the prediction of the OEM full collision avoidance across the complete defined speed range is not required for a full score in any AEB test scenario