Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes: A System Redesign

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Governor’s Center for Efficient Government. Mission The mission of the Governor's Center for Efficient Government is to promote fair and transparent best.
Advertisements

1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Kathleen McNaught, Project Director ABA Center on Children and the Law National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues Legal Center for Foster Care.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
Strategic Planning and the Importance of Collaboration: A conversation... Barrett Johnson, L.C.S.W. | CalSWEC Lisa Molinar, M.A. | Shared Vision Consultants.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Single Source Continuum Contractor For Foster Care Redesign.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
Day One Introduction Review: Foundations of Independent Living Continuum of Services – Phase I Continuum of Services – Phase II Continuum of Services –
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 Integrating Resources and Services Blending and Braiding Funds Leveraging Resources Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Related to the framework of the State and Federal Accountability Measures Customer Statisfaction with the ACSI.
Objectives General overview of Central Navigation Central Navigation function requirements for the state CYI system Collective Impact processes for establishing.
Community Resilience Jill J Artzberger, MPH 2011 Texas Emergency Management Conference Thursday, April 28, 2011.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
Child Care Assistance Program Waitlist
State Coordinator Intervention
THE ADVANCED LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE
Collaboration and Partnership Building
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
Webinar: The Kinship Diversion Debate
Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Homeless Education Network Assessment & Community Feedback
Continuum of Care Reform Ventura County Update
Research Program Strategic Plan
House Human Services Committee
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Continuum of care for the homeless
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Opportunities for Growth
Impacting Public Policy: Role of the SRC
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Professional Services at FAS June 9, 2014
Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Perfect Together: Aligning and Leveraging SEAs and Parent Centers in Shared Work Helen Post and Kim Fratto January 10, :30 pm – 3:45 pm ET (11:30-12:45.
Development of Fiscal Year Legislative Appropriations Request (LAR)
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
SEND LOCAL AREA INSPECTION
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
DFPS Stakeholder Meeting on: Strategic Plan for FY and Potential Exceptional Items for FY April 27, 2010.
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Human Services Committee
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
Dana Williamson, Director Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Presentation relating to monitoring the implementation of Foster Care Redesign House Committee on Human Services July 16, 2012 Howard G. Baldwin, Jr.,
Building a Full Continuum of Integrated Crisis Services
Howard G. Baldwin, Jr. Commissioner
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign
CPS Kinship Program Updates CPS Stakeholder Webinar April 4, 2019
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
CBC Implementation Updates
Presentation transcript:

Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes: A System Redesign

All Eyes on the Prize In 127 Days DFPS will have recommendations and a plan to implement a new foster care model in the state of Texas. The new system design will be a result of the joint efforts of both public and private stakeholders working in collaboration to improve outcomes for children, youth and their families.

Challenges Facing the Texas Child Welfare System Imbalance in geographic distribution of services and providers Insufficient number of residential providers that offer a full continuum of services

Current Equation (Child’s Needs) + (Lack of Community Resources) = Placement outside of home community Increased number of changes in placement Separation from sibling(s) and family Lack of educational continuity Fractured social support system

Goal of Redesign "The goal of the (foster care) redesign is to improve outcomes for children and families by creating sustainable placement resources in communities that will meet the service needs of children and youth in foster care, using the least restrictive placement settings."

Project Objectives Determine where and what kind of services are needed Determine how to contract for quality services, including recommended outcomes, performance measures and procurement processes Determine how to pay for those services (fiscal system/payment methodologies that align incentives with process and quality objectives)

Quality Indicators Children are placed in their home communities Children are appropriately served in the least restrictive environment that supports minimal moves for the child Connections to family and others important to the child are maintained Children are placed with siblings Services respect the child’s culture To be fully prepared for successful adulthood, children and youth are provided opportunities, experiences and activities similar to those experienced by their non-foster care peers. Children and youth are provided opportunities to participate in decisions that impact their lives.

Project Parameters Case management will remain the role of DFPS, however, model can include expanding role of the private sector’s work with families System design will neither preclude nor require additional funding

Decision-Making Approach Extensive Stakeholder Involvement Process Guided by Stakeholders Decisions are Informed by Data Develop models that ‘test’ hypotheses and their corresponding policy, programmatic, practice and fiscal manifestations Recommendations Due to the Commissioner by December 31, 2010 Commissioner will make the Decision on Recommendations and present to the Texas Legislature in January 2011.

Technical and Planning Expertise DFPS has contracted with two entities who are working collaboratively to develop the redesign proposal: PDF Group, LLC: - Engaging stakeholders - Managing, planning and developing the proposal, including recommendations for a systemic, effective approach to remodeling the current foster care system Chapin Hall, University of Chicago: - Working with American Humane - Facilitating and coordinating fact-finding research - Obtaining stakeholder input and support - Analyzing data and conducting simulation modeling

How Does It Work? Goal – Children spend less time in care. How – Provider establishes network of foster homes in counties where demand exceeds supply Result – Proximity equals support and minimal escalation of behavioral issues Impact – Reduced placement disruptions; children achieve permanency more quickly Fiscal – Lower levels of need; less time in care resulting in a reduction in revenue for provider (improved outcomes create disincentive for provider) Leverage – (Through redesign) Provider is able to reinvest a % of the revenue the state would have otherwise paid for child to remain in care at higher level of need.

Stakeholders Children and families Judiciary Providers Foster care network/association Child and family advocates DFPS field staff Others which include, but are not limited to: - HHSC, Medicaid, and other enterprise agencies - Texas child welfare boards - State and federal child welfare partners

Public Private Partnership (PPP) Representative of key stakeholder groups including: Foster youth alumni Providers Child advocates Judiciary DFPS Advisory Council DFPS executive leadership Role in the redesign effort: Provide guidance to the initiative Serve as conduit of communication between constituents and peers Propose recommendations to DFPS Commissioner

Communications Principles Fully engage stakeholders - Provide opportunities for meaningful input - Keep stakeholders fully informed of project status Ensure understanding of Foster Care Redesign project objectives Provide all information in an inclusive, transparent manner to ensure project integrity Provide opportunities for the Department to understand and stay current on stakeholder interests and opinions

Communications - Project updates and notices - Project survey Methods Website - Project updates and notices - Project survey - Mailbox Alerts In-person meetings E-mail Briefings Stakeholder forum

Communications Progress Stakeholders around the state have been engaged in project activities since January 11, 2010 Project website, mailbox and survey were launched in April 2010 - 622 public and private stakeholders responded - 95 Texas counties represented in survey responses Request for Information (RFI) Notice sent to all licensed and/or contracted residential child care providers 18 responses received Over 1000 public and private stakeholders have been involved in face-to-face meetings - Regional provider meetings - Focus groups - Stakeholder initiated presentations and meetings

Youth Issues Maintain connections with Families and Siblings Psychotropic Medication Normalizing Activities: “Enough Room to Learn” Jobs, drivers licenses Extracurricular Activities Participation in decision-making including input regarding placement decisions, case planning and opportunity to participate in court hearings.

Stakeholder Input De-Link Billing Service Level from Authorized Service Level Provide a Continuum of Care for Children in Care Provide More Services to Families of Children in Foster Care Maintain Progress and Move Forward on Addressing Disproportionality Improve the Assessment Process Increase Family, Child and Youth Involvement in Decisions Impacting Their Lives Better Collaboration/Coordination Between DFPS and Providers

Preliminary Design To Date Performance Based Contract (PBC) RFP for a continuum of care in catchment areas First year should be a hold harmless year for PBC Open to for-profit as well as not-for-profit sector RFP open to non-Texas agencies but preference given to providers with experience in Texas Blended Case Rate- Elimination of Billing Service Level linked to Authorized Service Level Single Continuum Contract

Questions or Additional Comments? Email: FCRedesign@dfps.state.tx.us Information will also be posted to our website at www.dfps.state.tx.us/Child_Protection/Foster_Care/redesign.asp