Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of Chicken γS-Crystallin Reveals Lattice Contacts with Implications for Function in the Lens and the Evolution of the βγ-Crystallins 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Topological Determinants of Protein Domain Swapping
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Crystal Structure of a Polymeric Immunoglobulin Binding Fragment of the Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor  Agnes E. Hamburger, Anthony P. West,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 1183-1194 (August 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 NMR Solution and X-ray Structures of Wild-Type and Mutant CV-N (A) Ribbon representations of the monomeric solution structure of wild-type CV-N (PDB accession code 2EZM) and the crystal structure of the domain-swapped dimer (PDB accession code 3EZM). Residue positions changed by mutagenesis in CVNmutDB are indicated by blue spheres. The different polypeptide chains in the domain-swapped dimer are colored green and pink. N and C termini of the chains are marked by N and C, respectively, and the pseudosymmetric domains are labeled AM and BM in the monomer, and AD, BD, A'D and B'D in the domain-swapped dimer. (B) Amino acid sequences of [P51G]CV-N and CVNmutDB. Residues belonging to domains A and B are colored green and pink, respectively. Disulfide bonds are indicated by brackets and residues involved in protein-carbohydrate interactions are underlined in the [P51G]CV-N sequence. Identical amino acids in the aligned sequence repeats are marked by dots. Residues that were mutated in CVNmutDB are colored blue. (C) Ribbon superposition of the NMR solution structures of CVNmutDB (green) and wild-type CV-N (pink). Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 NMR Solution Structure of CVNmutDB (A) Stereo view of the superposition of the final 20 conformer ensemble (PDB accession code 2rp3). Backbone (N, Cα, C′) atoms are shown in green and all side-chain atoms in pink. The disulfide bridges are colored yellow. (B) Stereo view of the region around the P51G mutation. The structures of CVNmutDB and wild-type CV-N are shown in ball and stick representation and colored green and pink, respectively. Note the different positions of the Q50 and N53 side chains. Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structure of CVNmutDB (A) Stereo view illustrating the relative orientation of the two monomers in the asymmetric unit. Each β strand is numbered. (B) View of the composite omit electron density map contoured at 1.7 σ for the region W49 to F54. This region is the hinge in the domain-swapped structure of wild-type CV-N and exhibits a loop conformation in the present monomeric structure. Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison Between Different Crystal Structures of CV-N (A) Stereo view of backbone superpositions of the two monomeric units of CVNmutDB (green)(PDB accession code 3CZZ), the M4-P51G mutant (black) (PDB accession code 2Z21), and the domain-swapped X-ray structure of wild-type CV-N (pink) (PDB accession code 15LB). All structures are displayed in the same orientation after best fit superpositions of one monomer unit each and the pseudomonomer AB' unit of the domain-swapped dimer. (B) Side-by-side view of the two protein molecules in the asymmetric unit of CVNmutDB (green) and the domain-swapped wild-type CV-N (pink) (PDB accession code 15LB), illustrating the similarity in relative orientation. (C) Protein-protein interfaces for the two monomers of CVNmutDB and the pseudomonomers of wild-type domain-swapped dimer (PDB accession code 1L5B). Similar interactions are present, either between amino acids belonging to different monomers (CVNmutDB) or different chains (wild-type CV-N). Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Titration of CVNmutDB With Mannose Sugars (A) Isothermal titration of CVNmutDB with Man-3. The titration data for 25 automated injections are shown in the top panel, and the total heat released as a function of the molar ratio of Man-3 versus CVNmutDB is displayed in the bottom panel (black). For comparison, previous titration data obtained for CVNmutDB with Man-9 are shown by a dotted line (Barrientos et al., 2006). (B) Isothermal titration of CVNmutDB with Man-2. The titration data for 20 automated injections are shown in the top panel, and the total heat released as a function of the molar ratio of Man-2 versus CVNmutDB is displayed in the bottom panel. The continuous line represents the nonlinear least-squares best fit to the experimental data using a one site model. (C) NMR titration of CVNmutDB with Man-2. The top right hand panel shows the 1H-15N HSQC chemical shift titration curve (bound–free state) versus ligand/ protein molar ratio. The chemical shift difference is defined as: Δδ = [(Δδ HN) 2 + (ΔδN x 0.17) 2]1/2. The bottom panel shows the superposition of 1H-15N HSQC spectra without and in the presence of 3.5 and 12 equivalents of Man-2 in black, green, and magenta, respectively. Selected resonances that experience large shifts upon addition of the disaccharide are labeled with residue name and number in an expanded view in the two top left panels. Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figures 6 Comparison Between Experimental and Predicted RDCs Calculated for Different Models (A) Correlation between 1DobsNH measured for CVNmutDB and 1DcalcNH predicted using the wild-type CV-N solution NMR. The identity of data points exhibiting the largest deviations are indicated by residue type and number. (B) Correlation between 1DobsNH measured for CVNmutDB and 1DcalcNH predicted using the two monomers in the crystal structure of CVNmutDB. Data for monomer 1 and 2 are shown in green and pink, respectively. (C) Correlation between 1DobsNH measured for CVNmutDB and 1DcalcNH predicted using the CVNmutDB solution NMR structure before RDC refinement. Structure 2008 16, 1183-1194DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.05.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions