Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Shane J. Caldwell, Yue Huang, Albert M. Berghuis  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Marko Mocibob, Nives Ivic, Marija Luic, Ivana Weygand-Durasevic 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
The 1. 6 Å Crystal Structure of E
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Crystal Structure of 12-Lipoxygenase Catalytic-Domain-Inhibitor Complex Identifies a Substrate-Binding Channel for Catalysis  Shu Xu, Timothy C. Mueser,
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Nuclear RNA Exosome at 3.1 Å Reveals Substrate Specificities, RNA Paths, and Allosteric Inhibition of Rrp44/Dis3  John C. Zinder, Elizabeth V. Wasmuth,
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Structural Basis of Proline-Proline Peptide Bond Specificity of the Metalloprotease Zmp1 Implicated in Motility of Clostridium difficile  Magdalena Schacherl,
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1149-1157 (July 2013) Structure and Signaling Mechanism of a Zinc-Sensory Diguanylate Cyclase  Franziska Zähringer, Egidio Lacanna, Urs Jenal, Tilman Schirmer, Alex Boehm  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1149-1157 (July 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of Full-Length DgcZC52A The N-terminal CZB and the GGDEF domains are colored in green and orange, respectively. The subunits of the dimer are distinguished by color hue, termini are indicated. Black lines indicate the noncrystallographic dyads of the CZB and GGDEF dimer, the magenta line represents a local dyad that would generate an adjacent dimer in the crystal (omitted for clarity) with a c-di-GMP molecule on the axis mediating the interaction. Disordered segments are marked as dashed lines. The zinc ions bound to the CZB domains are depicted as red spheres. Substrate analog GTPαS molecules are bound to the active half-sites A and A′ (see also Figure 4A) and to the inhibition sites (Ip and Ip′). Inset: high-resolution structure of the separated DgcZCZB domain, close-up view onto the zinc site in monomer B. The zinc-coordinating residues (H22, C52, H79, and H83) and the conserved residues G54 and W57 are shown in stick representation. The Fo-Fc omit map for the zinc is contoured at 4 σ. Overall, the domain structure is virtually identical to the CZB dimer of full-length DgcZC52A. See also Figures S1, S2, S4, and S6. Structure 2013 21, 1149-1157DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structure of the Isolated GGDEF Domain of DgcZ Two subunits are crosslinked symmetrically via a c-di-GMP molecule (center) that interacts with each active half-site (A, A′). The subunits are crystallographically related and have (c-di-GMP)2 bound to the inhibition sites (Ip and Ip′). See also Figures S5 and S6. Structure 2013 21, 1149-1157DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DgcZ Activity in the Presence of Zinc Chelator EDTA Inhibition of wild-type DgcZ (crosses) and DgcZC52A (diamonds) diguanylate cyclase activity is relieved by zinc sequestration to EDTA. Protein and zinc concentrations were 0.2 μM. Fitting of the data yielded Kd(DgcZ/Zn2+) = 3 × 10−17 M and Kd(DgcZC52A/Zn2+) = 2 × 10−16 M. Structure 2013 21, 1149-1157DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mechanistic Model of DgcZ Inhibition by Zinc (A) Structure of the GGDEF dimer as observed in full-length, zinc-inhibited DgcZ in complex with GTPαS (Figure 1). View along symmetry axis from the top in Figure 1. Subunits are distinguished by color. The two substrates are not in reacting distance (magenta arrows) explaining the lack of activity. (B) Model of a catalytically competent GGDEF/GTP dimer. The nucleotide conformation is the same as in (A), but with the α-phosphates in productive orientation. Relative to the gray domain, the green domain has been shifted into reaction distance to allow intermolecular phosphoester formation (red lines). (C) Comparison of the zinc-inhibited full-length DgcZ structure (gray, orange) with the competent GGDEF model (green) after superposition of the respective A-chains (for clarity the GGDEF(A) domain is simplified by a gray ellipse). View approximately perpendicular to the symmetry axis. To allow catalysis, the GGDEF domain would have to shift from the orange to the green position (red arrows), which, in the full-length zinc-loaded enzyme, would be prevented by the tether with the CBZ domain (magenta double arrow). (D and E) Mechanistic model of DgcZ regulation by zinc. (D) Zinc-binding to the CZB domains restrains the conformational space of the GGDEF domains and prevents productive encounter of the GTP (P-P-P-R-G) substrates. (E) Upon zinc release, the flexibility of the CZB domains is increased and/or the structure changed, such that ribose and α-phosphate moieties can become juxtaposed and intermolecular phosphoester formation (red line) can ensue. Structure 2013 21, 1149-1157DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Zinc Modulates Poly-GlcNAc-Dependent Biofilm Formation via DgcZ Relevant DgcZ amino acid exchanges and deletions of dgcZ or the pgaABCD operon are indicated throughout. “H79L H83L” indicates the presence of the “zinc blind” DgcZ variant. “H79L H83L E208Q” indicates the presence of a DgcZ variant that is “zinc blind” and enzymatically inactive. All strains are csrA- to allow expression of dgcZ and pgaABCD. (A) Picture of a congo red agar plate after incubation 37°C o/n. The intensity of the red channel has been reduced to enhance contrast and the picture was sliced into halves to facilitate figure layout. A bigger version is shown in Figure S7A. (B) PgaD western blot. PgaD carries a C-terminal triple-FLAG tag to allow detection with the monoclonal M2 antibody. This pgaD-allele has been shown to be fully functional (Boehm et al., 2009). (C and D) Biofilm assays. Poly-GlcNAc-dependent biofilm formation was measured as described in Experimental Procedures. Increasing concentrations of ZnSO4 are indicated at the bottom of the panels. Strains in (D) are in addition to ΔrelA ΔspoT (ppGpp0). Error bars are SE. See also Figure S7. Structure 2013 21, 1149-1157DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.04.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions