Proposer: Transporter /

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Code Administrator Working Group - BSC Chris Rowell ( ) 28 August 2008.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Mod Proposal Prevention of "Timing Out" of Authority decisions on Modification Proposals Nick Reeves.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Code Administration Code of Practice Tim Davis KPIs Q
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Supply Point Enquiry Service
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Electricity Governance Comparison
UNC Mod 273 – Governance of Feasibility Studies
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Code Administration Code of Practice
UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 16th January 2014
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
DSC Default Process January 2019
Modification 0468 – Unique Property Reference Number by Gas Transporters David Addison.
Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream
QSEC auction timetable
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Modification 0448 – European Driven Change Process Flow Diagram
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
Urgent Modification Process Flow Diagram
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Modification 0043 – Limitation on offering for sale unsold capacity
DCUSA PARTY PANEL SECRETARIAT OFGEM CHANGE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
UNC MOD 213: USER PAYS GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Mod 0489 EU Balancing Code - Information Provision changes required to align the UNC with the EU Code Debbie Brace 25th April 2014.
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Presentation transcript:

Proposer: Transporter / Proposed as an EU Mod? Note: Modification Proposal Template change required to capture Proposer’s view on EU designation and justification Provide rationale for proposal as EU Mod New Modification Proposal raised. Yes Proposer: Transporter / Shipper / Ofgem No Note: EU modification Proposals cannot be subject to the existing Urgent or Self Governance Procedures. Could be considered as related to an SCR and / or a User Pays Modification. Panel Minutes to capture whether or not Panel consider a Mod to be an EU Mod and Panel’s views on the preferred procedure to be followed. Panel minutes capture Panel’s views : 1. EU Mod? 2. Procedure to be followed Mod considered by Panel UNC Panel Draft Continue through normal Modification Rules Notify Parties of EU / Non-EU designation Mod continues through normal or Ofgem–notified Modification Rules Joint Office Note: EU Mod requirements: 1. Authority may designate Modification as EU 2. Authority may set timetable 3. Authority may designate which Modification Procedure steps are to be followed. 4. EU modifications may not be withdrawn without the Authority’s written permission 5. Authority may revise their position at any time up to Mod being sent to them for decision. Should an Ofgem-raised EU Mod be subsequently designated by Ofgem as non-EU, it shall be deemed withdrawn. Confirm EU Mod to Panel. Specify timetable and procedure to be followed Authority designates as EU Mod? Ofgem Yes Reject EU definition & notify Panel. Normal Modification rules continue to apply No