Toward a Science of Computational Ethology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Targeting of Motor Actions in Climbing Drosophila
Advertisements

Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Abdominal-B Neurons Control Drosophila Virgin Female Receptivity
Volume 26, Issue 23, Pages (December 2016)
J. Dylan Clyne, Gero Miesenböck  Cell 
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Drosophila in the Study of Neurodegenerative Disease
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (May 2007)
Avoiding DEET through Insect Gustatory Receptors
Dopaminergic Modulation of Sucrose Acceptance Behavior in Drosophila
Genetic Identification and Separation of Innate and Experience-Dependent Courtship Behaviors in Drosophila  Yufeng Pan, Bruce S. Baker  Cell  Volume 156,
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (January 2012)
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Starvation-Induced Depotentiation of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Representations of Taste Modality in the Drosophila Brain
Octopamine in Male Aggression of Drosophila
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Opposing Dopaminergic and GABAergic Neurons Control the Duration and Persistence of Copulation in Drosophila  Michael A. Crickmore, Leslie B. Vosshall 
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Lior Cohen, Gideon Rothschild, Adi Mizrahi  Neuron 
Adaptive Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT
Li E. Cheng, Wei Song, Loren L. Looger, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung Jan 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Annabelle C. Singer, Loren M. Frank  Neuron 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Hctsa: A Computational Framework for Automated Time-Series Phenotyping Using Massive Feature Extraction  Ben D. Fulcher, Nick S. Jones  Cell Systems 
HBL-1 Patterns Synaptic Remodeling in C. elegans
Neural Correlates of Reaching Decisions in Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Specification of Multiple Direction Choices and Final Selection of Action  Paul Cisek,
Visual Targeting of Motor Actions in Climbing Drosophila
Action Selection and Action Value in Frontal-Striatal Circuits
Ascending SAG Neurons Control Sexual Receptivity of Drosophila Females
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Obesity-Blocking Neurons in Drosophila
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
Computational Models of Grid Cells
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Motion Processing Streams in Drosophila Are Behaviorally Specialized
Female Contact Activates Male-Specific Interneurons that Trigger Stereotypic Courtship Behavior in Drosophila  Soh Kohatsu, Masayuki Koganezawa, Daisuke.
The Normalization Model of Attention
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Mark J. Buckley, Natasha Sigala  Neuron 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Kristy A. Sundberg, Jude F. Mitchell, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Grid Cells and Neural Coding in High-End Cortices
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (March 2014)
Orientation Selectivity Sharpens Motion Detection in Drosophila
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
Spatial Representation along the Proximodistal Axis of CA1
Vision and Cortical Map Development
Rab3 Dynamically Controls Protein Composition at Active Zones
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
Masayuki Koganezawa, Ken-ichi Kimura, Daisuke Yamamoto  Current Biology 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Toward a Science of Computational Ethology David J. Anderson, Pietro Perona  Neuron  Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 18-31 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mapping, Monitoring, and Manipulating Specific Neuron Populations in Drosophila Using the GAL4/UAS Binary System (A) Upper: parental fly lines that contain a promoter-GAL4 or UAS-effector transgene (Table 1) are crossed to yield progeny that express GAL4, and therefore the UAS-effector, in a subpopulation of neurons defined by the specificity of the promoter (B and C). Lower: the effector can be an indicator to monitor the activity of the neurons, or ion channels or other genes to activate or silence the neurons. Reproduced with modifications by permission from Borst (2009). (B and C) A fluorescent marker allows visualization of neurons identified by different promoter-GAL4 lines. Arrows indicate cell bodies (green dots); arrowheads indicate nerve fibers. Neuron 2014 84, 18-31DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Drosophila Courtship Behavior Sequence of human observer-defined actions in courtship behavior. The actions may vary in their duration and the length of the interval between them. The sequence is not necessarily irreversible. The “courtship index” (CI) is defined as the total amount of time that a fly spends in any of these behaviors. From Sokolowski (2001), with permission. Neuron 2014 84, 18-31DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Summary of Steps in the Automated Analysis of Social Behavior Each of the four steps (detection, tracking, action detection, and behavior analysis) requires validation by comparison to manually scored ground truth. The ethogram illustrates different behaviors performed during male-male and male-female social interactions. From Dankert et al., 2009, with permission. See also Table 3. Neuron 2014 84, 18-31DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ethograms Based on Machine Vision Analysis of Multiple Flies (A–D) Eight different behaviors (A) were automatically scored from video recordings of 20 flies walking in an arena. (B) Two minute trajectory of a single male fly detected among 20 in the arena. (C) Upper: raster plot for behaviors exhibited during the trajectory in (B); lower: translational and angular velocities superimposed on a 30 s segment of the raster plot. (D) Behavioral “vectors” for female, male, and fru1/fru1 mutant male flies. Each column represents a single fly and each row a single behavior. Numbers at top refer to experiment and number of flies tracked. From Branson et al., 2009, with permission. Neuron 2014 84, 18-31DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Unsupervised Behavioral Phenotyping of Large-Scale Neuronal Activation Screen in Drosophila Larvae (A) Larvae from each of 1,050 different GAL4 lines expressing channelrhodopsin-2 in 2–15 neurons/line (37,780 animals tested in total) were photostimulated and video recorded. (B) The contours of each larva from each video frame were extracted (streaming), and each of eight different time-varying features that characterize the shape and motion of each animal in each frame was extracted (sketching). (C) Unsupervised machine learning was used to identify and cluster different behavioral phenotypes (“behaviotypes”), based on the sketches. (D) Behaviotypes associated with each GAL4 line were identified. (E) Actual tree clustering 29 different behaviotypes identified in the screen. Post hoc human labels were applied following retrospective analysis of videos associated with each cluster; clusters below third level could not be discriminated by human observers. (F) Matrix illustrating the different behaviotypes (columns) exhibited by each of approximately 450 “hits” from the screen (GAL4 lines that were statistically significantly different from negative controls). Red circle identifies rare case of one behavior type (#16) produced by activation of just a few lines. From Vogelstein et al., 2014, with permission. Neuron 2014 84, 18-31DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions