Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Crystal structure of Omp32, the anion-selective porin from Comamonas acidovorans, in complex with a periplasmic peptide at 2.1 Å resolution  K Zeth, K.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal Structure of an Octameric RuvA–Holliday Junction Complex
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 1535-1546 (October 2006) The Structures of Frataxin Oligomers Reveal the Mechanism for the Delivery and Detoxification of Iron  Tobias Karlberg, Ulrika Schagerlöf, Oleksandr Gakh, Sungjo Park, Ulf Ryde, Martin Lindahl, Kirstin Leath, Elspeth Garman, Grazia Isaya, Salam Al-Karadaghi  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 1535-1546 (October 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Architecture of the Yeast Frataxin Trimer in Ribbon Representation (A) Suggested outer surface of the trimer with the exposed helices α2 and α3 (shown in yellow). Loops and β strands are shown in brown or red. (B) Suggested inner surface of the trimer. The N-terminal extension, which contributes to the stabilization of the trimer, is shown in green. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Stabilization of the Trimer by the N-Terminal Extension (A) Interactions at the base of the N-terminal extension. (B) Interactions of helix α1 of one subunit of the trimer with the β sheet of another subunit. (C) Stereoview showing a 3Fo − 2Fc density map (blue) contoured at the 1.3σ level superimposed on helix α1. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Stereoview of the Structure of the Central Channel (A) Putative channel entrance. The helical structural motif from each monomer is shown in red. (B) The first conformation of the proposed channel exit. The residues that contribute to the structure and stabilization of the trimer are shown as sticks. In (A) and (B), the electron density contoured at the 1.3σ level is shown superimposed on the model. (C) The second conformation of the proposed channel exit. The teal ribbon model with amino acid side chains (shown as sticks) represents the second conformation of the channel exit. The structure of the first conformation shown as a brown ribbon model is superimposed to demonstrate the two positions of the P125–K128 loop. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Alignment of Frataxin Sequences The amino acid sequences of frataxin from yeast, human, mouse, and Drosophila are aligned with the bacterial CyaY frataxin homologs from S. typhimurium, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa. Residues conserved only in eukaryotic or bacterial sequences are marked in green and blue, respectively; invariant residues are marked in red. The positions of secondary structural elements are shown along the sequence. The overall sequence identity is 40% between the yeast and human sequences, and it is 28% between the 106 overlapping residues (68–174) of the yeast and E. coli sequences. This figure was generated with Alscript (Barton, 1993). The sequences are identified by their Swiss-Prot entry names. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Potential Functional Sites and Metal Binding to the Central Channel of the Trimer (A and B) Electrostatic surface-potential distribution for the suggested outer (A) and inner (B) surfaces of the frataxin trimer. Red and blue denote negative and positive potentials, respectively. The residues constituting one of the three proposed ferroxidation sites are shown as sticks in (B). (C) Top view of the channel with bound iron. The Fo − Fc difference electron density map contoured at the 4σ level (magenta) is shown superimposed on the 3Fo − 2Fc density map (blue). The bound iron (shown as a blue sphere) is located ∼6 Å from the entrance to the channel, as defined by the side chain of L145. The red spheres correspond to solvent molecules. (D) Cross-section through the central channel showing the electrostatic-potential distribution within the channel. The bound iron and surrounding solvent molecules are shown as spheres. (E) The proposed ferroxidation site of frataxin viewed with an electrostatic-potential surface. Distances (Å) between the side chains are indicated in the figure. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Calculated Metal Binding Energy along the 3-Fold Symmetry Axis of the Trimer Electrostatic interaction energies with a +2-charged ion were calculated for each of the two conformations of the P125–K128 loop as described in Experimental Procedures. The red and blue plots show the metal-binding energies for the first and second configurations, respectively, along the 3-fold-symmetry axis of the trimer. The position of the two plots along the 3-fold axis is defined by the MolScript y coordinate (y coord, in angstroms from the unit cell origin). The position of the metal-binding energy in the first configuration of the channel (red plot) is in agreement with the position of the metal ion in the iron-loaded structure (∼6 Å from the side chain of L145). Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Position of Pathogenic FRDA Mutations Residues that are mutated in some Friedreich ataxia patients are mapped on one subunit of the trimer. See Results for details. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Electron Microscopic Model of a 24 Subunit Frataxin Oligomer (A) EM images of the 24 subunit oligomer in 1% uranyl acetate negative stain on the recorded micrograph. (B) A comparison between projection images of the reconstructed model (to the left) and the class averages (to the right). See Experimental Procedures for details. (C) View approximately along the 2-fold axis, which relates two trimers. A total of eight trimers make the oligomer. (D) Packing of trimers docked into the EM reconstruction. The trimers (green and purple) are shown in surface representation. (E) A stereoview showing interactions between the N termini of two subunits from neighboring trimers packed within the 24 subunit particle. (F) Surface representation of frataxin (left) and horse-spleen ferritin (right) 24-meric oligomers viewed along the 3-fold axis, represented with the same scale. The width of the particles is 115 Å and 130 Å, respectively. Trimers are colored according to their electrostatic surface potentials. Structure 2006 14, 1535-1546DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.010) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions