Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Using the Internet in Your Classroom.
Advertisements

C.R.A.P Test for Website Evaluation
Ms. Lewis’ Revolution Project Credibility of Resources/ Research Helps.
Evaluating Internet Resources: Fact Checking AccuracyAuthorityObjectivityCurrencyCoverage Things to Consider …
BECAUSE IT’S ON THE WEB IT’S TRUE….RIGHT?? THERE IS A WORKSHEET TO COMPLETE AT THE END OF THIS PPT……EARBUDS ALLOWED….
Researching Your Presentation
Websites vs. Databases Glenforest Secondary School Library Resource Centre Primary Source: M. Rosettis, St. Augustine.
Evaluating Web Sites BTT Mr. Garel. Evaluating Web Sites not all information found on the World Wide Web is accurate and not all web sites, no matter.
Web-Site Evaluation Mrs. Weeks. Why evaluate? Anyone can build a web-site and post it to the Internet Verify information is accurate.
RESEARCH Checking Reliable Sources. Why do I need to check if a website is reliable? Unlike most traditional written information, no one has to approve.
Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages. Evaluation of Web documents How to interpret the basics 1. Accuracy of Web Documents Who wrote the page and can.
Evaluating Internet Sources. What Should You Do?  Identify the author and evaluate the author’s credentials  Identify bias and incomplete information.
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
Internet Sources An Introduction to evaluating information on the Internet.
Evaluating Web Sites C. Schwartz, LMS November 25, 2013.
EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.
Navigating the Internet Appropriate Internet Use in the Classroom.
Evaluating Web Sites. It’s on the web…but is it true? Nowadays, most students rely heavily on the Internet for research papers Nowadays, most students.
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites. Objective The Student will be able to evaluate internet web sites for accuracy and reliability The Student will.
Valid Sources McLean – LA III. Who?  Who is the author?  What are his/her credentials?
Evaluating Web Sources By Kathy West English II Research.
  There are five basic criteria to consider. 1.Authority 2.Reliability 3.Currency 4.Scope 5.Relevance  information is taken from
The CRAAP Way to Evaluate Credibility AP Capstone Research Mr. Linton.
The Big 6 Model for Effective Research While Researching specific topics and how they work you will be using the Big 6 Model for Effective Research to.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website! Ms. Fauss ens/Evaluating%20Websites.pdf.
Website Evaluation "Clip art licensed from the Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com“
The 5 W’s (and 1H) of Cyberspace
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating of Information
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
Evaluating Information Sources
Evaluating Information Sources
Research and Information Fluency
Searching on web Webtruth-how reliable is the information on web?
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
The 5 A’s of Website Evaluation
Are my Sources Reliable?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them
You have an website? We wanna evaluate it!
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
SWBAT understand how to evaluate sources
ABCs of Source Reliability
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating Websites.
Do Now What does it mean to have credible information?
Authority Why should we evaluate an article for Authority?
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites.
Beverly Jorgenson Library/Media Specialist John Marshall High School
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Evaluating Information
C. Schwartz, LMS December 2016
Today we’re going to talk about resources that you definitely know how to find… Websites Have them name some things, make a list on the board of why.
Evaluating web sites Authority Accuracy Objectivity Currency Coverage
Evaluating the credibility of sources
ABC’s of Research.
Created by Karen Christensson Adapted by the SAISD Librarians
Researching Physics Web-based Research.
Is the website you’re using worth your time?
What’s the big deal? Can’t I just find everything on Google?
The 5 W’s (and 1H) of Cyberspace
Choosing a website for research
Evaluating Internet Resources
Beyond Five paragraphs: advanced essay writing skills
CRAAP.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources Evaluation of Sources Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources Tara Guthrie, 2009

Why do I need to evaluate my sources? I want to be sure that the information I find is correct and useful for my needs. Tara Guthrie, 2009

Why would information not be correct or useful to me? The information could be out of date for your topic. (i.e. 10 year-old info on computers.) The person who wrote it may not have enough knowledge or expertise in the subject. The information could be biased or someone’s opinion instead of being fact. The information may not be suitable for your research needs. (i.e. too technical, or maybe not enough details.) Tara Guthrie, 2009

How can I tell if information is correct or useful? There are five criteria to look for in a source: Accuracy Authority Objectivity Currency Coverage Tara Guthrie, 2009

ACCURACY Who is the author? Are they affiliated with an educational institution? Is the book, article, web site, etc. written in their area of expertise? What is the purpose of the document? Why was it produced? (Look in the introduction or foreword of a book, article or website to find this.) Tara Guthrie, 2009

AUTHORITY What are the author’s credentials? Are any credentials even given? Is this person qualified to write this document? Is it published by a university press? (If so, it is probably scholarly.) Check the domain of a web site. Know the difference between an author and a webmaster. Tara Guthrie, 2009

Web Site Domains Reliable web site domains include: .edu (educational site) .gov (government site) .org (non-profit organization site) .net (network site) Unreliable web site domains include: .com (commercial site – may contain biased or non-authoritative information) Tara Guthrie, 2009

OBJECTIVITY What goals/objectives does the document meet? How detailed is the information? Is it too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right for your needs? Who is the author writing for? A specialized or a general audience? Tara Guthrie, 2009

OBJECTIVITY Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda? Is the information well-researched? Is there a bibliography at the end? Is the author objective and un-biased? Is the web site free of advertising? Is there a published review of the book? Is it positive or negative? Tara Guthrie, 2009

CURRENCY When was it published or produced? Is it a first edition? (Many editions of a book indicate it has become standard and is reliable.) When was the web site last updated? How many dead links are on the web page? Is the information out-dated? (It may have been current at one time, but is it now?) Tara Guthrie, 2009

COVERAGE Does the source update other sources or add new information? Or is the same information commonly found elsewhere? Does it extensively or minimally cover the topic? Is the information well-organized? Are the main points clearly presented? Is the author repetitive? Tara Guthrie, 2009

COVERAGE Is it a primary or a secondary source? Are the links on a web site evaluated? Is the information presented cited correctly? Is it cited at all? Is it free, or is there a fee to access the information? Do you need special software to view the information? Tara Guthrie, 2009

Review of the 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources ACCURACY AUTHORITY OBJECTIVITY CURRENCY COVERAGE Tara Guthrie, 2009

You’re on your way! Once you learn to use these five criteria to evaluate the sources you find and ask yourself these questions, you are on your way to using the most correct, useful, and best resources for your research. Tara Guthrie, 2009